Teaching girls and women techniques of the last resort self defense, and especially those targeting testicles, can be quite challenging. For some obvious reasons it is not always possible to have real male bodies involved. However, there are plenty of possibilities for very good analogues for different human parts which can be a very valuable didactic and training tool. Today I discus the options for testicle props.
One of the most accessible and quick option is to use two half ripe plums, small peaches, tomatoes or avocadoes placed in a sock or a stocking. It is not difficult to make such a prop, so each student can be given at least one. Being attached to any solid support e.g. a doorknob, girls can be, for instance demonstrated that their strength is enough to rupture a testicle quickly or how to make a proper lock with their fingers. However, this is not a full-time solution. One would have to replace the ‘testicle’ each time after squashing and this option is not very practical for training kicks and knees. Lets be honest it can be also quite messy.
So what are the other option? There are very good fake
silicone testicles on the fun product market, which are, by their feel, texture and
resistance quite similar to the real ones. They come with a long stretchable scrotum
base which makes it easy to fasten them to a support and to regulate the looseness
of the scrotum. Attached to a kicking dummy, or a protective box of a sparring
partner make it an ideal choice for practicing leg strikes (particularly the scoop
kick and kneeing) and grabbing them from different positions.
The most expensive props are real medical models. However, these
are essential if teaching some of the very technical methods like the death
pinch. The high quality ones are made from latex or silicone and have very
realistic testes inside a scrotum with palpable cords and epididymis. I admit I
used to play a lot with the one we had in our self defense class and I have
become very familiar with the fine structure of the delicate organs I do not
have. Using testicle props in self defense
classes can be a fun way to deal with the serious subject of women’s self
defense and at the same time providing the female attendees the best possible training they need.
Thanks for this, these are amazing!
ReplyDeleteI usually use eggs, but they just break so easily, I also tried using golf balls once but they hurt my foot after a while. I think some soft, tender, replica testicles would be perfect. No need to worry about breaking them or hurting my foot I could just kick them over and over and over again :)
Do you know any good places to get these?
I am happy you find the post useful. You are absolutely right, eggs are too soft and golf balls are too hard for training kicks.
DeleteWe got the silicone testicles for our self defense class from this store https://www.billysballbags.com/
I would highly recommend the MK2 model. The size and softness is just right, and the realism and quality of manufacturing is superb. It can take a lot of abuse without breaking. So if you practice different types of kicks or kneeing regularly this is definitely a must to have.
Excellent, thank you so much!
ReplyDeleteNow I just have to come up with an excuse as to why I have fake balls around my house. Telling dates I keep them so I can practice kicking guys in the nuts so hard they get lodged in their throat might be a bit of a turn off lmao :)
On the other hand, it could help you find your soul-mate!
DeleteSo true- especially if it's a lesbian relationship :O)
DeleteYour classes sound like a lot of fun. Do you ever use male assistants to demonstrate with?
ReplyDeleteI do not want to reveal that much but yes. We had two young lads Peter and Bob. They were students from the physical education department at the university. Both were very fit (and handsome, hope my boyfriend is not reading this :) I have to say the classes are nothing like you normally see on YouTube or elsewhere else. No ridiculous padding. They used to wear casual clothes to enact common situation of attacks as close to reality as possible. Sometimes they had to go down to underwear or even as weird as it might sound to full nudity. Well women are not attacked by padded Michelin man-like creatures, sorry that’s how it is. If you want to teach women self defense it has to be realistic. This way we had a unique opportunity to get familiar with their testicles. Not all women had a boyfriend of a husband for their disposal.
ReplyDeleteSometimes they wore boxes, in some sparring situations their testicles would be in imminent great danger. Even then we used to have packs of ice prepared (and were used regularly :-) Sometimes, I pitied them a lot at the end of the classes when I saw them left the building limping, with black eyes, black Adam’s apples. Linda told us they used to volunteer in previous years but had to start paying them decent money to keep them now.
Amazing! I've never heard of a class that realistic. Were the women comfortable with having naked men in the room, and how did they react when they saw the pain that a testicle strike can cause? Did any students quit the course?
DeletePity? Why?
