Friday, 6 November 2020

Self defense skills of African girls

During my time at the university I befriended Faizah. She was an Ethiopian girl who came to Europe to study medicine. We used to chat about different things, especially about the life in Africa and once we also touched upon the topic of women’s safety. I told her about the self defense course I have been just taking and asked her whether she would also like to attend. She just smiled and told me: You know I have not taken any self defense courses but do not think women of our country are defenseless. Even in our society a woman has a right to defend herself. Our mothers take care to convey some essential skills to their daughters which are needed when a man is about to disrespect them and tarnish their honor. My mother explained me very early that men are as strong as they are vulnerable in some parts of their body. Once I had to use what she taught me on my classmate behaving indecently. I hope the painful lesson he learned will last for long….

Beautiful Nomadic girls from the
Horn of Africa know how to deal with
both the animal and human predators. 
When I was preparing one of my assignments, I stumbled across an interesting book from Ayaan Hirsi Ali called Infidel. Ayaan fled Somalia in the early 90’s to avoid forced marriage and she got asylum in Netherlands. She became soon one of the most prominent activist and female rights supporters. 

 In the book she recalls the time she spent with her mother and grandmother. They belonged to a Nomadic tribe living a traditional life in the Somalian desert lands. The mothers passed the knowledge and skills to survive in these harsh conditions to next generations. The Nomadic life often meant the girls were left alone in the bush to take care about the herds. And there were predators praying on the goats such as lions and hyenas but also men predators praying on the young girls. When the worst was inevitable, they were told by their mothers what to do. Here is what Ayaan wrote in her book:  
 …my grandmother taught her daughters to run around the man, squat down, reach between his legs under his sarong, and yank his testicles hard. They were not to let go. He might hit or kick, but they were to tug in their heads and take the blows on their back and hope to hang on long enough to cause the attacker to faint. This move is called Qworegoys and the women of my grandmother’s family taught it to their daughters just as they taught them to make thorn-bush fences to protect the huts from hyenas… 

Sarong is a traditional dress of Somali men,
comfortable for a hot climate but also makes the
bad guys highly vulnerable to qworegoys move
   

 After thinking about it, I realized how ingenious this move is. The sarong is a skirt-like men’s clothing and is worn without any underwear. The hot African weather makes the testicles hang loose, which also makes them a great ‘handle’ to grasp and hang on. His possibilities for any counter action against a girl squatting behind him is limited. His sarong partially pulled up in the back makes any movement with his legs almost impossible. He might be able to deliver some blows on her back but that is it. If the girl pulls down using her weight and twists for at least a couple of seconds, he is for sure going to black out. He would be then found unconscious on the ground by his pals wondering what happened. Without present-day medical intervention, a ruptured testicle or both could be a fatal injury. Even if not, he is for sure not going to ride a camel soon. I really like to read about these ethnological and historical accounts of women’s self defense. If you have any tips about some please write them in the comments.  I would be very grateful. 

48 comments:

  1. A really original and interesting topic. I congratulate you again, Wendy.

    I had never considered the effectiveness of an attack from the rear. And more if it is to catch the testicles. I agree that the response of his or possible counterattack would be to try desperately to remove himself, without too much angle to attack -when she was behind-, but at the same time limited in his responses because the pain would make him bend over, close his legs, and try to not move too much due to pressure. As an innate response to what happens to him - without actually being the cause. This implies that in the end her responses are minimal and ineffective, while pain and time play against her.

    I would also like to highlight the fact of the heat and the hanging of the testicles. Which would lie with greater length of fall and volume due to temperature. Which makes them an easier and more affordable target.

    It really is a devastating and forceful attack. By surprise; nullifying almost all of his initiative.

    Bravo for the African girls!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Dear Vil, thanks a lot. Yes your precise analysis is absolutely correct. His natural responses, his clothing even the climate :) plays against him. It is indeed a well thought out technique, all the respect African women.

      Delete
  2. I wish squeezing an attacker's balls until he faints from the shear pain was so common in the western world we needed to invent a whole new word just to describe it! :p

    Bravo to those African girls! They are HERoes!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Dear Lisa, thanks a lot for your comment. You are absolutely right. The fact they have a specific word for this technique means they take it naturally, it is simply one of their essential life skills. Most likely also often successfully used.

