It is always nice to have a chat with your friend even if it is about a self defense course |
Susanne,
why did you take the course?
I come from a small town where we basically know each other.
Personal safety has never been an issue for me until I came here to study at
the university. Suddenly, I appeared in a whole new environment, often
welcoming, sometimes quite hostile and dangerous. The city is large with many quarters
rather not to go. The university student life included wild parties, meeting new
friends and of course receiving a lot of attention from all sorts of guys.
I love swimming, so I regularly visited the university
health club with a large pool. One day, late evening, it was about the closing
time I was dressing up in the locker room after shower. I thought I was alone
there. Suddenly, out of nowhere a young man accosted me. He must have sneaked
in the women’s section unnoticed through a back door. He was strong, much
taller than me and mean looking. He was naked with just a towel wrapped around
his waist. I was petrified and I had no clue how to react. He pushed me against
a wall, started to kiss me and forced his hand between my legs. Suddenly, I
could hear some voices; two janitors were coming in. He cursed, let me go and
ran out through the emergency exit door. I was in such a shock that I was trembling,
and I could hear my heart beating. For several nights I had difficulties to
sleep. All the time the bad throughs what could have happened if he was not
disturbed were going through my head. I realized I must take some action to be
able to handle such situations, so I enrolled the course.
Did you
worry about the ‘special’ nature of the course?
I knew that the course is far from ordinary beforehand. We
heard some compelling stories from the past attendees! We discussed the safety issues in our
class group during a break. I know that some of the girls were reluctant to
take such a course and called it a creepy nonsense and a total waste of time. “Touching
and kicking some guy’s naked balls?!, no way!” was the response of one of my
classmates. But I was not hesitating
even the slightest moment. Wendy, I
think you would also agree that at the end it went so well, and we even had
some fun and we really learned something.
What did
you like the most?
It was clear from the beginning that Linda put a lot
of thoughts to the structure and the content of the course which was so diverse
and interesting. During the course I realized that female self defense does not
have to be taught as a death serious dark subject but could be fun and a good
physical work out as well. It all started with very informative lectures, then
we always had some warmup exercises and games at the beginning. Linda was also telling us many inspirational success stories. And of course, as the other girls I really enjoyed
having Bob and Peter around. Such brave and dedicated lads. They are handsome and
fit as well, aren’t they?
Was there
something you did not like?
Susanne is a very dedicated and attentive young orthopedist. She used hers medical skills during the course |
Have you been surprised by something?
The Linda’s unconventional approach in teaching female self
defense and some content of the course was indeed full of surprises. I had four
semesters of human anatomy, but I could still learn some completely new things
about the body mechanics and some interesting details about the male body and its
vital points. Luckily, we had Bob and Peter around, so Linda could teach these
subjects in a very practical and fun way. Surprisingly, we also learned a lot
about male psychology and how to utilize this knowledge for self defense. Who
would ever think all of this is a part of female self defense course, right?
Many
commenters on my blog criticized how we and Linda treated Bob and Peter. What
do you think about that?
To some extent I understand the rage of your readers and I must
admit that indeed sometimes Linda was not very nice to them. But too nice
attitude defies the effectiveness of a training. She used her approach to break
our squeamishness and to build our confidence and empowerment. I came to a conclusion how important is to train with a man and with the highest
realism possible. Yes, you have to kick the testicles to see you did it correctly
and it really has an effect. Yes, you have to practice grabbing a real set of
balls to be ready to do it quickly and correctly in a critical situation. As you cannot learn medicine just by reading
books and watching TV series, you cannot effectively learn self defense by sparring
with a padded, hardly moving attacker. If you use an injection, it causes pain,
but it also delivers the medication. We all tried to compensate their sacrifice
with our attentiveness and affection. Despite that, there were moments I
thought they are not coming back for the next class, but to our relieve they came
back again and again. I admire their great dedication to help us with our
cause.
Some
readers also do not like the brutality of some techniques and are afraid of
misuse. Would you agree?
Well, the ability to defend sometimes comes with brutality. The rape is a horrible crime which calls for
an appropriate response. If a female victim would help to rupture the attacker’s
testes or to gouge his eyes out, then she should do it, it is fully acceptable.
It should therefore be also expected and normal to teach these techniques. I am convinced that any of the girl attendees
would not ever think to use these techniques as a mean to punish their boyfriends
or during a verbal argument. I learned which drug could kill a patient
when overdosed, does it mean I am going to use this knowledge to kill people?
What about
the re-enactment of your attack? Was it helpful?
To make the re-enactment of the attack as real as possible, Peter wore only a groin protector and a towel |
What would be your final words to the readers of my blog?
