Sunday 28 March 2021

How I met Bob and Peter

Having a male assistant with good vibes makes a
 female self defense class an enjoyable experience. 
 In several places I already mentioned Bob and Peter, two brave college students majoring in physical education who volunteered to play bad guys for our course. We called them ‘our darling attackers’. I admit, we developed a very close relationship, almost an intimate bound. Here is how I recall my first encounter with Bob and Peter.

That day I changed my clothes in the lockers and entered the training room. I immediately spotted two young guys sitting on the bench. Rebeca and Ana, the boldest of us, were already having a friendly chat with them. The other shyer girls formed their own group, but from time to time were inquisitively checking out the two young hunky lads with a couple of inconspicuous glances. Before I had a chance to join the conversation club, Linda appeared in her black yoga pants and top.

Good evening girls,she started the session with a friendly greeting. My classmates stopped talking and we all gathered around her.  When the guys stood up, I noticed they both have athletic but not overly muscular bodies and are at least 180 cm tall. Peter is of darker appearance, he has short haircut and deep brown eyes radiating self-confidence. On the other hand, Bob’s curly blond hair and soft features of his fair face give him a look of an angel. Both had common gym clothes and sneakers on, Bob wore a dark blue T-shirt and black gym shorts and Peter a grey T-shirt and sweatpants.

Linda announced to us, “As I promised the last theoretical session, today we initiate the practical stage of the course and luckily, we won’t be alone. I want you to meet Bob and Peter. For the time of the course they will be my training assistants, but don’t be too nice to them.

After she introduced us to the boys, she continued, “Before we start putting the theory in practice, I prepared three small warm up exercises for you.  She opened her backpack and took out a bunch of sticky notes and pens and gave them to Laura with request to be distributed among the girls so each of us has one blue and one pink sticker. Linda then turned to Bob and instructed him, Bob, come here and grab me in a frontal bear hug. Not knowing what he can expect he hesitantly wrapped his hands around Linda’s torso but tried to keep a safe distance. Linda noticed his hesitation, Don’t worry, it’s just a demonstration. Although it did not sound like a very convincing reassurance, he took more courage and pushed her closer into him partially compressing her 36D bra-size boobs with his manly chest. Apparently Linda did not care and explained the task to us, Let’s imagine you are in this situation and you want to get rid of your attacker. Now this is the task for you: on a blue sticker first write the primary target organ or the attacker’s body area you would go after and then your body part would you use for the attack. On the pink sticker write the following target and again your body part to be used for executing the strike. If you are ready, place the stickers on the corresponding parts on Bob’s body. 

Where to put the pink sticky note?
The exercise seemed quite easy, most of us wrote it right away. We already got the idea about the primary and secondary targets. However, some hesitation and shyness became apparent when it came to the part with sticking the notes on Bob, especially the pink one. Soon, both Bob eyes was covered with blue stickers, just one appeared on his Adam’s apple and one on his ear. Most of us, including myself placed the pink sticker somewhere in area around his midsection or thighs, clearly avoiding putting it directly on the bulge projecting from his shorts. One sticker even landed on his belly depicting a big arrow pointing down!

All right, thank you, and now let me also do this assignment, said Linda and wrote the words ‘eyeball’ and ‘thumb’ on a blue sticker and put it on the Bob’s right eye. Then she wrote the word ‘testicles’ and ‘kneecap’ on a pink sticker. She bended over and suddenly with a quick motion of her left hand she pulled down Bob’s shorts and with the right hand she stuck the pink sticker on his dangling bare scrotum. The surrealism of the scene and the reaction of the spectators is indescribable. Poor Bob immediately half-squatted, turned around and pulled his pants up to cover his genitals.  (Un)fortunately by turning around he showed us his naked tight butt as well. Blushing like hell, he realized he forgot the note down there, so he fished it out, and not knowing what to do with it, he crumpled it and shoved it to his pocket.  Ana, Emma and Rebeca could not stop giggling, Susanne and Laura were covering their open mouths in astonishment what did they just witnessed and Tania, as always, left some ironic comment. Peter was maliciously smiling and seemed to be quite relieved not being a part of this embarrassing stunt. Only Linda kept a poker face like she just performed a completely normal basic demonstration. She explained, You all knew the theory, but you did not execute the assignment exactly according to my instructions. Yes, you all correctly specified the secondary target is his testicles, but there is no room for squeamishness and hesitation in self-defense. Also, some of you wrote groin instead of testicles. As I told you during the introductory lecture this is wrong and misleading. Don’t be ashamed to use the correct and exact wording like I always do.

When the buzz dissipated, Linda continued, Now let’s move on with the second exercise. Have you ever played a game called the ‘blind man’s buff’? We all nodded as we used to play it as kids. My rule of the game is that the ‘blind man’ should chase you around the room and if catches one of you and correctly identifies you it is your turn to be the blind man. Linda chose Tania to start as the blind man and blindfolded her using a red kerchief.  The game started with great amusement. It was hilarious to watch young adults screaming and chasing each other like they were 10-years-olds. When a girl caught a boy or when a boy caught a girl, we hold our breath in anticipation how it’s gonna turn out, if the touching won’t be too inappropriate or accidently directed to some ‘forbidden’ places. But I think at the end of the day no one’s decency was harmed. When it was my turn to be the blind man, I was ‘lucky’ and caught Bob. I immediately felt a strong young male body, and then I went for his hair and its curliness immediately uncovered his identity. I could have also probed his pants, but from the previous ‘exercise’ I knew he is hot wearing underpants, so I rather avoided that area :).

For almost a quarter of an hour we had a lot of fun, but suddenly Linda clapped her hands, OK guys this was the last round.  We were all laughing and gasping for air from all that shouting and fast zig zag movements. Linda commented this, “It is a nice warm up exercise, isn’t it? I somehow already anticipated this wasn’t just a silly game to fill up the time, but she again wants to teach us something. Indeed, she made a point, Self defense training is a close contact body-to-body physical activity. You should not be reluctant to touch and feel each other bodies. But I noticed this time you all did well and had fun. That’s good to see. Next important thing I wanted to point out with this exercise is the visualization, it is important to assess the opponent and to quickly draft the most effective defense strategy. You all met Bob and Peter just minutes ago, but you were able to image them from your memory and to distinguish one from another even without your sight. It is not that difficult to recognize a  male over a female body, but to identify who it is requires noticing, memorizing and recalling the details of the body when needed.

Who is going to win the tug of war?
And now let’s do the last exercise said Linda after she fetched a long rope from the closet and hanged it over a pulley on the wall. The middle of the rope had two flags tied in a 1-meter distance. She explained the game We are going to play a modified tug of war game. One girl against one boy. You have to hold the rope at the level of your chest. Who will pull the flag to their side is the winner. Men are naturally stronger than women, so we have to give our boys some penalty. Let’s say they can use only one hand and you both. This game became as much fun as the previous one. What started as a simple tug of war game, turned to a fight of genders. A loud screaming was resonating through the training room, girls were cheering the other girls and boys supported each other. Although the right arms of both boys’ were stronger than girls’ both arms, in some instances a girl took the lead.  It almost seemed Tania or Ana is going to win, but guys always managed to turn the tables and eventually won the tug.

When the last girl lost, Peter made a proud victory pose. Do not celebrate too early Peter, it’s my turn, said Linda while she put her water bottle aside and grabbed the rope. After the countdown, both pulled down with all their might.  Linda’s arms and hands are feminine, but the regular workout made them stronger than average. Everybody expected that Peter will have a hard time to win this time. After a minute or so of even tug, Linda suddenly freed her left hand, made a step forward and slapped Peter between his legs up to his bulge. He immediately cried out, jolted, let go the rope and covered his anguished manhood. Linda then, with a mischievous smile on her face slowly, without the slightest resistance, pulled the rope until the flag crossed her side.