      African women are not that squeamish as we western women are, being too shy to even say the word testicles.

      That's absolutely an excellent idea about inventing a new word. We definitely need it! :) Anybody having a good suggestion write it in the comments

      Delete
    2. I don't know what the word should be, but all I know is we should use it so commonly that the very mention of it turns guys testicles into little pain factories.

      Let's use "qworegoys" as an example. Imagine... A man is stalking a woman late at night, she is defenceless. All of a sudden he runs towards her, but, before he can reach her she turns turns to him and simply says "qworegoys". Suddenly, every vivid memory of past testicular trauma floods his mind. That time his sister kicked him in the balls when they were playfighting BAM! That time he got in a fight and his opponent punched him square in the nuts BAM! That time he was playing soccer and the ball smashed him right between the legs BAM! Suddenly our would be rapist is now a quivering mess on the floor, the thing all guys tend to become once they've been reminded of their sensitive parts.

      I know it's probably just a dream of mine but just imagine how many women and girls we could keep safe if such a thing were possible!

      Delete
    3. Dear Lisa, yes that would be ideal :) Using just a magical word to disable would be rapists. Your comment also reminds me the previous discussion about some kind of transmitted testicular pain when a man sees other man getting hit in the testicles. https://lastresortselfdefense.blogspot.com/2020/08/an-inspirational-story.html?showComment=1599196270408#c6209646249738281235

      This demonstrates that a confrontation between a man and a woman does not always have to be decided by physical moves, a woman can also take advantage of his mental vulnerability and anxiety related to testicles as well.

      Delete
    4. I wish we could do more research into how women may be able to disable attacker's via their testicles without ever having to lay a finger on them. I have a sad feeling that the research would never be funded though.... the idea would make way too many men uncomfortable!

      Delete
    5. Dear Lisa that's sad truth. Men do not have balls to support such a research (sorry for the pun). Outcomes of such a research would so beneficial for women all around world, but lets admit, we still live a patriarchal society.

      Delete
    6. I cannot imagine that the findings of such research if it was conducted would EVER be abused by women, naturally...Who would ever contemplate that?

      Delete
    7. Well, I think guns, knives etc. are definitely misused more by men than by women. Everything can be misused, as well as this type of research. The benefits for women, however, would outweigh the possible negatives.

      Delete
    8. Well, that's all that matters, after all. Anything that benefits women is of course, justifiable, by default. And of course, abuse by women would be tolerated as an "honest mistake", like you claimed in that series of posts by that person you got badly injured when kicked by a women who didn't bother to make sure she was kicking the right person. You just blew his comments off, inferring that she had no responsibility for what she did, even though she could have killed an innocent man. Wow...

      Delete
    9. You are just twisting my words here. I admitted she was accountable, there is no disagreement in that, however the roots of that horrible accident was that some man was misbehaving and grabbed her butt. She did not kicked him out of fun or some mischievous urge to injure testicles of an innocent man. It was an unfortunate accident and the horny male perpetrator is faulty as well.

      Delete
    10. Nonsense. I read your posts carefully. You dismissed the actions of that woman as being a mistake, and were no more than mildly sympathetic to the individual who almost lost his life. Nobody - even you, has the right to flail away at someone on the basis that you "thought" they were the attacker. No different than the use of firearms, the person assaulting another person is responsible for their actions. There is no pass awarded to the person just because the did not intend to harm a specific individual, and just didn't bother to check to make the person that THEY assaulted was the perpetrator. I can only imagine what you would have said if it was a man who nearly killed a certain woman thinking he was groped by her, when in fact it was another individual. Life imprisonment? Castration and life? And you call that terrible event an "unfortunate accident"?? Good God.

      Delete
    11. Had that woman been caught - from that post apparently she wasn't, what would you think should have happened to her? Given your viewpoint, I doubt you think anything more than a written apology would have been warranted, if that.