I understand that some things are difficult to read and
digest, especially for men, but I would tell them not to come to some false
quick conclusions. They should think out of the box. My cousin attended an
expensive week-long course. The only thing she learned was to yell fire and
that groin kicks do not work. I am not saying that I am now an invincible warrior,
but I have learned, tried out, and seen the outcome of some devastating
techniques of self defense for real and I know I can use them when needed. Women
should take their safety into their hands and attend a high-quality course as we
did. This is the way to go to put an end to all the rapes and sex attacks.
Thank you
so much Susanne for this interview!
'I understand that some things are difficult to read and digest, especially for men, but I would tell them not to come to some false quick conclusions. They should think out of the box.' LOL. 'You have to kick the testicles to see you did it correctly and it really has an effect.' Yup, of course you do - who could believe the mountain of evidence publicly available to anyone with an internet connection confirming the obvious. I'm sure it's satisfying for women to have been able to cause pain like this to Peter and Bob. 'We all tried to compensate their sacrifice with our attentiveness and affection.' Yup again, I have no doubt that receiving 'attention' and 'affection' from the woman that just kicked you in the testicles compensates them for what they just experienced...
ReplyDeleteWow....
How else could we compensate for their sacrifice? At the end of the day they also got paid.
DeleteYou always default to the 'they got paid' excuse, as if that in and of itself justifies whatever actually went on during your training. It is much more likely that many of the other women had the same unsettling interest you had in experiencing close up the pain/agony Bob and Peter felt after being kicked in the testicles. By feigning genuine concern for them, it allowed them to have a ring-side seat an enjoy seeing the effects their kicks had on those two young men. As Susanne allegedly said, 'you you have to kick the testicles to see you did it correctly and it really has an effect.' Sitting beside them, watching them experience pain would confirm that the desired 'effect' was achieved, wouldn't it?
DeleteYour psychoanalysis is always spot on Dr. Freud. LOL
DeleteWhy don't you have a go at a rationale argument for a change? Read the words you posted about the interview with Susanne. You stated yourself that you were 'curious' about the pain that one of them was experiencing while you were sitting beside them, and asked them about it... You're telling me that none of the other females did that as well????
DeleteWendy, a guy I know asks if you would let him wound you with his 9mm handgun during a training session, so he can determine if it really has an effect. After all, just like kicking a man in the testicles, there is NO other way to determine if the person suffers any effect at all from this, correct? Empirical evidence is ALWAYS required...
DeleteLook there is no rational argument or rebuttal for a psychoanalysis. Maybe lets say yes some girls indeed sat next to the boys in pain and were curious the same way as me. But 'enjoying' would be a little bit far fetch expression. Empathy and care were strongly involved as well.
DeleteTo your brave pal with a gun. I supposed he owns a gun but he has never fired a one. I suppose he does not need an empirical evidence that if you pull the trigger it will fire. There are many evidences already it works so he can save some ammunition and time. Now I see, Canadian government save nation defense expenses and ask now the military personnel just to watch Netflix series to learn military skills. You can clearly see and learn from it how it all works. It is a very progressive and evidence-based approach. LOL.
Delete'To overcome my bad sentiments, she made me the chief paramedic of the course. She even taught me how to check the testicles for any signs of internal trauma and how provide the so called testicular first aid.' Unless Linda was a urologist, it's highly unlikely - to put it mildly, that she was qualified to teach a medical student trained in orthopedics how to 'check to internal trauma to the testicles'. You need to brush up on who medical degree programs are structured if you think otherwise. Somehow, one might reasonably conclude that having the same woman who takes a course in self-defense that she knows involves kicking a man in his testicles be the person that also checks those being kicked for injuries to that part of their anatomy may be construed as a conflict of interest... hardly what could be called independent health check/medical advice, was it???
ReplyDeleteCome on, what are you 'construing' again. Injuries are part of many trainings and trainers also provide trainees the first aid. So she was not supposed to help in order not to be construed as conflict of interest? That's your brilliant deduction?
DeleteYou miss the point - as you so often do. Since the person playing urologist and performing the so-called testicular health checks is also the person that kicked the guy - or in the same group of others that also did the kicking, they obviously had an interest in having your two 'training dummies' stay there and be on the receiving end of further attacks. Since I presume you didn't also have a medical facility and team right there, recommending that Bob or Peter should get professional (i.e. real) medical attention would result in their departure, and that would have a negative impact on your classes. Aren't you able (or unwilling) to understand this?
DeleteJust to confirm the obvious for you, as your post above is misleading - Bob and Peter were NOT trainees, were they? Also, 99.99% of training does not involved naked men being kicked in the testicles...I am sure that you would love this to happen regularly, but that's your sadistic nature shining through...