She then turned to the giggling girl squad, You probably think what I did was unfair and vicious, and you are right. However, always remember, in female self defense there are no predetermined rules. Self defense is a goal-oriented response to a serious danger. You have to focus on achieving the task, neither the fairness nor the ‘gentleman rules’. He uses his natural strength against you, you can use his weaknesses to your advantage.  As Linda was lecturing the girls, Peter was slowly recovering but his angry face seemed he wants to yell at her ‘Bitch!’.  Susanne was holding him around his shoulders asking him how she could help. I always admired her being so caring for the boys’ wellbeing and safety.  When we were laughing and having fun, she was more interested in relieving pain, checking for injuries, and providing soothing words.

Once Linda finished her motivation talk, she announced the last activity of the day, All right, we had some fun, now let’s move on practicing the male anatomy and vital points with our new training dummies… 

182 comments:

  1. I must confess that like Peter, Linda would have also taken me by surprise: confident by my strength, and with my unprotected manhood.

    I wonder what angle he would have hit it with. If he would use the fist, the fingers, or the palm.

    But still great writing, Wendy. I congratulate you. I liked the way of exposing the different parts of the class - from the stickers, to the game, and the rope. With its corresponding morals-.

    Just as with the lesson of using the opponent's weaknesses against him - however little chivalrous they may be. After all, survival and defense do not understand about it.

    Again, I congratulate you.

    And I would like to add the layout and the different characters that have intervened - each with their respective personalities. A great pleasure.

    Happy week, Wendy.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hi Vil thank you, yes the class (and Linda) was full of surprises. I will write more about it. I will also start again to present the different techniques. Hopefully I finally manage to make an interview with her despite the current circumstances. She will for sure provide some interesting insights. Thanks for reading Vil and have a nice week too. Best. Wendy

      Delete
  2. Has Linda ever been attacked by a man?
    I wonder if her methods work,
    we should try it out, attack her :-)

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. As far as I know yes. And not just once. It was actually part of her work. And yes I guess she used her methods and they worked. Otherwise she wouldn't teach them to us. She knows her stuff, I wouldn't recommend to try it out. You could sustain some serious harm :) She will for sure provide some more insights in the interview I am planning to do with her. Wendy

      Delete
  3. Great post Wendy and Linda sure knows how to carry out training women for self defense. Great exercise in naming the targets on a actual male and also the natural weapon used against the target.

    Another good tip for self defense is surprise and not telegraphing what you intend to do or strike. In addition, using the weakness against the attacker striking a weak point (genitals) of the attacker when he least expects it.
    Whether it is a dirty move or not , in self defense anything goes with the main objective of the defender escaping unhurt and having a chance to escape.

    Keep up the great post Wendy and hope one day you can interview Linda.
    Charlie


    .

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hi Charlie, Thanks a lot. You are absolutely right. Not telegraphing, taking the attacker by surprise and striking his most sensitive part is the key. Poor Peter did not see it coming. It hurt both his ego and his testicles :) Dirty fighting is a part of female self defense whether we like it or not. Have a nice day, Wendy

      Delete
  4. You are just not knitting with both needles, are you Wendy? Sad, but you're not the only nutter with a blog like this...

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. No, I do not knit at all. I am not a grandma yet :) If you have suggestions for some good female self defense blogs I would be happy to paste it here. We can expand our discussion and exchange our experiences and knowledge :)

      Delete
  5. Too bad Peter just didn't knock her fucking head off for striking him -the bitch deserved it too!

    Fucking CUNT!!!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Ho, ho, ho Who is now suggesting a disproportionate response to an attack? Hmm? I thought you are a gentleman hating injustice and unfairness and supporting the rights of attackers.

      Delete
  6. Congratulations Wendy - by unanimous vote, you've been selected as the BIGGEST BITCH of the year (2020). Your pal Linda was a runner-up, just so you know...
    :-)

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. You guys are back! Thank you for the nomination. I thought the biggest bitch of the year 2020 would be the coronavirus. Will there be any official ceremony and real prize etc.? I awarded The Biggest Dickheads of 2020 prize to you and your pals as a group.

      Delete
    2. Nope. The coronavirus isn't capable of conscious thought, regardless of its sinister nature. YOU on the other hand serve no useful purpose (just like the coronavirus), but are-at least in theory, possess a cognitive function. Send me your email address and I will send you your Certificate of Achievement...

      Oh, we are know referring to you as "Filter Queen Wendy". Fitting, don't you think -:)

      Delete
    3. Filter Queen Wendy! wow sounds like a hardware store commercial.
      You can always contact me and send me things via the contact form at https://femaleselfdefense.sport.blog
      I would like to have a chat about your cognitive functions.

      Delete
  7. That is so rude! I don’t understand why Linda thinks she has the right to do that to explain her point. There is no reason that could justify what Linda did. I’m pretty sure if Peter and Pop knew what Linda was planning to do they would’ve knock her out. That was so rude and so unprofessional

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hi Mark, thanks for your comment. Do not jump too quickly to the conclusion that what she did was wrong, rude and unprofessional. Her task is to teach self defense to young woman. An important part of it is mental preparation and empowerment. She sought to break some kind of squeamishness every girl comes with to a self defense class. Sometimes it was unfair to Bob and Peter but it served the purpose. Don't worry they were not harmed. They ego, maybe :) So all what Linda did was actually quite professional. Both guys knew they wouldn't stand a chance against Linda, forget about some knocking out as a preventive action :) Wendy

      Delete
    2. I think there is noting rude or unprofessional about what Linda did, we really need to know the exact vulnerable parts of the male body, we've had enough of male self defense instructors that try to mislead us and use the term GROIN instead of TESTICLES. It would be even more professional if Linda grab each testicle and stick a little note on each one

      Delete
    3. Absolutely! :) 'Groin' is actually a structure to prevent beach erosion not a target for self defense :)

      Delete
    4. Yup, that would be nice of Linda - to 'grab' each testicle of her allegedly paid (aren't there employment laws in your third-world country) and stick a little note on each one. I am certain that Bob should really enjoy having that done to him. But, as long as Linda thinks it's for a purpose, anything goes..

      Delete
    5. That would be awesome! I think Wendy should start her own self defense class and i am pretty sure she would do that

      Delete
    6. Well I am not planning to start any self defense course, this blog is already enough. But if it ever happens I promise I do it this way in order to point out there are 2 testicles!. LOL The Canadian avenge squad will now tear me into pieces for what I just wrote.

      Delete
    7. Maybe they can not, i am assuming if they just read the idea they will probably be grabbing their testicles with both hands which will make them unable to react! LOL

      Delete
  8. What a load of crap. Your class engages in some idiotic tug of war tugging contest that has no connection with self-defense, and your heroine Linda assaults an allegedly paid individual by slapping him in the groin, to illustrate that 'in female self defense there are no predetermined rules'? She wasn't sparring with him, nor was she demonstrating a self-defense technique. So both guys 'knew' they wouldn't stand a chance against Linda, is that right? Why the hell would they think she would do what she did? What a seriously dysfunctional so-called self-defense course it was -If it took place at all, or as you claim it did.

    What exactly qualifies as 'harm' to you anyway? Permanent, disabling injury only? If that is the case, we would love to use you for our self-defense classes... No broken bones or internal injuries, but pretty much everything else is fair game...