      Delete
    12. And what else than a mistake/accident was it? A perfectly planned hideous crime to harm an innocent man? If somebody starts shooting in public and a policeman has to shoot back to stop him but accidently hits also an innocent bystander, whose fault was it? You want me to blame that woman but you are conveniently forgetting a crime done by a MAN that preceded all that. He was groping her butt. If he didn't do it, there is no ball kicking no harm to an innocent man, period.

      To the other comment. I am not an lawyer, I guess in these instances a compensation is paid, amount depending on the country etc. Or what do you want to hear from me, that she has to be imprisoned for life, shamed by the media, eye for an eye? Go to your pal and tell him to stop groping other women's butts so we do not have to discuss these matters here.

      Delete
    13. The police serve the public, and have strict use of force guidelines they are required (in theory) to adhere to; your analogy doesn't hold water here. I don't have any idea who the man is that got hurt, or the groper was, or anything at all other than what was posted on this blog. According to the posts, she was groped while walking in a group of people at a university. Obviously he should not have done that. However wrong that was, and it WAS wrong, it was highly unlikely that she was at risk of any further harm/contact by that guy. So, her actions could not, and would not be construed as self-defense; she was taking retribution against being groped. Unfortunately - for a completely innocent man at least, she didn't take the trouble to ensure she was doing so against the right perpetrator, she just kicked him assuming he was that person. It isn't known from what was posted if she knew or suspected that she kicked the wrong person, but it appears that no one bothered to check on the guy, and from what he said, it doesn't like like she bothered to report either the assault or her kicking a man as she did. So, the 'unfortunate accident' as you called it goes ignored and forgotten - expect by him I'll wager.

      And you're correct, you're not a lawyer...

      Delete
    14. Are there any guidelines how a woman should properly respond to groping her butt, and what about grabbing her pussy? You seems to be a lawyer so you should know the answer. So what is the moral and proper response? If a stranger woman grabbed your crotch, you would probably say in some lawyer lingo something like: I do not want to have any physical confrontation with you and according this and this paragraph you are evading my intimate sphere and bla..bla..bla.. Of course you cannot slap her in the face, which normally would be a proper response, because she might evade that blow and you might slap instead an innocent woman standing by and she might fell down and hurt her head. Of course you would then immediately take the full responsibility for the incident and asked the court for the harshest penalty possible. Now I understand, you are indeed a lawyer.

      What do you want from me with these posts? This is a blog about justified female self defense.

      Delete
    15. If you think this is a blog about "justified female self-defense", then you should start reading materials that are likely a good deal different than what you currently read. You seem either unwilling or incapable of making a distinction between the types of sexual assaults that occur and what would be a suitable and appropriate response. You obviously love kicking men in the testicles; you study the best techniques available that do the most harm - preferably permanent damage, and you think it's ok for woman to do that in almost every circumstance where a male touches the woman on her person. To give some context here - in case you don't know, the general consensus over here (North America) according to women, is that it is NEVER acceptable for a man to strike a woman. A prominent female journalist said that if a woman struck or slapped a man, the man is to either just tell her it is not ok to do that, and/or suggest to her that she seek help. Really. Pardon my phrasing here, but this has been called a "pussy pass" over here - meaning that a woman is in essence immune from any consequences from physically assaulting a man. I don't know where you come from, but women here have thought it ok to kick a man in the groin for almost anything, and they laugh whenever a man is kicked in the groin. This is irrefutable - just spend 10 minutes on the web to confirm what should be evident.

      So, to your questions, what should a woman do if groped on the butt? Well, I am sure based upon what women see as socially acceptable (for them) she should kick him hard in the balls; why she would do that is established. However, if in the context of the event the grope appears to be a stand alone event, then she is not in a good position to claim self-defense and do whatever to him. Slapping the guy would probably get the point across to him, and I get the highly unacceptable nature of what he did, don't get me wrong. If a man grabs a woman in her groin area, then this is generally considered by most people to be a sexual assault, given the area on the woman's body. I don't think a woman who kicked a man in the groin after that would have much of a problem. What you need to appreciate here (or not, at your pleasure) is that context matters a great deal. The particular circumstances of an assault have everything to do with what is seen to be an acceptable response. The man that was seriously injured at that university was a completely innocent bystander, like it or not. He was assaulted by someone, who may have done so unintentionally, BUT her actions were not warranted based upon the circumstances. That does NOT mean it's acceptable to grope a woman -it isn't.