DeleteWell yes, we did not want any disruption of the course time plan so yeah it was much more practical to do the checks by Susanne. Come on, she is a skilled medic. And the boys also appreciated to have it done by someone they know and is caring for them and not in some anonymous cold medical facility.
DeleteSkilled 'medic' what's that? Paramedics aren't qualified to diagnose those types of injuries, nor are physiotherapists. Nothing like the pseudo- attacker evaluating the injuries the victim incurred...no issue there.
Delete'Some anonymous medical facility' - like a hospital with real, qualified medical personnel and equipment? Like that?
Yup, concerns about their health were certainly in the top ten items on Linda's list, to be sure.
I have no idea what country this took place in, but if in fact Bob and Peter were seriously injured, I wonder what the university would have to say about this class once they found out what actually went on in it. If either guy needed real medical treatment (you know, the kind hospitals provide, not the type Susanne and others provided) It is hard to believe your course would not run into liability problems. What rationale volunteer would sign a waiver absolving the instructor of all responsibility if they were injured? They would be out of their minds to consider doing so. Once they are being paid, there's a legal relationship in place, and they would very likely have certain protections under law.
DeleteWhen Linda seems to hold the views she does towards men, any man even contemplating getting involved in a course like this really needs to have his head examined. Young guys lack life experience, and can more easily (and were, it seems) be manipulated and lied to.
What I know Linda had to defend the course at the higher level of management. But I do not know the particularities, I can ask her at the interview. Also about the legal issues and the contract. You know here in Europe the 'law industry' does not determine our behavior and lives that much as across the Atlantic, meaning we do not go to court for anything.
DeleteThe USA is not that free country as it likes to be perceived by others.
I lived there for a short period of time, I know. Canada might be slightly different.
We are more liberal here in Europe and our society is more based on mutual verbal agreements. So maybe there even wasn't any contract at all.
Look, not every man is the same. Peter and Bob participated in our course, it was their will. They are adults. Respect their decision. If you think you would not be able to do fine. Nobody is forcing you to do so. Or do you think Linda will come to Canada and bring you in chains just you can serve as a 'kicking dummy' in her classes :)
Looks like it's time to change your filters again Wendy- numerous responses to your posts are not making it through...such as the response to your comment above...
DeleteLook Evan, you and your pals are nice guys but I wont approve anymore comments from you. I tried to be empathetic but you crossed the borders. I do not want to be offensive so I wont write anything more. Show your moral qualities at least for once (you value these so much, don't you), realize you are unwanted here, do not embarrass yourself anymore and bravely leave my blog. Thank you, Wendy
Delete'Then his completely unprotected bare testicles would be the perfect target for several precise knee strikes. When he collapses, I can use his 'blindness' and confusion to stomp well between his splayed legs with the ball of my foot to finish the job.'
ReplyDeleteI'm curious Wendy- what exactly does' finish the job' mean? I MUST adopt the same approach next time a woman decides to assault me. I am going to 'finish the job' as well, believe me. She will meet her maker.
'Finish the job' means to make your attacker no threat to you anymore. You can of course take the approach in self defense you think is the best and which fits your believes. And please Evan we already discussed all the issues. Your pals are already gone.
DeleteOh I see, so your position is that all the 'issues' have been discussed, therefore you are correct in everything you say, and are no longer willing to post anything but glowing supportive comments from your female readers, is that it?
DeleteYou have also refused to post several comments that were -by any reasonable standard inoffensive - even by your definition. For example, on what basis is it that Susanne can reasonably claim that no woman would ever use the techniques she learned to punish a boyfriend or during a verbal argument? That is simply her opinion, nothing more. Since it is obvious that discussing when it is appropriate to use any certain technique was not high on Linda's list of training objectives, it seems quite reasonable to conclude that she simply left that decision to the students.
Come on, look I approve basically everything. But your 'standard for inoffensive' is apparently far from mine. Sorry, but I wont approve comments offensive not only to me but also to Linda, course attendees and my blog supporters. Repetitiveness and spamming with the same comment content is also a no go.
DeleteI do not know, if you buy a knife do you always get a bunch of legal documents saying you should not stab your spouse in a verbal argument? If I see you buying a knife, do you think my first thought would be oh my gosh he is going to kill me? And this is the problem. We discussed this many times and I explained myself already on this issue but you continue to perpetuate the same idea/qualms If you see a killer, a castrator or a sadist in everybody, that's your problem.