DeleteYou said they volunteered and knew the risks. So what if they got maimed? There are other fools (men) that are out there that could be talked into allowing themselves to be kicked in the balls while naked, so women should do nothing but take joy in seeing men crumple in agony. Their male weakness is their problem and OUR power. Kill all men!
Yes, it was not a common type of class for sure. But this made it so effective, comparing to other courses. Of course, it wasn’t like: From the day 1 there was a couple of naked men chasing girls practicing kicking where it counts. It was not that surreal. We were only 8 attending girls and we already knew what to expect. There were several rounds of the course before so the information and rumors spread quickly among the female university undergraduates. So the girls who wouldn’t be comfortable with such a training have not enrolled at all. And I knew one. She said kicking and grabbing naked guys balls? No way, I’d rather buy a gun. I asked her if she is going to bring the gun to all the student parties we were planning to go and where is she going to fasten it on her tight outfit. It would not even fit in her purse. Well, I could not convince her.
ReplyDeleteLinda our self dense teacher put a lot of thoughts in the content of the course and had arranged the training in such a way it would not get quickly too uncomfortable for us girls. She did a great job in explaining why such a realistic training is necessary and gradually prime us staring with some introductory lectures and warmups and exercises. The guys came in during the fourth class. We got to know each other slowly, especially to get use to direct physical contact. Both guys were very attentive, and I think being hansom and friendly looking helped a lot. Linda took a great care that the things do not go overboard and that our two guys do not end up in a hospital. However, it inevitably created some awkward situations, sometimes too much of ironic comments, giggling, joking not focusing on the points of training but Linda tried her best to keep a professional and constructive atmosphere. There were also some intense situations, especially during close encounters and enactments of sex attacks, girls ending up in tears, swearing to leave the class, but at the end it did not happen.
I noticed the reactions of us girls seeing a man hit in the testicles can be amazingly different. Most were empathetic as me, for some it was extremely funny, and one was just really shocked. As I wrote in the other comment, we were 8 girls and only two boys. So some of the sparring was boy-girl, some had to be girl-girl. I noticed and it was so funny that girls started to fight over to get a sparring boy instead of a girl! When Peter and Bob could not come for three weeks because of the exam term one could definitely notice an apparent sadness among us!
'Linda took a great care that the things do not go overboard and that our two guys do not end up in a hospital.'
DeleteLOL Of course she did. That's why you had a urologist present for all classes and didn't attempt to have a woman play medical professional by 'checking' for serious injuries, correct? LOL.
Of course, you spared no expense by having ice (must have been the 'best' ice, LOL) available as your so-called 'testicular first-aid treatment', administered by a medical student studying what again -NOT urology...
I wonder who would have decided that they should see an actual medical professional in a real medical facility - Susanne - your course 'medic', or Linda. After all, they being away would impact your course schedule as you yourself admitted, so it's hardly rocket science to think the 'advice' Bob and Peter would have received in this regard may not have been completely objective, regardless how uninformed it may have been...
How did you feel the first time you kicked a man in the testicles?
ReplyDeleteI grew up with my sister, so I did not have this typical sister-brother experience. I would say before the course I had a couple of insignificant accidents. Once I swung my hand during a dancing drill and it landed in a ‘wrong spot’ of my partner but based on his mild response it probably did not connected well. Another time I accidentally hit my boyfriend there with my leg during sex, when we were changing a position. But again, it wasn’t anything serious, he brushed it off quickly and after some laughs we continued with the ‘activity’.
DeleteBut you are probably interested in a situation when he really felt it, and this indeed first happened at the Linda’s course. As I remember it was a knee strike and it was Bob wearing sweatpants without a groin protector. We just started the training with the guys to simulate a common frontal attack.
Well, it all started with a strange sensation of squishiness on my knee. Because of this, in that instant moment, I somehow instinctively anticipated a strong response of his body which of course inevitable came. I cannot say for the other women, but in my case the emotions were quite mixed. At first, I was hit by a strong wave of empathy. Every woman naturally avoids doing harm or pain and if she did, she wants to ease it as quickly as possible, it is a primal feminine instinct. The humor from the absurdity of the situation made me to chuckle a bit and then all of this finished a strange feeling of empowerment.