      What is justified (and justifiable) in one circumstance will not be in another. While I respect the huge emotional component that is associated with being assaulted and that retribution is often a high priority for the victim given the personal violation involved, it isn't generally defensible. Whether you agree or not, there is a huge bias in the criminal justice system in many countries (here as well) against men in favor of women. Women receive significantly lesser sentences (and are sentenced to incarceration) much less often than men for the same offense. I just think you should be aware of such things. I am in no way defending or justifying assaulting women. Period. Obviously I do not like your friend Linda, what she does, how she does it, or much else about her. No matter it seems.

      As a man and obviously cannot fully appreciate the horror a woman experiences during a sexual assault. As a woman, you cannot appreciate what it feels like to be kicked really hard in the testicles. Rape is wrong, and tragically there may be times when such desperate measures as you present on this blog are necessary in self-defense, but I would be cautious of presenting them without proper context if I were you.

      Delete
    16. You two are building some pathetic strawmen here.
      I really appreciate your men's right activism but this is a blog about justified female self defense and I made it clear on several places. Yes if a man is misbehaving and sexually assaults a woman she has the right to respond by a kick to his testicles.

      Again my standing on the incident so we can finish off this discussion. The woman from the incident was groped and this can be considered a sexual assault (although of the least severity) and she had the right to kick him in the testicles. This would teach him the lesson better than any moral preaching. However, she also had the responsibility to do it to the right person not the innocent bystander and she should have faced the consequences. The University failed to investigate which is bad.
      We do not agree on this but that's fine. But I have a feeling you just want me to confess that we women are vicious bitches running around kicking testicles of innocent men to have some fun and get out of it easily because of some pussy pass. And that's not true.

      Please bring your activism to places where it is more appropriate and would have a real impact, for instance try to initiate a movement including movie stars fighting against portrayal of a groin kick in the movies as a funny element or something like this.

      I guess you are from the US where carrying a gun is basically a human right. Why are you not complaining about suffering of people when this right is all the time misused. You think a gun-inflicted wound is less painful than a kick in the testicles?

      Delete
    17. While it may be the case that women feel justified in kicking a man in the groin for groping here backside, such action in the case in question would not be deemed justifiable by any objective standard as self-defense. You have a problem with context, and differentiating between legitimate self-defense and retribution. This isn't a difficult conclusion to draw based upon the numerous other posts of yours on this blog. Your "teach him a lesson" rationale won't fly in many legal frameworks, however appealing it is to you. And no, I am not looking for you to 'confess' that woman in general are vicious bitches (although some certainly can be) that are running around kicking men innocent men in the testicles. What IS true is that there are rarely if ever any consequences through the legal system when they do-this is simply a matter of case law. So, the notion of a 'pussy pass' is still alive and well, and it's somewhat of a stretch to think that women don't take advantage of it either.

      What it appears you want is to hear from people that lend credence and credibility to what you advocate for, without much if any rational and objective discussion or discourse -other than perhaps debating the subtleties and merits of one debilitating technique vs. another. You have lots of company on the internet for that it would seem.

      You continue to make irrelevant comparisons -as you do above to support many of your arguments, and comfortably avoid the issue I raise in your positions. Is a bullet wound less painful than a kick to the testicles? How is that germane to the point that was being made? Using your logic, one could say that amputating one arm of an assailant would be less harmful than amputating two, and strictly speaking, one might agree, and so the comparisons can descend further into the inane.

      So you know, your claim that groping a woman's backside qualifies as sexual assault is skating on pretty thin ice. Sexual assault is defined in law in almost every country on the planet, and I would not presume that an inappropriate act like that would meet that threshold based on most definitions.

      Speaking of making assumptions, how do you know that I don't already advocate for better firearm laws?

      Lastly, you claim that your blog is about justified female self-defense. Justified to whom? Anyone can construct their own moral framework, and justify-to themselves at least almost any response to any action they find offensive. You seem to be well-along that pathway, given the tone and nature of much of the content in this blog. If you ever find yourself in court, you may find imposing your own moral code on the state a little more challenging than you surmise.