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Please read my comment to Mark bellow. This approach is difficult to understand with your mindset and yes it is awkward and unfair to Peter and Bob, but it had some important purpose. Seeing is believing. If there was a regular sparing match hey wouldn't stand a chance either. Linda is a self defense and martial arts professional. Somebody not to mess with :) Wendy

      Delete
    2. It 'served' someone's perceived need. Using that as justification, there are few boundaries to what may be acceptable actions to do to someone else. Your position is ridiculous, as it often is. What she did is not defensible or reasonable to a rational person. Since you are not one yourself, and by your own admission have sadistic tendencies- especially (and likely solely) towards men, you will defend pretty much anything a woman does to a man, in almost any situation or context.

      Delete
    3. 'you will defend pretty much anything a woman does to a man, in almost any situation or context' where did I say that? You just fantasy about such a woman to support your twisted view on women (maybe because of some negative experience in the past?)

      Delete
  9. Of course they don't have a chance because Linda did not tell them the rules, she used cheap shot against Peter in a game that no one expected to get hit in the balls, and she pulled down Pop shorts is a surprising way just to embarrass him, she could have stick the note over the shorts. Embarrassing and unprofessional.! I don't know how Peter and Pop kept practicing with you in that class after what happened.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Mark, you just look at it with your male eyes. She could just say, take the attacker by surprise, right? She would make the same point. But this doesn't work that way. Would you like to learn driving a car just by verbal instructions? And just 'take my word for it' approach. Seeing how it worked for Linda and being a part of that situation for a moment (although awkward) is essential for deep priming. Being told to grab the attackers testicles and on the other hand to be too shy to even touch it wont help. Yes, they both stayed with us. They started as volunteers, but later got paid, thou. Wendy

      Delete
    2. Your comparison between learning to drive a car and the actions Linda took are idiotic. What a despicable individual you are Wendy.

      Delete
    3. Wow, you provided a lot of arguments in your comment. Hard to rebut them, indeed.

      Delete
    4. Speaking of specious arguments, your idiotic rationale to refute Mark's claim - 'you just look at it through your male eyes' is pretty typical for you. You simply avoid addressing the issue but making stupid claims like 'it was necessary for 'deep priming', or 'it had a purpose'. So, in essence, as long as you or Linda felt doing anything in that class 'had a purpose' -as defined by you or Linda, then the means are justified by that end.

      Small wonder you filter so many comments. And by the way, you should change your filters, they are likely clogged with deleted comments from what I have heard on other blogs...

      Delete
    5. Actually it is you who is making straw man fallacious arguments. I have never said Linda should be able to do anything she wants or what would serve any purpose. In your view it was inappropriate what happened to Bob and Peter, fine. In our view it was a controversial, but necessary part of our training and the 'harm' to Peter and Bob was an acceptable price against the gains, period, end of discussion.

      Delete
    6. 'In our view it was a controversial, but necessary part of our training and the 'harm' to Peter and Bob was an acceptable price against the gains, period, end of discussion.'

      It is? The price was 'acceptable' to you, since you didn't pay it, did you? What qualifies as 'harm' to you anyway Wendy? Permanent and/or disabling injury only? Funny how it's always easier to justify costs others bear when the benefits of causing that harm are enjoyed by others.... No hypocrisy here...

      Delete
    7. It is you who fails to define what 'harm' is for you. Is harm to offend someone? To engage in a physical activity involving pain?

      Delete
    8. I don't understand the reason behind all these kind of hate comments from men, how don't they get that the purpose of the whole blog is women safety and women self defense, even though some technique could cause a little bit of pain or embarrassment, still the goal here is that women could protect themselves.
      I have an example that might make it easier for men to understand the purpose of such an awesome self defense class.
      Imagine if you see a man attacking a woman on the street, I am sure that most of us ( men and women ) would immediately try to help that woman evan though that might result we get a hit or a punch from the attacker, still that cost (pain) is justified because it serve the purpose ( woman safety ). The same thing could be applied to the self defense class, all these self defense technique might cause some pain and embarrassment ( cost), It is also justified to achieve the goal ( women safety ). I don't know if I can make it easier than that!
      Over all, I think that Peter and Pop see it that way, and we should be thankful that both of them participate in your self defense class, we need more men to understand that women safety is a big issue and to overcome that we need more men like Peter and Pop, who are not ashamed of the vulnerability of their testicles and they are welling to provide their bodies and their knowledge to women self defense classes. also, we need more women like you Wendy to help other women around the world regarding women safety.
      Thank you

      Delete
    9. Dear Sarah, thanks a lot for this comment. I could not formulate it better. It is a great example with the helping other woman under attack. Yes sometimes a sacrifice involving pain is necessary for a good cause. I am glad Bob and Peter took this sacrifice. This is the true desired masculinity and gentlemanship. Evan take some notes. Thank you again Sarah for your support. Wendy

      Delete
  10. Garbage -again. The so-called activity was NOT related to a self-defense technique. Your buddy Linda intentionally embarrassed and demeaned him for her own benefit. Similar with the groin slap. That was totally unrelated to a self-defense technique. You are almost completely devoid of the capacity for rational thought if you think otherwise.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. No it is you who cannot think out of the box. This is not a male self defense class. You always relate to things how they work for you men. He volunteer to be a part of self defense class and this is a part of the training. Sorry. The only one who is in a real danger is you and your pals. I really worry you'll get a heart attack from reading my blog. You guys should calm down. Wendy

      Delete
  11. Women's self-defense classes are not bestowed with the divine right to do anything they want to male participants, under the guise of some skewed rationale. Think out of the box? LOL.. I see, so if as an paid 'attacker' Bob or Peter concealed a knife of handgun into the class and bled Linda (or you) out during one of your training scenarios, that would be a good example of them thinking outside of the box. I would certainly support that... -:)

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. You nicely showed you are the one with twisted thinking and hypocrisy, shooting someone for gently slapping the testicles or for pantsing someone. I smell sadism.

      Delete
    2. You said: 'After a minute or so of even tug, Linda suddenly freed her left hand, made a step forward and slapped Peter between his legs up to his bulge. He immediately cried out, jolted, let go the rope and covered his anguished manhood.'

      Gently slapping his testicles you say? She shouldn't have touched him at all. Pulling his pants down, exposing his genitals to all present -you're telling me he was told that doing such a thing was 'part of the training'? Such lies you tell Wendy...

      Delete
    3. How do you think a self defense class should look like? Like a dancing class or a discussion club. Of course there is physical contact involved. And yes shots to the testicles is an essential part of self defense so it somehow logically occurs during the course. So if you sign up as a male assistant for a female self defense class do not expect otherwise. If you would like to do ballet do not expect there wont be any pain involved. I doubt Bob has now PTSD because we saw his genitals, there was definitely nothing he should be ashamed of :)

      Delete
    4. I see again! So pulling down a 'training assistant's pants to expose his genitals to the female class is a necessary part of self-defense is it? Do you have any idea how stupid you sound making that claim?

      Delete
    5. It shouldn't look like it involves a paid 'training assistant' being slapped in the testicles when the activity underway at that time had nothing whatsoever to do with teaching a self-defense technique, but some idiotic tug of war competition... Nor should it involve intentionally embarrassing one of the 'training assistants' by pulling his pants down to show the gawking females his genitals. Because YOU think it's acceptable is hardly a compelling reason on its own. One could say that if Peter or Bob randomly slapped, punched, or kicked one of the female participants would also 'serve a purpose', since it would certainly illustrate in a realistic way that women need to be vigilant and expect the unexpected in self-defense. Sounds VERY purposeful to me...