Interestingly, in the following instances of hitting his testicles, the feelings were getting completely altered. The empathy got more and more suppressed, the funny aspect of it, as with any other repeated joke, was over and suddenly the empowerment prevailed. Strangely, gradually I got that odd urge to do it again and again to the point you actually must control yourself… Maybe I am sharing too intimate things here, but in the evening that day I had sex with my boyfriend. He made a particularly deep trust in and his balls pressed against my pussy and the same sensation of softness and squishiness suddenly recalled all those intense situations from the training. I must admit that evening I got one of the most intense orgasms of my life. But maybe we should rather focus on practical aspects of self defense here…
Thank you for such an honest and realistic response. I have seen the reactions you describe many times. Did it ever worry you that you could become addicted to doing this as part of your normal sexual activity?
DeleteYes, I did worry, those feelings were quite odd. I discussed this with Linda, and she said it is absolutely all right and I should consider it as part of the training to change our girly mindset. Luckily, at the end it did not turn me into any serious SM activity. However, I somehow realized how much I neglected balls before. Suddenly I got more ‘ball curious’ and started to play with them during foreplays. For instance, when giving a blowjob, I love to role them in my hands and stretch them but just in a gentle way. Sometimes I also try to unexpectedly grab them during sex from different positions. Then I visualize all the self defense techniques I learned to seriously injure them if necessary. It always gives me some very intense thrills. My boyfriend doesn’t know this, he just genuinely appreciates my new attention to his testicles 😊.
DeleteWendy,
DeleteYou should do that death pinch on one of your boyfriend's testicles (leave him one for now :o), just to remind him of his vulnerability and your power as a woman. You can do the same to the other one in the future sometime (save the event for a birthday gift to yourself!), just because you can!
I would not harm my boyfriend unless he attacks me, and I have doubts it would ever happen. I love his sperm factories, I want them to run at full capacity :)
DeleteQuite a lot of men get an erection when they get hit in the balls. A bit of playful "ball busting" can be very effective in foreplay. Obviously, you shouldn't hit them too hard but you can practice your timing and accuracy - and they get a reward at the end that makes it all worthwhile!
DeleteWell, as a man, I find it difficult to accept that “ quite a lot of men” get an erection after being hit in the balls...if you meant during a ball busting session between two lovers, I can see this of course. As one who has been kicked in the balls b3fore- as many men have, it didn’t exactly result in that type of response..
DeleteI would also like to add that it often seems that women talk about sex as if it’s something a man “does” to a woman, rather than a highly enjoyable act between two consenting adults. I can say that there is nothing - NOTHING more wonderful than orally pleasuring a woman. I would hope that experience is always “rewarding” for her...
If you find a willing partner of course it is always good to combine a foreplay with refreshing self defense skills :)
DeleteI've seen some your comments posted on other blogs. Your violent and sadistic tendencies are certainly apparent....
ReplyDeleteNo, you are wrong, I am not a violent person, quite opposite actually. I only advocate for effective and resolute self defense against sexual predators.
DeleteYour boyfriend really needs to find a new girlfriend...
ReplyDeleteMy boyfriend is very satisfied with me and I am with him.
DeleteDoes he know your online proclivities? You have already stated that you lied to him in order to "educate" yourself as to the intimate details of a man's sexual anatomy. Not only that, you intentionally inflicted pain on someone you allegedly care about to test your theory. That isn't honorable behaviour, no matter what your justifications are for it.
ReplyDeleteNo it was not a honorable behavior at all. I do not need an online anonymous preacher for knowing this. Do not worry our relationship is great.
DeleteTell me Wendy, does your boyfriend know of this blog, or is this part of your life that you hide/lie about? Most men wouldn't think too highly of a partner that fabricates a lie to manipulate him so as to familiarize themselves with his intimate anatomy - especially for the reasons you did...troubling indeed...
DeleteNo, he does not. Do not worry I do not abuse him, I do not torture him. Do you show your partner everything what you are doing online? For instance every porn you watched? Why do you think men should be allowed to have secrets but not women?