      Delete
    18. Don't flatter yourself. It's a blog about what you believe is justified in women's self-defense, nothing more. It's simply what you assert based on your own values. Your posts elsewhere are even more vicious than some here.

      Delete
    19. I neglected to respond to your query about what I would do if a strange woman grabbed my crotch. Well, using the infamous Wendy book of self-defense, I would withdraw my VP9 (on a good day I can withdraw the handgun from an open-carry holster and fire one round on target in 0.810 seconds) and send her to the hospital or the morgue. Let's be very, very, clear; remember, the victim is NEVER responsible for what happens to the assailant, EVER. Correct Wendy? Now is not the time be be a hypocrite and cast your principles asunder....

      Delete
    20. Yes, you neglected my direct question, maybe you needed more time to rethink, that's fine, and are continuing neglecting it just you built another nice strawman to prove your point. In a real life situation a victim sometimes does not have luxury to carefully draft a legally correct and morally pristine response. It does not mean I support killing for groping, at the time I do not condemn kicking testicles of a perpetrator.

      Delete
    21. It would seem you don't condemn a hell of a lot. What direct question was that? Your standard strategy when called on one of your bizarre assertions is to pivot by saying something like, 'well men don't do (fill in the blank), or have you ever (fill in the blank)', and avoid responding to the substance of the statement presented.

      As I (and other men) have stated on this blog, you apply no objective standard to the actions you deem 'justified' - you actually believe because you have presented a certain action in general or in a specific circumstance, it is justifiable. It is pretty apparent that you have few if any boundaries on what you feel is acceptable and justifiable. You conveniently avoid being pinned down on this and many other related issues with the basic premise of this blog. I think that a very sadistic person lies not far beneath the exterior of the person you purport to be, and that inner self is much closer to the real you. Nowhere on this blog do you provide clear pronouncements regarding which circumstances you believe which of the specific self-defense techniques you and your mentor Linda promote the use of. It's one of the problems with the anonymity of the internet in general, where anything can be said with little to no accountability for saying it. I have no doubt that some day a woman will use one of your techniques in a situation that rational people (not you) in a formal setting will find unjustifiable by any reasonable standard. Sadly, that individual will (hopefully) pay a high price for her actions; unfortunately, the person that influenced her to do what she did (you) will not.

      Delete
    22. Face it, there's just not a long list of behaviours by women that you would ever condemn - as long as they are against a man at least.

      Delete
    23. Hey super smart American lawyer, why are you not answering my question about how would you response if a woman grabbed you there? I will not communicate with you any further if you do not answer such a simple question. Guns are misused, knives are misused, chairs are misused, but your only concern is a potential misuse of a woman's knee and the testicular safety issue. I wont play Freud how you like to play with me because it would not end up nice for you. However, I do have some empathy for your testicular anxiety. My blog is exactly what is needed. Do not teach women to kick testicles because they can misuse it, teach them to always carefully think about the appropriates of their response first is what we really do not need. In all of my 3 inspirational stories the women's response was appropriate to the severity of the situation (attempted rape). Maybe I surprise you now, yes I agree I should focus on these issues as appropriate settings and justifiability on my blog as well. My warm wishes.

      Delete
    24. I already did respond. Perhaps you need to learn how to locate and then read posts in your own blog...

      As far as 'communicating with me any further' is concerned, you overwhelmingly avoid responding to the comment men post on this blog - mine included, and when you do, you extract only selected elements of the comments to respond to, conveniently -and comfortably avoiding the rest. This isn't going to change. You have a certain view, and that is what you defend and advocate for. You have a lot of company on the internet for that Wendy. You pivot on numerous responses, as I have illustrated, and just ignore all the others at will. You believe your blog is 'exactly what is needed'. Believe what you will - everyone is entitled to that. Testicular anxiety? You need to (or at least should consider) growing up a little. So much of what you think you present on your blog as novel information is well-established fact. I've no idea what you think you mean by 'testicular anxiety'.