      Delete
    6. Well you can organize your self defense classes as you wish. For you it is simply hard to imagine someone uses a more unorthodox approach. It is like saying painful stretching during a ballet training should be forbidden regardless of the actual purpose. Sure such a ballet training can exist, nobody is in pain and somehow the ballet will be done.
      BTW, yes we had such sessions when Bob and Peter made an unexpected attacks and we had to defend. It also has, as you correctly pointed out, a good purpose.

      Delete
  12. Poor Wendy, it does seem that not everyone supports what you think is an acceptable way to treat men... Why don't you just admit the obvious - you're a man hater, and likely always have been...

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. No I am not a manhater, I have a loving boyfriend. But you are misogynists and you don't want to admit. Spamming a woman's blog with hateful comments and recently with death threads is very woman loving indeed. Very noble and gentleman behavior. I wanted here to write a psychology profile of you and your pals but did not. Readers of this blog are not interested in you and your opinions. Get some life and most importantly get a girlfriend. That unused testosterone is just damaging your brain. You see sadistic bitches everywhere.

      Delete
    2. You claim to have 'a loving boyfriend' - meaning I presume that he loves you. Do you think he would still love you if you were honest with him about your fake testicle exam, and told him about this blog? For most rational people, honesty is an important character trait; I think it's likely your boyfriend may seriously reconsider whether he would want to be involved with someone that behaves like you and believes what you do...

      Delete
    3. Oh, and to correct your false assertion, we only see 'a' sadistic bitch when we visit this blog. :-)

      Delete
    4. You men are very keen on honesty when considering as a woman's character trait but other way not so much. I know you all preachers quite well. My boyfriend also doesn't share everything with me. I found out that last time when I was not around he watched porn. Should I break up with him because of it? Maybe we appreciate other traits in each other than some phony honesty. And I am pretty sure he would forgive me the fake testicle exam which somehow bothers you more than him.

      And it is quite fascinating you come to this blog all over again just to see a sadistic bitch.

      Delete
  13. I am curious, were Bob and Peter actually told of the types of things that would be done to them PRIOR to agreeing to participate (either as volunteers or paid workers) in these classes? It seems highly likely they were not.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Bob and Peter were smart enough to somehow anticipate that by signing up for a female self defense class as male training assistants, different kind of shots to their testicles will be involved. They had an option to leave. Nobody put them in chains.

      Delete
    2. Of course, both Bob and Peter would somehow also know that wearing protection would not be part of their 'training assistant' role, correct? What a sick bitch you truly are Wendy.

      Delete
    3. They wore protection when needed. It wasn't necessary their first class with us.

      Delete
  14. Is that what Linda called Bob and Peter- training dummies? How respectful of her. I can only imagine what she is like as a human being. You two have so much in common it seems. Small wonder she is your heroine.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. You got a bad impression. She liked Bob and Peter as much as we girls did. Sometimes she was very kind to them, but sometimes she acted like a tough military officer. But she never abused them. And it all had a purpose which is quite difficult to understand.

      Delete
    2. She never abused them? Really? even when - according to you she admitted what she did on at least one occasion was vicious? It's quite difficult to 'understand' because a lot of it is nonsensical.

      Delete
    3. There is a difference between being tough, strict and maybe viscous and abusing someone. Do trainers of sports or military officers abuse because they are tough?

      Delete
  15. Bad impression? LOL I merely used your own words as you described what took place and what was said. She referred to the two 'training assistants'- two young men she 'liked very much' as you claim, as training dummies.

    You like to claim that they were 'never abused'. Really? Even Linda -according to you, said that what she had done was 'unfair and vicious'. That doesn't meet your threshold for abuse. If so, what does? According to you these two men were kicked hard enough in the groin several times at least to require them to take time out and get ice -so kind of you. You stated you 'accidentally'(of course...) struck one of them in the throat hard enough that they temporarily had trouble breathing. To you, abuse is how you define it- so what would qualify as abuse here? Not Linda slapping him hard enough in the groin for him to have pretty strong reaction in a situation that had nothing to do with demonstrating a self-defense technique. Not striking one of them in the throat, obviously, and not pulling their shorts down (they should obviously expect that to be part of a female self-defense class, right?). Would even castration during this training or serious/permanent injury even qualify as abuse to you?

    Your sadistic tendencies -as you admit you have, which is obvious, are oozing out of you...

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Dudes, for you it must be like to have second Christmas when I allowed the anonymous comments again, isn't it? All of the things Linda did has a strong connection to female self defense, but I do not blame you for not understanding that, you are men. Yes self defense has to be realistic. Ballet dancers are not abused when they have to do painful stretching. If you voluntary do certain activity this often brings pain and sometimes embarrassment. It is so strange a woman should teach men in this. Linda called them training dummies. Inappropriate, maybe. I have been called in comments I receive all sorts of vulgar expressions, from sadistic bitch to cunt and skank and hag. Inappropriate? definitely not for you, pristine morality preachers.

      Delete
  16. Does Linda have a website?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. No, the self defense course is not public it is organized by the department of physical education just for the female students. She is on social media but I have to protect her privacy. I don't want her to receive all the hateful and abusive comments as I do. If you have any question to her, I am happy to ask her for you.

      Delete
  17. Great post Wendy. I think the self defense you are talking about might be one of the best self defense classes.It sounds so unique and professional, i hope we have many more self defense classes like this one in the future because i believe it is on another level.
    Second, i don't know why many male commentators here seems so angry, i mean is is just a self defense blog. Are they feeling bad for Peter and Pop? I am pretty sure Peter and Pop were not force to be assistants, also i am sure this kind of job really help them financially and probably mentally and physically as well.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thank you so much for this great post. I wish more commenters were so well reasoned as you. Well, as you can see, in this world even an effective female self class can stir extreme controversies, so I do worry we wont see more classes like this in the future.

      No, Bob and Peter were not forced and I am pretty sure they enjoyed helping us and receiving a lot of attention from us ladies :) For them it was just another type of workout and at the same time they were making some extra cash. For some people this is simply a huuuge problem. Thanks for your support. Wendy

      Delete
    2. What kind of 'attention' do you think they 'enjoyed' - getting kicked/punched/kneed in the testicles, being demeaned and abused by Linda, or sitting with ice on their testicles in severe pain while some hag sits beside them, interrogating them about the nature of the pain they were experiencing?

      Such lies Wendy, but they flow from you so naturally...

      Delete
    3. I told you Evan, find yourself a girlfriend so you would feel 'attention' from a woman.

      Delete
  18. I see you are pretty much filtering every post that doesn't agree with your views on everything you say. That isn't surprising. You really should go into politics. You have this down to an art form...

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I have to filter the posts otherwise the blog would be flooded with hatred, vulgarism, misogynism-containing extremely repetitive posts. As you can see I try to accept and argue with opposite opinions as much as possible. What a value for readers would be to have a comment just calling me a bitch? Which party should I join BTW? :)

      Delete
    2. Pero simplemente bloquealos!!..no vale la pena razonar con ellos, no entienden la finalidad de este sitio.. Y se sienten ofendidos.. No entres en el juego de ellos.. Que es discutir.. X otro lado ánimos con este blog.. Que es muy interesante.

      Delete
    3. Muchas gracias Adrian. No es posible bloquearlos. Quiero permitir que todos puedan publicar comentarios. ¡Que tenga un lindo día! Wendy

      Delete
  19. Of course, conveniently missing a lot of details does help present this in a different light, doesn't it? Just 'another type' of workout was it? Really Wendy? Getting kicked in the testicles is hardly a common aspect of most employment relationships. You stretch credulity well beyond the breaking point in your blog...

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Well a job description of a female self defense training assistant often contains a clause about the kicking in the testicles :) No I am not naïve and I acknowledge that a kick to the testicles is painful and pantsing can be embarrassing. But you solely focus on this aspect. It was Bob's and Peter's choice to come and STAY with us. Whatever you do there are always benefits and losses.