You approve only relatively innocuous comments, and avoid any that take on/rebut your position head on. You defend most everything that took place in your course on the basis that it had a 'purpose'. Many of your views are very unsettling, and suggest an underlying, simmering hatred towards men. You certainly had no problem with anything done to Bob or Peter - by you, any of the other students, or Linda. Is there any female behaviour towards men that you actually think is unjustified, or wrong?
DeleteEven some of the things such as Linda calling Bob and Peter 'training dummies' and slapping one of them in the testicles during some game that in the context had nothing to do with self-defense techniques you had no problem with at all. The truth of the matter is that those two guys were manipulated and abused during that course, but since that served a 'purpose' - and that is the justification always, it was acceptable. Over and over this theme percolates through this blog.
Anyone capable of critical thinking and objective analysis could identify the intense dislike/hostility towards men that is close to the surface of your words in this blog. I doubt there is any actions a woman could take towards a man that you would not defend.
You would be maybe surprised that my love towards men is maybe higher than yours towards women. Yes I love men and I support their rights. Simply our view is different on what purpose and gains balance the negatives. Do you support young men of your country going to wars and being killed in the battles? If yes, is it because you hate them? I think it is rather your misogyny which is 'close to the surface of your words' in your comments.
DeleteYou 'love' men do you? I thin you 'love' the idea of being sadistic in actions you would take towards them - this blog is evidence of it. You support men's rights? really? What was that post of yours again - you support men's right to be kicked in the testicles, wasn't it? Yup, you support men's rights, for sue you do..
DeleteYour 'view' is certainly different, largely because the 'gains' were experienced by the female students, while the vast majority of the negatives were definitely incurred by the two men. To you, if there is a 'purpose' -as defined by you, then the negatives (incurred by others -men in this case) are always justified.
Your other claims about men going to wars is idiotic, and has no relationship whatsoever to what is at issue here.
As to your last missive, it has no basis in reality. I don't like YOU, there's no reason at all that I would impose that view by default on half the world's population, and I don't.
it is right that men make themselves available for exercise
ReplyDeleteman101
Hi man101, thanks for you support. More men should be like Bob and Peter.
DeleteWendy, do you think that if Linda is ever asked to put on other courses like the one you attended, she would have the honor and decency to be completely honest and transparent about what exactly the male 'training assistants' (i.e. training dummies) could expect to experience?
ReplyDeleteSeems like a reasonable question, doesn't it? I know that women value honesty, and want to lead by example, after all....
Thank you for this question. I actually do not know what kind of discussion she had with Bob and Peter prior the course. Maybe they were informed. I will make an interview with her so I can ask her about this. It would be interesting to know. Sometimes to be too honest and transparent is also not good. This world is not black and white. Wendy
DeleteDon't worry Wendy, there's zero chance that you will ever convert to honesty, and you should remind yourself of this post of yours regarding Linda not being 'too honest' with respect to informing Bob and Peter about what they would actually experience in the course. It conflicts with your idiotic later claims that they were fully informed. Obviously they were not. Linda used her position, the signed contract and waiver, along with the volunteer credits as leverage to subject them to whatever she wished. No doubt this is how you think all female self -defense instructors should treat their male 'training assistants '...
DeleteThe only reason Linda would not be transparent (and honest) is that being truthful and disclosing what would actually be involved would have had a significant negative impact on the number of males that were willing to participate. You don't support being 'too honest and transparent' for that reason. The world is not black and white? Really? Gee, I had no idea, but that has nothing whatsoever to do with the ethical obligation she had -whether she accepted it or not, to be truthful about what those volunteers -later temporary workers would actually experience. It says a lot about your own values and how you view men that you have no problem with the deceptiveness around what should and should not be disclosed.
ReplyDeleteAfter all, you're not 'too honest' with your boyfriend, are you?
I don't know how much honest are other job advertisements. Have you ever read a job advertisement saying you would have to work overtimes, having an incompetent and stupid boss and no increase in years. Don't tell me such a jobs do not exist and were advertised honestly. I said many times I do not know what Linda said to them or convinced them. At that time for me it wasn't a controversial issue or something to investigate. You want to live in an utopic world please wake up, you seems to be old enough to realize such a world does not exist. No I am not 100% honest with my boyfriend, probably you are also not with your spouse or girlfriend. The only difference is that I admit it and do not make moral judgments over other people. And for 100 time I do not hate men!
DeleteYou didn't win many debates in high school, did you? Your default rationale and justification for many of your claims is based simply on the fact that a similar action occurs elsewhere. Your comment about job advertisements above is but one of dozens of examples. The absence of presence of something alone doesn't legitimize it. The fact that there are misleading job ads in no way supports you pal Linda being misleading in the information provided about the so-called 'training assistant' role.