      You said: "Do not teach women to kick testicles because they can misuse it, teach them to always carefully think about the appropriates of their response first is what we really do not need". Really? Is this what you actually mean? Do NOT teach women about whether their response is appropriate? What kind of service do you think you are offering by saying that? As I have said numerous times, nobody - even women have the right to do whatever they please in a self-defense situation. Because this is what you believe, promote, and encourage has no bearing at all on what is considered by society - through their laws and legal remedies as acceptable. It's abundantly apparent to anyone reading this blog that you have very few-if any boundaries as to what you find as acceptable actions a woman can take against a male. I Am NOT just talking about the most horrific and egregious assaults like rape, but even things like groping a woman's backside or even inadvertent, but uninvited physical contact. YOU, like many, many others like you actively promote attacking a man's testicles, since this is a well-established anatomically available and very vulnerable part of a man's body. Even when a man gropes a woman's backside (does that mean 'touch', 'brush', 'grab', or all three?) your autonomic response recommendation is to kick him in the testicles. One can only presume that this is intended to cause as much pain, and possibly permanent injury as possible. There are obviously numerous other locations that she may hit, but the testicles are the most attractive item on your self-defense menu, always.

      I am often troubled by the cavalier and generally disrespectful manner in which you refer to men, and have commented on it on numerous occasion. Even the story of you using a belt to 'discipline' your boyfriend, and that sixth strike hitting him in the scrotum. You added an "LOL" in your post, as if it is hilarious when inflicting pain on someone - no less on an obviously vulnerable part of his anatomy. I would submit that most mature and responsible women would not find that acceptable. If they do, then all bets are off and the opposite gender has every right to view inflicting main on women as equally humorous.

      You constantly and with little restraint respond to comments on this blog by raising irrelevant assertions about other things being abused, or men thinking or doing/not doing X, as you have done here. It is a signature style of yours. Remember that it is you that is making all these pronouncements, and others are trying to take you to task for them - holding you accountable as a supposedly adult woman. It is your blog, and you have the luxury of deflecting/avoiding/not responding, which you most often do. That doesn't support your arguments or position, it just makes it easy for you to say what you like, with no accountability for saying it.

      Delete
    25. Lisa, your sad feeling is unnecessary. More and more girls and women have realized the weakness on men's body and willing to take advange of this point. As a man, I always encourage girls and young woman aroung me to implement kicking and squeezeing as much as possible to protect themselves to avoid sexual assault. In china, a large part of girls and young women don't understand clearly the advange and effect of strike a man's nuts. I have taught several female friends and their daughter self-defense technology and some of them have get benefit from it.

      On the other hand, every girl or woman that successfully kicked a boy in his nuts is full of satisfaction. In my point of view, a girl or young woman willing to kicking balls is sexy.

      mole

      Delete
  3. Testicles are the target of choice for many creatures in the wild when they have to fight. Males dominated human societies have tried for centuries to supress this natural instinct as part of their attempt to dominate women.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks a lot for your interesting comment. I made some research in this and I think one of the first recorded examples of possible attempts to suppress this primal instinct is from the ancient Greece. Pankration is an old Greece martial art with basically no rules. Even testicle strikes were allowed and apparently quite common, especially kicks. Women were not allowed to watch these matches. Historians claim it is because men wrestled naked. But what about the reason was because through watching these matches women would get the idea how super effective testicle strikes are?

      Delete
  4. Are you aware of a martial art (which I believe originated in India) that focusses entirely on attacking the testicles? I read about it years ago. It works on the premise that your opponent's testicles are always available to you, from any position, as long as you deploy the correct technique.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks for this comment. That's fascinating, but I am not aware of such a martial art. It would be nice to look it up. Many martial arts in the past, unlike today's versions, focused more on practicality and effectiveness than art or performance. These were systems developed to fight against dangerous opponents sometimes in life-death situations so targeting testicles was not taboo. Interestingly, there is a martial art thought to be developed as a defense system specifically for women - Wing Chun. One legend says, a Shaolin Temple abbess called Ng Mui taught this system to a young lady called Yim Wing Chun so she would be able to defend against "unwanted advances". Not a surprise, a groin kick is included.