      Delete
    2. If kicking a man in the testicles wasn't painful to excruciatingly so, you likely wouldn't have this blog, and your training class would be much more problematic without the anatomical vulnerability males have that is so much the focus of your existence. Pantsing 'can be embarassing'? Really Wendy? Have you lost all sense of decency for anyone other than women?

      I have to say I am truly surprised that Bob didn't simply walk out from that session when Linda pulled his shorts down or when she slapped his testicles. He was treated disrespectfully and cruelly by her, and she should have faced serious consequences.

      Delete
    3. Well I did not create this male vulnerability. The Nature did. If men didn't attack women this blog would be obsolete.

      Maybe Bob and Peter felt they should continue as it is their duty. Soldiers are also not treated the kindest way possible.

      Delete
  20. Was that 'attention' you refer to when you generously offered to retrieve and/or provide ice to Bob or Peter when they were in pain from being kicked in the testicles?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yes, for example. But not only that. We liked them a lot and we tried to make them feel comfortable in all-female class. It was not only about testicle kicks and unexpected pantsings as you tend to think.

      Delete
    2. It wasn't? Perhaps you're correct. I note that you did mention that the female students did scenarios with both men while they (the men) were completely naked, which involved squeezing their testicles. You also mentioned that you had struck one of them in the throat during a training scenario, so I presume that the other female participants did this as well.

      Did the 'job description' for the training assistant position mention that the 'successful applicant' would have their testicles kicked, squeezed, and slapped, and they would be struck in the throat, and they may also expect to have their shorts and underwear pulled down so their genitals would be exposed to the female participants?

      I'm curious if the contract (if there was an actual, real contract) included a disclaimer or hold harmless clause, prohibiting the 'worker' from seeking damages if they were seriously injured?

      Delete
    3. Was that act (providing ice) considered by Linda or others as an unfortunate necessity in order to have your two training dummies stay there for the rest of the class?

      Delete
    4. Linda said: 'For the time of the course they will be my training assistants, but don’t be too nice to them.' It certainly looks like Linda set the standard for 'not being too nice'...

      Delete
    5. I will make an interview with Linda and she will explain how she advertised the position and how she chose Bob and Peter. What I know they had a prior discussion what's going on at the course, how detailed etc. I don't know. I do not know if there was a formal contract. I can ask her.

      No the act of providing ice was the act of care, appreciation and empathy.

      They were sought to play attackers, you cannot be too nice in such scenarios otherwise the training is for nothing. That's what Linda meant by saying that.

      Delete
    6. 'Appreciation' for letting a woman kick them in the testicles? Based on at least your own comments from offering/administering ice to the testicles of one of the training dummies after they were kicked there, it was also an opportunity to bathe in joy you received from inflicting pain to a man from kicking him in that part of his anatomy. Sitting directly next to him, asking him questions about how much it hurt? That was just creepy. The prime motivation for offering the ice at all was related to self-interest in having the two guys continue to be involved in that training, and limit the amount of time they were unavailable to the female students. Your claim about care and empathy would have been secondary considerations, at best.

      Delete
    7. No doubt Linda is intentionally vague and misleading in her 'job advertisements' and doesn't mention at all some of the more demeaning and viscous things she does to her 'training dummies'. Honesty would likely result in a lack of applicants...

      Delete
    8. Trying to convince the male readers of your blog that you genuinely cared about the physical well-being of your two 'training dummies', beyond the direct self-interest you and the others had (Linda included of course) of trying to keep them from leaving that great temporary employment early?

      Delete
    9. Well yes there were some more practical considerations why to use the ice packs beyond our affection for Bob and Peter :)

      Which job advertisements are too honest, right. :)

      Yes, why do you think we did not cared. Yes, sometimes we inflicted pain, but it was an essential part of the training. So you would never hit a sparing partner during a boxing training?

      Delete
    10. For you, self-interest rules the day. You find it funny that they were in serous pain from the injuries you and other women inflicted on them, and of course having the opportunity to observe them in such pain was an added bonus and major motivation for offering ice in the first place. You also find humor in a job advertisement being deceptive when it involves men being used in a women's self-defense course. And you're still not a misandrist though, correct??

      Delete
    11. Manipulating someone's feelings - for any reason, let alone the self-interest you displayed around giving ice to two young guys who were likely in pretty severe pain at the time, and sitting next to them to ask them about how they felt and observe their reactions is just really unsettling. Perhaps many women would do as you did. That doesn't make it any less creepy...

      Delete
    12. So would you do in that situation? So the best would be not to offer any ice and to leave them alone as it was just their problem?

      Delete
    13. That isn't the point - or the issue. Given all the other information you have provided about what went on during that course, providing ice to a worker that was in serious pain from being kicked in the testicles intentionally (yes, I'm aware that this was the objective) seems the minimally humanly decent thing to do in the circumstances. What troubles the hell out of me is a good part of that decision was completely unrelated to genuine concerns for their physical well-being alone, and much more a function of concern for the negative impact on the course if they could not continue - or chose not to continue. Also, you made comments about being right beside one of them while they sat with ice under their balls, asking about how much it hurt, etc. I find that creepy as hell, It's as if you took joy in what you did, and wanted to get confirmation from what should have been obvious to anyone that the guy was in real pain. From a humanistic perspective, such behaviour is hardly flattering of you - or any other female student that did something similar. It's like they were truly seen as 'training dummies', and the female students -and Linda, simply stopped seeing them as human beings.

      Delete
    14. Well what should I say. Bob and Peter were human beings for us. If we ever had to cause pain to them it was for a good purpose. I think they also understood it that way. Self defense training brings such maybe a little bit 'creepy' situations. I sat to him and talk to him to mitigate the discomfort. And yes I was a little bit curious about the sort of pain I have never experienced. What's wrong in that?

      Delete
    15. I thin it is likely that the inquiries you made with them while sitting beside them, enjoying seeing the effects your actions had on them were made with the intention of gaining additional information to further increase the effectiveness of your self-defense techniques. There is a certain sadism in doing what you did - given the sensory effects of being struck hard in the testicles, I am confident in saying that talking to him did literally nothing to ease his pain. What it did do is give you an excuse to sit there and make seemingly innocent inquiries about the nature of the pain/sensations he was feeling, under the guise of showing legitimate concern for him. THAT is that is creepy.

      Delete
    16. Overall, it is reminiscent of what happens in some labs, but in this case, Bob and Peter were the lab 'rats'...

      Delete
    17. Well it might sound cruel but yes, if you already caused pain to your subject, you want to get as much research done as possible :)

      Delete
    18. I am kind of curious what kind of conversation happened in that situation? what kind of question ddi you ask them? what were their answers?

      Delete
    19. Here are some guesses...
      1. How much does it hurt on a scale of 1 to 10?
      2. Do you feel weak and inferior compared to women now?
      3. Please tell me how I could have caused you even more pain?
      4. Do you think I could have ruptured your testicles if my technique was better?
      5. Don't you feel stupid for agreeing to volunteer for this training?
      6. Did you really think that the job description for this work would be truthful?

      Delete
    20. I was just curious what kind of pain (dull, sharp, throbbing etc.) it is and whether it is true it hurts in stomach. He say it hurts there and I did what I do when I have period cramps I gently rubbed the region above his pubes and his stomach with my hand. It wasn't like a magical cure but seems it helped a little. Am I again a sadist for doing that?

      Delete
    21. All really important information that a woman would want to know before kicking a man in the testicles in self-defense of course. Knowing that it's extremely painful and often debilitating, and to get the hell away from the attacker asap is not enough information apparently. You should have insight into the nature of the pain and how the pain radiates through the male body.