DeleteI am glad to hear this - part of it anyway. Have you ever wondered what he would think of you if he did know about this blog and what you did to him?
DeleteIf you had abused him, I certainly would hope the justice system in your country would see you in prison for it. No different than what you would push for if a man abused a woman I suspect -other than the automatic castration that all men automatically deserve, of course... right ladies?
To your other question, I don't look at porn, and I do live alone. Most of what I look at online (other than the US election news) is academic research related that most would find terribly boring.
So I guess you got a lot of material for your academic research from this blog. Tell me what is your specialty? Gender inequality when it comes to the vulnerability of testicles as a target for self defense?
DeleteIf you lived in a relationship you would know some off the answers you keep asking me.
Well, I can say my interest in your blog has no correlation whatsoever with my academic interests. I’m unclear how you conclude since I live alone I’ve never been in a relationship. In addition, the questions I pose to you relate to what you promote both here and elsewhere; they couldn’t be answered by someone else. Certainly some of the things you encourage would not be supported in the judicial system. Some of the statements you attribute to the famed Linda who apparently put on the training you took are obviously her rather unusual views of how she believes society should be, such as convicted rapists being used as genital punching bags. Somehow I doubt that will never -nor should it come to pass. One thing you play fast and loose with is what qualifies as a woman being attacked. Rape isn’t the same as attempted rape- legally or in actuality. Using your current favourite scoop kick because you can kick a man in the testicles- sorry, under the testicles from a greater distance, I’m curious as to when you think it would actually be acceptable to do that. Society has long accepted women physically assaulting men by kicking them in the groin for all manner of slights that don’t involve an actual or threat of physical assault. With all the current churn around equality and women’s rights, etc., there’s finally some discourse underway around female privilege, and some of the structural bias in society that benefits women, not men. One of your posts related to women being able to kick or knee men without the men wearing groin protection during their self-defence training- I commented on it. You went on to say that the strikes wouldn’t “have to be full force”. I can’t think of any woman I know in any profession that would know as much about the sensitivity and vulnerability of a man’s testicles to pain and serious injury as you do. Yet, you actually believe it would be and should be acceptable for women to be able to have this “authentic” training opportunity. I do in fact think you have sadistic tendencies, and while I have stated repeatedly that I support the right of women to defend themselves are learn how to do so, you convey a zeal for it that borders on the extreme, and seem to justify all manner of behaviours by an “ end justifies the means” rationale.
DeleteSeriously, are there any boundaries to the justification behind the technique you might invent or advocate for next? I suppose penectomy hasn’t really been fully explored by you yet. Don’t forget disembowelment. I can’t imagine what your make partner would think of you if he knew of this aspect of your activities. You have a lot of rage within that percolates below the surface of your public persona it seems. I hope he isn’t ever on the receiving end of it.
As an aside, in my part of the world recently, a woman in a local bar had been drinking, and thinking a man that walked by her touched her thigh ( he didn’t, a woman did), she kicked him - hard, in your favourite place on the male anatomy. Unfortunately for her, he was a former hand to hand combat trainer with a military unit here, and didn’t take kindly to what she did to him. He lit her up as they say... she is being charged with assault, and will end up in court. That’s after she gets out of hospital of course...
Further to my comments above, as an example, reread your response to a man that said a woman hit him in the balls using a tennis ball inside a sock. He stated that he wasn’t making any smart-assed comments after that. Your comment related entirely to why such a device was so effective; you had no interest whatsoever as to what lead to her doing that. His comments are suggestive of some verbal altercation or disagreement- obviously neither of us know the facts of the matter. Yet, you had no curiosity at all as to whether that woman was defending herself against him - as if she kept a tennis ball in a sock close by as a normal practice, or she just invoked female privilege and decided it was acceptable to assault him like that - or at all. I can’t imagine you being critical of any post a woman made on your blog- other than her actions should have been more severe and/or she should have done what you recommend and did nothing. Many, many female run self-defence blogs display obvious bias and similarly fabricate justification for almost anything short of decapitation. Dissenting opinions are almost non-existent, since the host simply doesn’t post them. Not that such a thing has ever happened here of course....