      Delete
  5. I am not a self defense expert but I have watched many self defense classes and i have red many self defense articles and I would like to say that if a woman grabbed a man by the testicles from behind that would be the worst position a man could ever find himself in, just by grabbing, the man would be immobilize, he would be helpless, all his masculinity and his manhood would be in the woman's hands, at that time she would have a total control of him. It is like having a gun pointed at the back of his head or even worse, and if the woman started squeezing these testicles, it is gonna be like she pulled the trigger.
    African women are so smart and so brave to have such a great technique to defend themselves, I am so proud of them and I am pretty sure they have probably more effective technique.
    And I am so proud of you Wendy to share such a blog to empower women.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thank you so much for you comment. You are absolutely correct. For a man it is absolutely impossible to counteract this and a woman would have him fully in her hands. Literary :) The only option for him would be to beg for mercy. I am also proud of African women they invented and use such a powerful technique. We western women should get inspired by their spirit. I guess they have many more effective techniques as part of their armor. Also thank you for supporting me in this mission to empower women. Have a nice day, Wendy

      Delete
  6. Woman Makes Rapist Regret Entering Her Home, Bites Off Piece Of Him
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qxePVKdb69Y

    Woman bite man’s penis off for raping her
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iz46xpDQBKQ

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks, for the videos, nice examples of the application of biting. Wendy

      Delete
  7. Woman bites off would-be rapist's penis
    https://www.timeslive.co.za/news/africa/2015-07-02-woman-bites-off-would-be-rapists-penis/

    A woman cut off a man's penis after he tried to rape her
    https://www.cosmopolitan.com/uk/reports/a9904743/woman-cut-off-mans-penis-attempted-rape/

    17-year-old girl bites off penis of rapists
    https://dailypost.ng/2017/08/26/17-year-old-girl-bites-off-penis-rapists/


    Woman cuts off rapist’s penis, takes it to police as evidence
    https://omority.blogspot.com/2012/11/woman-cuts-off-rapists-penis-takes-it.html

    Woman bites off boss’ penis during attempted rape
    https://dailypost.ng/2016/09/20/woman-bites-off-boss-penis-attempted-rape/

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thank you for the list of these cases. I already wrote about the effectiveness of biting the penis, especially during oral sex in one post. It seems many girls and women around the world are aware of this. So rapists beware! Wendy

      Delete
  8. Y como las mujeres africanas..las primeras veces aprendieron como situarse y agarrar los testículos sabiendo que sería perjudicial para los violadores?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hola Adrian, seguro que tienen hombres dispuestos en los que pueden probar las técnicas por primera vez :) Wendy

      Delete
  9. Self defense lesson for women England
    https://tezfiles.com/file/649868e81db69

    ReplyDelete
  10. I'm sure this was very common back before recorded history, when people roamed naked or wore minimal clothing. If a man behaved badly while his testicles were swinging in the wind, this move would be very obvious and easy to execute!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hi, you made a very good point. One evolutionary theory says the testicles hanging outside are actually to give females an opportunity to fight back against males more easily. In the times people walked naked it would be even more apparent :) Regards, Wendy

      Delete
  11. To Combat Sexual Assault, Women Are Resorting to Electric Shock Underwear
    https://www.wired.com/story/to-combat-sexual-assault-women-are-resorting-to-electric-shock-underwear/

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hi, thank you for the link. Those things are quite inventive but often impractical and might not work all the time. I believe that the best approach to prevent rape for a woman is to attend a good self defense course like the one Linda leads. The Somali women cannot buy such fancy stuff yet they can defend themselves just by knowing where and how to attack the most vulnerable spot on a man's body. Regards, Wendy

      Delete
  12. Araweelo Somali legendary Ancient Queen
    https://medium.com/@ayaankhayre97/the-story-of-queen-ebla-awad-araweelo-is-one-that-is-not-often-told-in-western-society-and-72e853512580

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hi, thank you for the comment. These histories are not told often, which is a pity. It becomes clearer why Somali women know how to take care of themselves and are well aware of testicles as men's vulnerability and emasculation as a way to fight back. It is the legacy of Araweelo Queen :) Thanks again, Regards. Wendy

      Delete
  13. araweelo-somali-queen-gender-equality
    https://saxafimedia.com/araweelo-somali-queen-gender-equality/

    ReplyDelete