      What bullshit. Your interest reflected your sadist nature-the primary reason you would have done what you did (rubbed his stomach) was to justify sitting beside him longer so you could enjoy the pain he was experiencing and wallow in your success in causing it.

      Delete
    22. If you think so Dr. Freud than probably it was like that :)

      Delete
  21. 'I wish more commenters were so well reasoned as you.' Translation: "I wish every commenter agreed with me like you do...'

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Well for you is the same no. You also wish every female self defense blogger agreed with you. Otherwise you would not spam this blog with comments expressing un ultimate rage.

      Delete
    2. Female self-defense bloggers - you included, rarely agree with anyone other that other female self-defense bloggers - and other women. I don't waste my time expecting people like you to change their views -or values. That isn't why I bother attempting to post on this blog... I have seen many of your posts on other female self-defense blogs - you're sadistic nature shines through, that is obvious...

      Delete
    3. I do not get it. Why do you waste time attempting posting on this blog?
      You are entitled to have your opinion, the same way as I do. But this is my blog.
      Look Evan I told you already, you are a decent but a little bit naïve and delusional guy you should find (i) a different hobby (ii) and a nice girlfriend. Your Wendy

      Delete
  22. Am I the only one who think Peter and Pop are braver than most male commenters here?
    I mean I already know that testicles are so sensitive but it seems that boys personalities and feeling are as much sensitive as their testicles!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. You are definitely not the only one :), I also think they are much braver than these wimps. I hurt their delicate male feelings because I dare to say testicles.

      Delete
    2. Because you women don't know how embarrassing this subject could be for us (men).
      It is so so embarrassing when we are considered big and strong and macho but all of that has no benefit if we get a little hit to the testicles, the organ that represent the masculinity is so sensitive and vulnerable. We feel like we fail to fulfill the masculinity.

      Delete
    3. Thanks for your comment. Well yes I got this paradox. You men simply have to live with it there is a flaw in your body design :) Or actually it is not a flaw but a feature to be explored by us women! :) But remember masculinity can be manifested by different ways. Regards Wendy

      Delete
    4. Really? As the self-appointed expert on masculinity, who constantly prattles on in support of what most informed, rational women would see as dated and problematic male behaviors, how do you think masculinity should be manifested? If your view is to be subservient to females-as in your preference for matriarchal societies, I think you should just feel free to fuck off....

      Delete
    5. Evan you are the best example how masculinity should not be manifested.

      Delete
  23. I don't get it tho, what is wrong with the term TESTICLES!? why does it hurt them?
    Aren't testicles part of their bodies? Don't they love their bodies and their testicles?
    what if we use other terms like balls, nuts, eggs, gonads, plums.. etc does that hurt their feeling as much as TESTICLES ?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I also don't know why! It is the correct medical term. I can alternate the terms if it makes them feel better :) Testicles, hmm sorry balls are amazing organs producing thousands of sperm cells per second. Men should be proud of such incredible little factories. Well, it somehow happened that these organs are also quite sensitive and can be exploited as a target for self defense. It is not my fault.

      Delete
    2. It doesn't 'hurt them (men)' if she uses the correct term- she is fabricating this...

      Delete
    3. Good to know. Otherwise we could use it as another 'noncontact' self defense technique. Just to yell Testicles! and they are on their knees. We discussed this already with Lise in one of the old posts.

      Delete
    4. Maybe it doesn't hurt them physically but it might hurt them emotionally. I think the term testicles really hit the nerve, it works as a reminder for all males that they have such a weakness dangling between their legs, no matter how much they workout and how much muscles they grow, still the testicles make them feel vulnerable and weak.

      Regarding terminology, please Wendy don't listen to them. keep using the correct term which is testicles. I feel that these males trying the same movement that male self defense instructors use in which they try to manipulate us to use other terms like "groin" or "below the belt" or "between the legs" just to mislead females and make us avoid targeting the testicles.

      Delete
    5. Hmmm... perhaps both men and women can acknowledge what is rather well-established fact, that men cannot 'strengthen' their testicles like they can other parts of their anatomy, and women cannot strengthen their breasts in a similar manner. Not much of a revelation, is it?

      Delete
    6. Dear Amanda, thanks a lot for your support. Yes the testicles is a symbol of their masculinity and their greatest weakness at the time. You cannot find more paradoxical example like that. All that indirect terms are just shying away from clearly specifying the real target. I haven't heard anybody saying poke him below the forehead or kick him in the midsection of the leg. So yes I will keep saying testicles. No nuts, no balls, no cojones, no bits, no eggs, no plums, no family jewels, no 'down there', no groin, no bellow the belt.... Cheers Wendy

      Delete
    7. No we cannot strengthen eyes, nose, kneecaps... So yeah I fully acknowledge that :)

      Delete
    8. Great to hear Wendy...from your favorite nemesis!

      Delete
    9. Also don't forget that using the term testicles makes it easier to understand for people that english is their second language.

      I just saw your discussion with Lisa and i can tell you that i am fascinated with the idea of having "noncontact self defense technique". I don't know if it is possible or not but It sounds amazing. Could you explain it a little bit more? do you have any studies or confirmed information about it?
      Cheers

      Delete
    10. Hi Amanda, that's true we definitelly did not learn all those synonyms for testicles in my English classes. LOL.

      Maybe you noticed that men cringe in pain when see other men hit in the testicles. This is some kind of transmitted effect. It would be interesting to research it more and how to use it for self defense. I haven't seen any studies done on this subject yet. Maybe some readers could help in this. Ideally a woman would be able to defense herself just using the right words without making any contact with the attacker. Like a powerful spell :)

      Delete
    11. Hey Wendy,
      Yes i have noticed that men cringe or cover their testicles when seeing other men getting hit in the testicles but i never thought about it.
      Thanks Wendy

      Delete
  24. It's ok Wendy, you can use the term testicles as much as you want. Here's a classic example of all the filtering you do so you can amplify stupid statements like this. There are no posts I have found where ANYONE suggests you can't or should not use the word testicles. Here's an opportunity for you to practice what you always preach and let this one go...

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. That's very kind of you I can use the correct term. That comment was just a hyperbolic humorous reaction to a comment saying that testicles is my favorite word and I overuse it. Do you understand a little bit of humor and irony?

      Delete
    2. Good try, but no cigar Wendy. Nobody cares whether you use the correct anatomical terms or not. It isn't threatening to anyone but you. Feel free to use whatever you wish. Fill your boots.

      Delete
    3. Thank you that's very generous from you. :)

      Delete
    4. I like your humor Wendy, at times.. :o). Since you have now stated that you will always use the correct anatomical term,(I won't state it again..no need) this one issue can be put to rest by all, and the next mountain of disagreement/debate can be taken on...

      Progress!

      Delete
  25. No doubt you won't post this, but I am pretty certain-since I keep copies of all the messages I submit, that at least one male has previously said that you are free to call testicles...testicles. I have NO idea - other than the obvious rather idiotic reason why you would be repeating this claim.

    Grow up.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. It seems I am not the only one who has to grow up. But OK from now on I will use the term 'family jewels'. It signifies more their procreation value. (irony off).

      Delete
    2. NOPE. We male readers of this blog refuse to nominate you for the Most Passionate Female Self-defense Advocate Woman of the Year award unless you use the correct anatomical terms (which you should, as you know, really).
      I am fine with calling testicles, testicles. I also agree than men teaching female self-defense classes should use the proper term -TESTICLES, NOT groin, etc. as well.