DeletePerhaps if you’re interested I’ll share my background story with you some day. I’m not confident that you would find any wrongdoing in it ( not by me- by the other party), so I’m reticent to bother.
Correction. I meant to say above that what you never seem to qualify is what “ being threatened” or “attacked” means to you. Obviously a violent physical assault qualifies, but without the enactment or attempt at actual physical harm, it becomes a little more problematic. Your infamous scoop kick is doubtless a very, very painful experience for a man, and that’s precisely why you promote it. However, when other than the obvious do you believe such a vicious practice is justifiable? If a man is walking down the street at night in an opposite direction than a woman- towards her on the same sidewalk, and she “feels threatened” has the box now been checked on your self-defence menu checklist such that the woman should use your patented scoop kick? You always argue for the woman not to stop her defence until she is certain the attacker is unconscious or otherwise no longer capable of attacking her in any way. You even defend killing the attacker, but of course comfortably avoid discussing what circumstances you think would justify that- although I would think your threshold is pretty low. I read a post of yours on another site that promoted what was a breathlessly vicious action for a woman to take. Even I was taken aback when I read it. I think the woman who kicked the man in the bar I referred to was very fortunate that the defender didn’t do to her what you are never shy of suggesting, of course had he done so, he would be seen as the attacker, and she the hapless victim, and women on every public forum would line up in her defence...
DeleteOf course I am very intrigued why and how an intellectual with apparently too much time on his hands landed on my blog and profoundly expresses his concerns about a presumably sadistic woman and unjustified female self defense. You keep asking me some difficult questions but you do not bother to answer one of mine. You just sophisticatedly tried to get around it. But I ask you again now. Imagine a teenage girl is being dragged by a stranger to bushes and he tries to rape her. It is likely he will also kill her afterwards. What kind of self defense technique would you recommend her? Is a technique causing castration too much, should she just accept her ordeal? And please do not answer by just saying you accept the women's right to defend themselves. If you accept castration can be effective and justified in some instances than simply it has to be also communicated. Which is not a nice thing and I can imagine it is uneasy to listen to for some men.
DeleteHello Wendy,
DeleteI believe I have answered your questions -save the one about my academic pursuits. To be clear, a woman has a right to defend themselves - including taking sever action IF the circumstances warrant it. This is where your position becomes problematic. It's obvious that you think that every sexual assault by a man on a woman justifies her castrating the man, and this is what you provide detailed information on and try to teach women how to perform during an assault. The idea of self-defense-both in law and in general is to 'defend' one self against the attack using force that is necessary in the circumstances. Again, if a man was sexually assaulting a woman and despite the woman's attempts to stop the assault and extricate herself from the situation (which is generally what is allowed in law), THEN yes, she would be justified in using one of your favorite techniques if that in the circumstances became necessary. It is apparent to me that you much prefer that women use the most vicious techniques available that are likely to result in permanently maiming the attacker not primarily for situations such as that I describe, but rather because you feel that due to the nature of the assault - sexually violating a women, which IS indeed horrific, that the woman is justified doing pretty much anything she chooses, regardless of what is required in the circumstances to get free and seek safety away from that individual. It isn't that I don't acknowledge that there may be circumstances where such a technique may be necessary -it is the proportionality of the response I find problematic. While you obviously think every male that assaults a women deserves to be castrated, and I am sure many women also feel that way - even killing the man regardless of whether that was reasonable in the circumstances, fortunately (so far) legal systems in at least western countries do not allow people to do whatever they are capable of and please regardless of what was warranted in the particular circumstances.
So, might castration of a man intent on sexually assaulting - I mean rape, NOT groping a woman's backside, be warranted in some circumstances. Yes it might be. And yes, as man, I find that concept very, very unsettling - that does NOT mean that it may never be warranted.