DeleteYou go on to claim that I am 'probably' not 100% honest with my spouse or girlfriend. This assertion is based on what exactly? It's baseless - in part because I don't have either, by choice.
Finally, your last claim that you do not make 'moral judgements' 'over' other people is garbage. Look up what a moral judgement is. Your posts on this blog are ripe with them...
I apologize for the mistakes in English. For such a long comment, I preferred to use Google Translate.
ReplyDeleteI served as a professional soldier in the army of the Czech Republic for 19 years. During the service, of course, we also learned to fight without a weapon. For many years, I also used my skill to help as a helper in a school for self-defense for women. Personally, I am a gentleman and I treat women all my life with respect and esteem. And I also met men who didn't behave like that. There can't always be a gentleman nearby to stand up for women. Women must be able to defend themselves. I am proud to be able to serve and help women defend themselves effectively.
I don't understand the constant attacks on the slightest trifle from anonymous commenters
Peter
Dear Petr, thank you so much for your support.
DeleteI really appreciate it.
Don't worry about your English. I am a nonnative speaker as well and I often do horrendous mistakes. Important is we understand each other.
Thank you so much for helping in female self defense classes.
What is disturbing some of the negative commenters claim they are ex-military men. I imagine good and brave military men as you, gentleman, supportive of us women who want to learn self defense. Keep up the great work! Have a nice day Petr, Wendy.
Don't be discouraged. Your articles are very interesting and provide a completely different perspective on some of the many years of repeated "truth". Some myths of female self-defense have been repeated for many years. They need to be refuted and the truth told out loud.
ReplyDeleteI'm glad you found the courage to start this job
Petr
Dear Petr, thanks for your encouragement. I will continue this blog despite all the negative responses. I already had a post about some myths in female self defense but I will make some more where I will go more into the details, with a more elaborate discussion about each of the myths. Wendy
DeleteHello Wendy,
ReplyDeleteOne that blog page where you discuss how the parts of a woman's body can be effectively used in self-defense, I see that most of them seem to involve either rupturing the testicles or another very similar outcome. There is another blog where a woman suggests using your sharp fingernails to catch on to and then tear through a man's scrotum, and then literally grab onto and rip his testicles from his body. What do think about this technique? I am sure it would stop the attacker in his tracks, and maybe even kill him, don't you agree? If so, why don't you include this technique in your blog?
Thanks.
Hello, thank you for this interesting question. Yes, this is a legit technique, but to me it should not be preferred. For several reasons: firstly, you must have sharp long nails, then puncturing the skin (even a soft and fragile scrotal skin) is not that easy and you can just break your nails. This technique will always cause massive bleeding, which is a serious infection hazard. Techniques involving bleeding should generally be avoided. This technique can indeed kill your attacker. Well many called me a sadist on this blog but I believe this should not be the aim or the preferred outcome. There are many other effective testicle-targeting techniques which do not require much strength and are not lethal. Causing unconsciousness is enough to get to safety. I will describe many other techniques on this blog so stay tuned! Best Wishes Wendy
DeleteIm really curious how the susanne story ended.
ReplyDeleteHow much power (50%) did she use on the cupless secuence? Did she follow the secuence to the ball of foot stomp or she stopped on the middle?
Hi andré sorry for not responding earlier. As I remember they tried also once without a cup, but this was rather to get the realism as much as possible, and I don't think it was even 50% of force, possibly much less. We learned how to adjust the power and to slow down at the end to the level not to cause harm. Otherwise, it would be quite dangerous for Peter. In full force, it could result in testicular rupture. Susanne did the final stomp as we learned to do it properly, with the heel of the foot, at a 45-degree angle to compress testicles between the heel and pubic bone. Wendy
DeleteThanks for answering. I imagined on that position would be ideal to kick from below the testicles with the ball of the foot. Did she grab the ankles to create that proper angle for a heel stomp?
DeleteAlso incredible the level of trust the guy had on susanne to expose himself to that sequence. was that a sequence personalized for sussane or you learned it too?
Hi andré, that's a good suggestion. However, it depends on the position and distance. If she stands right above the man it is better to stomp sharply downwards to crush the testicles. At some distance from the attacker, it is better to kick with the ball of the foot in a more scooping action as you suggested. The foot can gain the required momentum. She did not grab the ankles in this case. This would be feasible (and recommended) if she got on her feet from the ground so she can take those with her and effectively open up the target. In Susanne's case, she was already standing and the fall made Peter open his legs enough. She was able to finish the sequence quickly without any additional movement. Yes, we could also practice this sequence, it is very effective. Wendy
Delete