      How's that, my most favorite online adversary ever - Wendy? :-)

      Delete
    3. Don't be fearful that we may agree on a lot more than you think. We will still have lots to debate; I wouldn't want you to start hating me any less...:-)

      Delete
    4. Oh, and I DO NOT hate you - repeat, DO NOT hate you, just so you know...

      So there! :o)

      Delete
    5. I still need to protect my 'testijewels' though, if that's ok... :o)

      Delete
    6. Thank you Evan, I appreciate that. We strangely starting to understand each other. I do not hate you Evan at all. You are just a little bit delusional, but otherwise a very passionate men's rights supporter. Wendy

      Delete
    7. LOL. Delusional. Really? Here's a great claim that we could discuss and then at least have a clear understanding on the basis for why you hold that view. The better we understand each other, the better for both of us Wendy.

      And, I support men's rights.. I DO NOT support men assaulting women (in ANY way, shape, or form). Is that helpful to you?

      Perhaps that answers one of the questions you have on your list...

      Delete
  26. What IS your fault is all the contradictory, evasive, and inflammatory invective you post on your blog... Not to mention the hypocrisy, which looms rather large...

    Darla Kenzie, USA

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Dear Darla, I do not know which of my statements are 'contradictory, evasive, and inflammatory'. You have to learn that not everything you do not like or do not agree with is against you. You exhibit a clear evasive behavior; you haven't answer any of my questions. You spam my blog with personal invective attacks. Still I like you guys, you just seem to be too immature and too sensitive.

      Delete
    2. For your readers, it's literally impossible for them to determine on their own if any of your posters answered any of your questions, since you and only you decide what you allow to appear on this blog and what you do not.

      If you have the courage, why don't you post a series of clearly stated questions, and I will answer them honestly. You may be surprised that we agree on many more thing than you think we do Wendy...

      Please do Wendy-please- I welcome the open dialogue. Really.

      Delete
    3. Your blog might be less exciting (for some) with fewer things to argue heatedly about (after you know my views on things you are interested in hearing my views on - if any). But, you won't thereafter need to waste time musing about what I actually believe, since you'll know..., and we can debate other stuff for a change :-)

      Delete
    4. I can easily do that.
      1. How did you find this blog?
      2. Why don't you give me a chance to comment on your blog/forum?

      We can start with these 2 very easy questions. Then we can discus more complicated stuff.

      Delete
    5. 1. I found your blog in a research paper on misandry. It was also referenced in an academic website on violence against men.

      2. You haven’t bothered to find my blog and post on it. Blame yourself.

      Delete
    6. A normal commenter would paste a link. Oh, wait there is no such a paper, am I right Evan?

      Delete
  27. 1. Someone sent me the link. It was a woman - yes, really.

    2. I don't have a blog. Truly. IF I do create one, I WILL DEFINITELY send you the link. I am not afraid of other opinions, and you definitely have valuable, informed opinions to share.

    Do you really, truly think that I think it is acceptable for men to assault women Wendy? Seriously??

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Good, thank you I believe you, I wont investigate further. The other angry commenters are part of a group. No I definitelly do not think that you think it is acceptable to assault women. We just do not understand each other in one fundamental thing. This blog is unfortunately not intended for you. It hurts you and then it also hurts me.

      Delete
  28. I DO NOT intend to hurt you Wendy. With respect, I DO think that you benefit from seeing opposing views, which may prompt you to reflect on your own. It is not for me to change your mind -you're entitled to your opinions, absolutely. Like all of us, we have a responsibility to one another, and I think that given the nature of the subject matter on your blog, you have a duty to be prudent in what you say. Again, you can say what you like -it is your blog, but I think that you're a smart woman that is able to consider other views, even if you don't agree with them. I try to understand yours, believe me - I read everything you post.

    I would like to continue to post (or submit posts at least) on your blog. I will go out of my way to ensure I keep away from any hostile tone -It is NOT my desire to offend you or make you fearful of what I say.

    It's up to you Wendy.

    Evan.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Dear Evan, you are most welcome to come and comment as much as you want. I might be a sadist when it comes to self defense techniques against testicles of an attacker but I do not like to hurt feelings of an innocent man. I think the content (and also future content of this blog) is disturbing for you. I feel sorry what happened in that bar and it apparently affects you a lot. I do not support anything goes approach and I clearly stated it in my absolutely first post. I also support men when they need to defend from women so there is not much we can argue about. Wendy

      Delete
    2. Well, I can say her sharp high heel cost my leg 17 stiches, and she had no idea how truly fortunate she was to escape that encounter in the condition that she did...

      Women have a right to bodily autonomy just like men do, and to defend themselves when attacked - INCLUDING attacking the testicles of a male attacker. All men (me included) are well-aware of the sensitivity and vulnerability of their testicles - this is a simple matter of fact.

      What I find somewhat disconcerting is the reference you make here to not supporting an 'anything goes' response does not appear beyond that one section of your blog, and that you prefer to stay away from discussing what an appropriate response in certain situations might be. Obviously - and I freely admit it, as a man some of the techniques you discuss are very unsettling - I am sure this would be apparent and expected by a woman who has a blog such as this. Most men do not relish the thought of being castrated or having their testicles ruptured. I also think some of your sarcasm comes across as almost taunting to at least the male readers; I presume that is intentional.

      You can say whatever you want of course, and perhaps since your intended audience is not men, how those words are perceived by men may matter not at all. I do think that your blog would attract far less anger from men if you considered addressing these points in your posts, but it is up to you of course.

      Women should not be assaulted, period, and have the right to defend themselves -effectively. I think you would be even more effective with your intended audience if your posts gave due consideration to some of these suggestions, but again, you're free to say what you like Wendy.

      Delete
    3. I would not be honest if I did not admit that at times I believe that men would be a good deal better off if they just ignored women completely and built lives for themselves with other interests. Sex isn't that important in the scheme of things. Women could do the same amongst their gender. No more assaults-you would have achieved your goal Wendy.

      Delete
    4. Dear Evan, don't be so bitter. I see you have had some bad experience with women in the past and you cant get over it. Two genders are different in many aspects but have to complement each other. It is not only about sex. Yes there are clashes sometimes, but that's normal. That's why I do not like you visit this blog. It does not do any good for you. You should meet and have discussions with the type of women that suits you not those who would antagonize with you. Don't worry most women are not sadistic or wicked bitches as maybe you think. Take care. Wendy

      Delete
    5. I believe you stated that on at least one occasion a man attempted to assault you. Would it not be fair to say that this blog could be construed as being inspired by those events, and that one may also accuse you of being bitter and 'not getting over it'? That doesn't mean those assaults were ok-they were not, I am just pointing out that experiences affect and influence people in different ways, as our experiences have for each of us.

      If you haven't drawn this conclusion already, I keep to myself in life (I don't date, at all).

      Delete
    6. Surely the attack affected me but is not the only reason for this blog. That's why I do also understand your bitterness. Being single is a legitimate personal choice, and its not my business but maybe you should reconsider. You are an intelligent and sensitive guy who needs a well fitting soulmate. But you wont find one on this blog for sure. Just forget the gender wars for a while. Once I met a very nice Canadian exchange student :) It cant be that difficult. Wendy

      Delete
    7. I cannot imagine what it would be like to be attacked as some woman are by some men. In NO way do I make light of or trivialize the horror of those experiences, and how they can shape a woman's view of men...

      Delete
    8. Well, I can say without reservation that this would be the last place I would look if I was interested in meeting a woman; I'm confident that I speak for most men when I say this....

      Delete
    9. Don't be so confident :)

      Delete
    10. At least for men that value keeping their testicles, which I decidedly do, as do most other men...