You shared some personal information about yourself in your blog, and I don't think it's a big stretch to connect that terrible experience with you wanting to create this blog. As I stated several times, I am truly sorry that you had that experience. Sexual assault and rape are wrong. Period. Without exception, and I do not defend it either. Yes, the manner in which you detail the anatomical features of a man's genitals and go into extensive detail as to how to permanently injure/castrate a man is almost nauseating to read. Women likely find joy and humor in it, and it seems that male anatomy is almost a point of humor for women, as is evidenced by your own comments and those of women that have posted on this blog. I cannot imagine that Linda, your self-defense trainer, wouldn't hold those views either.
I am happy to answer (most) of your questions Wendy. I do wish something other than learning about horrific defenses to take against the horrific acts of some men was the basis for our online interactions.
One more thing...
DeleteThis is your blog, and obviously my agreement or disagreement with what you write and your views of the world are not my business. If you would prefer that I do not comment any more, I will certainly respect your wishes (and respect you), and no longer submit posts. If that is your desire, I wish you well Wendy. I do hope that attitudes towards women by many men change, and women can live free of fear. I appreciate a woman with nice legs and sexy stiletto heels as much as the next man, and would certainly prefer to see those shoes remain on her sexy feet, and not embedded in one of both of my testicles out of some perceived fear that another potential rapist is walking her way...
And yet again....
DeleteI believe you or someone else made reference to a 21 year old man that attempted to rape a woman, who literally tore his testicles from his body and took them to a police station in the US. Do I blame that woman for doing what she did? Certainly not. Do I find joy in the fact that a young man attempted to do such a thing to woman, who will live many years in prison, and is profoundly affected physically and emotionally? No on all counts. It was a terrible thing to do, and that young man has, is, and will be paying for it for the rest of his life. An attempted rape and a mutilated young man. Terrible on both counts.
Hello, I think we can actually agree on many things you wrote here. Self defense should not be misused, period. However, you are simply upset with my 'sadism'. Maybe you are right, but I am sorry this is how I approach conveying self defense on this blog. You are a good man, it is highly, highly unlikely a heel of a stiletto shoe will end up in your scrotum. Don't worry we women, or at least most of us can use some proper judgment. I do not think reading this blog is for you. It makes you feel upset. Maybe I am a sadist but I do not like to cause psychological suffering to men like you. And there will be more posts you would consider inappropriate. So maybe to stick to watching the US presidential election and to do some academic reading is the best you can do. Wendy
DeleteSeriously, you need not be concerned that you could or have caused me psychological harm Wendy, fear not. I also think it highly improbable that a woman would attempt to embed the heel of her stiletto shoe in any part of my anatomy. I've never, nor have I ever contemplated physically attacking a woman for any reason, so if that is the sole threshold for such an action, my various body parts should remain intact (I hope). I will respect your wishes Wendy if that is what you want. Frankly, I will honestly miss the opportunity to offer you a different perspective that I believe would ultimately be of benefit to you; I enjoyed our discussions very much.
DeleteAllow me to share my story with you before I take my leave from your blog. Years ago as an undergraduate, I was kicked very hard in the groin (testicles) by a woman while walking down a corridor on my way to another class. I was actually reading a book, walking behind a small group of students that I did not know. I fell, hit my head on the concrete floor, and subsequently suffered bleeding in my brain from hitting the floor; it was life threatening. Some months later after losing the academic term due to absence I returned and made inquiries. As best as I was able to determine, she apparently thought that I had groped her, when in fact it was someone ahead of me. I had not touched the woman, did not know her, and could not identify her either. In any event, no action was ever taken against anyone as a result of what happened to me. The medical consequences of that event have had a profound impacted on my life ever since.
DeleteSo there it is. Now you know.
Dear, I am terribly sorry what happened to you.
DeleteI guess it happened quite some years ago as nowadays and in my country, it would not be left without taking actions. I wrote ‘most’ of us women can use a good judgment but not all. This is not an ideal world. However, you must understand it was an accident. The woman did not want to harm you in any way, she just instinctively responded to an action violating her integrity. Imagine you are suddenly groped by your butt by another man, a stranger. Would you just take it with some humor? No physical response, because it can be dangerous for him?
The fault what happened is of both, him groping her and her not using a proper judgment. I know many woman who have been violated by men (I resisted two attempts) in different forms and it often left some wounds and affected their lives. And nobody really cared, it was just brushed off by usual ‘You take it too seriously, men are simply like this…’ In many cases it could be just easily prevented by a testicle strike.
I am against using the vulnerability of testicles to resolve interpersonal conflicts. As I wrote elsewhere, I love my boyfriend’s testicles and I am not going to kick them because we have an argument over a spill.
But it also does not mean I should stop communicating testicles as an excellent target for female self defense. It would be like banning kitchen knives because somebody was once stabbed to death. We do not live in an ideal world and things which are useful (self defense) can be sometimes harmful. I honestly think you should stop reading this blog. It will not heal you wound, just will make it bigger. You can contact me with an anonymous email using the contact form at https://femaleselfdefense.sport.blog/ if you want.
With few exceptions', using the required amount of force to defend oneself is accepted in law-and that is reasonable. Beyond that- as you have advocated for on other forums (I've read your posts) is not only against the law, but you expressly promote mutilation under the guise of self-defense. This is actively promoted by many women on countless female "empowerment" and pseudo self-defense forums. I have NO problem with women learning to defend - and defending themselves, but there's an obvious trend towards maximizing damage (you yourself make specific reference to this) to the attacker that goes beyond doing what is necessary to extricate yourself from the situation.
ReplyDeleteI do not know which of my posts do you refer to. I always advocated for resolute and efficient self defense against sexual predators, that’s it. What is according to you ‘a required amount of force?’ Do you think a prime concern of a petite girl under violent sex attack should be to carefully estimate the required amount of force not to harm her attacker too much?
DeleteThe Finish police once advised women as a defensive move to extend their arms so the rapist cannot approach her. This is according to you a reasonable advice and a reasonable response to a violent attack?
Yes, self defense, in order to be effective has to be violent and can cause mutilation of an attacker. But this is the problem of the attacker, not the defendant. Maximizing damage is one way how to do female self defense efficient. Maybe it makes you feel uncomfortable but sorry that's how it is. If a woman is being raped, she should be allowed to do everything to get out and even to kill her attacker. I am not here to advocate any violence outside self defense. Tell me which posts are you referring to and I can post a correction if it was not in line what I wrote here.
Since a man may choose to attack a woman for reasons other than sexual assault, and given the effectiveness of the techniques you describe and promote, one may assume that they would be encouraged in any assault situation. If this accept this premise, it is also reasonable that you would accept -in the far less common but still possible event that where a woman attacks a man, he would also be justified in using any techniques available to him that maximize damage, and if necessary, kill the woman.
DeleteAgreed?
No, my blog is called 'last resort self defense' that's I guess quite explanatory. There are also other stages of self defense. No I do not promote castration as a response to a slap to face. I do not know how you got this idea. And yes, men have a right to defend themselves against attacks of women.
Delete"Then I visualize all the self defense techniques I learned to seriously injure them if necessary. It always gives me some very intense thrills".
ReplyDeleteDoes the above quote sound familiar? Your talking about of course visualizing the techniques you would use (your infamous GTP technique I presume) to seriously injure them if necessary. You state that these thoughts came to you while having sex with your boyfriend... These comments and other you made earlier regarding the intensity of an orgasm you had after having sex with him following the joy you felt kneeing men in the testicles during your self-defense class certainly suggests you have sadistic tendencies. Not surprising from your other posts elsewhere either...
My sexual preferences are not of your concerns. Yes, maybe it comes surprising to you that not only men, women also get different types of 'thrills' from different, sometimes weird things. We just do not talk about that much as you men do. To your sadism remarks, I guess you have ever watched porn so I can call you voyeur.
DeleteThis comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
ReplyDeleteIf I found something like one of these in a girl's house, I'd assume they were a sex toy. And then expect ball play in the event of an "adult" encounter.
ReplyDeleteHi, LOL well maybe you would be wrong, and such a testicle model in a girl's drawer is just to train some vicious self-defense techniques :) So be careful with your assumptions, especially when a girl possessing such a toy is about to hold your balls :) An anticipated sensual ball play can turn into something more painful :) Regards, Wendy
DeleteI think I'll take that risk.
Delete