      Delete
    11. Here's a slightly tongue in cheek posting you can put on your blog, representing a hypothetical match-making effort to seek men for your eligible female readers...

      'Seeking young, reasonably fit, attractive single men to date young, attractive women. Must be very supportive of the woman's interest in self-defense, and willing to potentially sacrifice your testicles to support her training. Ice will be provided to you at no charge, when requested. The woman accepts no responsibility for any injury to or permanent loss of your testicles, and may end her relationship with you with no notice if you lose your ability to procreate due to losing your testicles. Interested males may apply online.'

      Delete
    12. But Evan, keeping your testicles that's a great idea, but you should share the joy of having them (and their products) with a woman and not selfishly keep them just for yourself. My boyfriend's testicles simply belong to both of us. LOL

      Delete
    13. Thanks for the ad! I guess there are many eager applicants out there. LOL

      Delete
    14. Darn, I forgot to add one thing - Here's the marketing hook you can use as the headliner... 'Attention all eligible young guys! Do you have the balls (for now) to date one of our strong, independent female blog readers?'

      :-)

      Delete
    15. Nothing wrong with a woman 'enjoying' a male lovers testicles - as long as the manner she 'enjoys' them in is safe for the man...

      Delete
    16. And... yet one more thing for the ad: 'Male applicants must enjoy scrambled eggs - especially when it's their own eggs getting scrambled...'

      Delete
    17. You see Evan, you can have some good humor. You are not that bitter now. I love scrambled eggs and poached eggs as well! But you Evan should look for a woman who would protect those two eggs of yours like a bird his own eggs!

      Delete
    18. Sorry, but I am committed to a life of celibacy and self-reflection, so women of this and other self-defense blogs will have to look for some other guy's eggs to scramble....

      - Evan

      Delete
  29. It would be helpful if you would please explain what that one fundamental thing is, and give me the opportunity to respond.

    Perhaps there is further opportunity for dialogue between us Wendy.

    ReplyDelete
  30. 'Having a male assistant with good vibes makes a female self defense class an enjoyable experience.'

    Don't you really mean to have said: 'Having gullible male assistants that are easily manipulated and willing to suffer severe pain makes a female self defense class an enjoyable experience.' ????

    ReplyDelete
  31. Are we going to acknowledge that Linda is a sexual predator based on this story? She sexually assaulted both of the guys.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. No, this is the training of female self-defense, and it naturally involves strikes to the testicles. It was demonstrated to us and we practice it. Like it or not. Don't worry those guys are not from sugar. They are not going to cry they got assaulted during self defense training. They knew what they signed for. Their testicles are OK. Regards, Wendy

      Delete
    2. I admit that I was hasty in my judgement. This was the first thing I read on your blog and the way you made it sound seemed like they were not aware of what they were getting into. I still think the slap to the balls was unneccessary, but sexual assault is not the right term.

      Delete
    3. Hi, I understand your concerns, to be honest, I have not always fully agreed with Linda's 'unconventional' approach and maybe she went overboard sometimes, but she is a professional and she knows her stuff. When she wanted to show us how the element of surprise is important and working she simply demonstrated it for real, well sometimes at Bob's and Peter's expense. That groin slap was mild it was not intended to cause him great pain, just to make a point. They both signed up to be assistants for a self defense class so yea one should expect some hits to the testicles. They did not make a drama out of it either. Wendy

      Delete
    4. Can you give examples of times you haven't agreed with Linda's approach or when she went overboard?

      Delete
    5. Hi, there were a couple of such occasions. Once she ordered full force sparing with boys, without any protection. This was to learn the application of a knee in different situations. It happened I took the training maybe too seriously and kneed Bob in his unprotected testicles really hard. Poor boy. I got a bit angry at her for how she behaved toward him afterward as he could not continue the assignment. I will write a post about it. Wendy

      Delete
    6. was Bob naked during the sparing

      Delete
    7. In this particular case not. He wore only some thin gym shorts, which was like he was naked. I could really feel his poor soft testicles with my knee. Wendy

      Delete
  32. Since this story involved one man being exposed in front of the girls and the other taking a legit, unprotected strike to the testicles, how often did that happen? Like, were they nude often? Did they actually get hit often? Was it not embarrassing for them to have their genitals exposed without any of the women (I'm assuming) being nude or topless?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hi, thanks for the question. Sure these situations were a bit embarrassing for Bob and Peter, especially at the beginning, they were cutely shy and blushing like hell. But I think they got used to it over time. It might sound too surrealistic, odd, and unfair to them but actually, there was no way around it, female self defense simply involves different strikes to the testicles and we were taught this and we practiced it. We got prepared well for some serious situations such as a rape attempt, even with an attacker exposed. So yeah them pulling down their shorts, happened fairly often. You know as young liberal college students we are used to seeing (and touching) each other genitals. It was not such a drama as some critics on this blog envisage.
      But don't get me wrong they were not naked all the time. We trained also other techniques and for situations, we are encountering a clothed attacker. They had to take some even strong testicle-hits almost every class. Linda insisted that all of us, we were 6 students, should have a chance to spar with a boy when learning a particular technique. So you can imagine them being totally exhausted at the end of the day :) They often left the dojo limping. Bob and Peter were not learning self defense against women, so no they had no official chance to see our tits :) I say official because we were not so cruel we showed them once in locker rooms as a reward for their service, but Linda did not know. Regards, Wendy

      Delete
    2. I'm sure they both appreciated seeing breasts. How far into the course was that? I ask because, at least in my experience, interactions are slightly different when one party has seen and touched the other's naked body but not the other way around. And you girls definitely got the chance to see and touch the boys' naked bodies.

      Thank you for the blog. The dynamics between the men and women in this situation are really interesting.

      Delete
    3. Hi, thanks for your question. I was more later in the course when we get used to each other and formed let's say a bond and somehow got a strong feeling it is not fair for the boys. You know it was their duty to serve as model attackers with everything it takes. It also means when they played out an attack they played it realistically, sometimes grabbing our tits and buts as a perk. But then in return, they got what they deserved for such audacity or their poor testicles :) Regards, Wendy

      Delete
    4. You mentioned that Linda didn't know. Do you think she would have been upset about it? Also, when their attacks involved touching your breasts or butt, was there extra discussion beforehand? Like some warning for and permission from the girl?

      Delete
    5. Hi, yes we rather did not tell Linda, she would not be happy. Everybody had a role in the course. Bob and Peter were model attackers and we were learning self defense, never the other way around. She would not be happy if it turns into some naked show. Peter and Bob just had a chance to grab our tits and butts as part of their role. Linda insisted on the realism of the training and explained to us at the beginning it is an essential part of the game. As I said it was not a piece of cake for either party. Both guys were fit cute students so it helped a bit. However, all of us could leave at any time, some almost did, but luckily it has never happened. Regards, Wendy

      Delete
    6. Back to my question about them taking hits to the testicles, if you don't mind. What was the hardest they were hit unprotected on purpose? What was the hardest accidental hit (like someone thought they had a cup or something like that)?

      Thank you for your input.

      Delete
    7. Hi Jay, as I wrote elsewhere, for instance, there was a very dramatic situation when I was sparing with Bob without any protection, this was to get the most true-to-reality scenario (Linda simply insisted) and I kneed him in the testicles. He was out of business for the rest of the class despite Linda insisting on continuation. I think it requires a separate post. Wendy

      Delete
    8. I look forward to that post.

      Delete
    9. The date of your post was seven months ago. When do you intend to post a story about what you say above here?

      Delete
  33. Do you know what size all your instructors tits were, or just Linda's?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hi, well yes I could estimate the size of the breasts of my instructors. But one has to measure first to be sure :) Wendy

      Delete