Saturday 20 November 2021

Interview with Linda (part 2)

In the first part we already learned about Linda’s occupation, how she got into self defense and about her interesting research. In this instalment we will discuss male volunteers, how she found Bob and Peter and get them involved. I also hope she will satisfactorily rebut some of the concerns about their treatment during the course.

Linda maybe we can now talk about the course you lead. How long have you been teaching the course?

This year it is already the fifth season.

You mentioned that you received some backlash from the management. What happened?

The new dean gave the Linda's course a green light
When I was setting up the course, I knew that my style of the teaching will not be everyone’s cup of tea, but to be honest I was not expecting such a resistance. Apparently, there have been some anonymous reports—I don’t know from who—to the departmental management that I promote violence and I ‘misuse’ the male volunteers. I was told that I must ‘readjust the curriculum to follow the university moral codex and protect the dignity of all participants immediately.’ 

However, the atmosphere changed with the election of our new dean. One of her goals is to cope with epidemics of sexual misconduct and to increase safety on campuses. I had a brief meeting with her, and she told me she alone was a victim during her studies. She supported me in everything I do, and said to me, I do not care if it is offensive or what your methods are, if it works, teach it! Linda, I need you to teach those girls proper self defense. If I had more time I would love to join and learn how to properly kick balls. The allocated budget is also quite generous so I could buy some new equipment and give some small cash to Bob and Peter, so they have another reason to stay. It would be a pity to lose them.

I remember all the rumors about your unconventional approach. Some of us girls were afraid to participate, one of my classmates called me crazy because I did. Do you know you even got a nickname?

Not really, what is it?

‘Cruelinda’

(We both laughed). Well, I do not force anybody. Those not afraid to join my course—usually 5 to 8 students—are very committed and motivated and even thou maybe having some initial doubts and qualms, they soon realize why I do things the way I do. My mission is to teach self defense to young women properly, not to be politically correct.

Let’s talk a little bit about our two ‘darling attackers’, Bob and Peter. Have you had any volunteers before?

Yes, the course volunteers are usually the same I use for my research. Because Mike and Felix decided to leave due to that accident, I had to find new ones. I was very lucky I got Bob and Peter.

So how did you find them?

Linda recruits male volunteers 
among university students
They are our master students at the department. I was looking for the replacement of the two lost volunteers to be able to continue with my research and the course. At first, I thought I will make an advertising poster and stick it in a hallway, but one of my colleagues came to me that she already has two good candidates. She told me both were too focused on their training and forgot to take some theoretical courses and now they are missing some ECTS credits and whether participation in the experiments and the course can earn them some. So, I invited them to an interview to my office.

How did the interview go? How did you convince them?

Both were quite shy from the beginning. I think I explained them in all honesty what the goals and methods of my research are and what the course is about. I stressed that the training is very realistic, as will be their role as model attackers. I told them that I am looking for someone comfortable to get naked in front of the girls and not being afraid of direct physical contact. This also means they should expect some trashing and pain, including the testicular pain. This cannot be completely avoided when teaching female self defense. I told them this is just a small price to pay if they are dedicated to make their female fellows safe. I promised them that I will arrange those ECTS points and such a volunteering activity will look good on their CVs.

How did they react?

They gazed at me in surprise first, then at themselves, but finally nodded in agreement. I guess they really needed those ECTS points. But then I said All right, show me your true commitment and drop your pants! You should have seen they surprised faces. Peter asked, You mean like right now? I insisted, Yes, I am serious, I need to see your genitals.Reluctantly, with a blushing face, but they did. This wasn’t just to test their true commitment—they passed—I also wanted to see if they are suitable for the purpose of the particular research objectives and to be able to demonstrate variability in one of the most important targets. As you could also notice, they have a bit different testicles and penises.

Are you satisfied with them?

So far yes. I was glad we are going to have assistants in the same age group as the female participants. Statistics are clear, most university-aged women will be attacked by an attacker of their age, often classmates or dates. It does not only add to the realism of the training, but it also helps in bonding. Surely it can get quite intimate sometimes. Their athletic body type and stamina is also a plus. One of my philosophies is that girls should always go through that important empowering step of taking down a man regardless of their height, size or muscle mass. I always ensure this experience happens for every girl during the course.

How would you react to those accusations that you did not treat them well?

Linda arranged sperm count for
Bob and Peter to rebut any concerns 
Those boys are not from sugar. Both do sports on a semi-professional level. This means they must obey an authority and submit to a strict discipline. They train and workout daily, so they are used not to be treated with kids gloves. Last but not least, they were informed and agreed to help with the class with all it takes. Importantly, they also signed a waiver. When there was a problem I or Susanne took a good care of them. By the way she would be a perfect andrologist as well. She could be very empathetic with guys and also gentle with her hands. I admit that occasionally they left the dojo limping, with some bruises and they might have had to skip sex from time to time, but I am sure they have not sustained any permanent injury. However, once they earned those ECTS points to keep them for the next round I remunerate them with some pocket money. So technically they are not volunteering anymore. 

There has been a heated discussion in the comments, whether they got ‘harmed’ or not.

I always try to find a good balance between the realism and effectiveness of the training and the risk of permanent injury of our dear assistants. You can confirm that in some instances, when a serious injury would be imminent, I insisted they wore a cup and a head protector. However, full force, ‘no punches pulled’ sparing is an integral part of my teaching and accidents cannot be completely avoided. So yes, from time to time we had to deal with bruises, black eyes, limps, and a swollen scrotum. Luckily, neither of those have required any medical assistance.

Nevertheless, some of you, especially Laura and Susanne were concerned about long-term effect on their reproductive health. To comfort them, I arranged a sperm count check at a fertility clinic where one of my friends works as a clinician. I also saw some anti-doping screening results so I can reassure everybody that their sperm count and the level of testosterone is perfectly normal for boys of their age. Their role was to play attackers so one can expect they got beaten and be harmed in the same way as one can expect they fall from a bike from time to time getting some nasty bruises. I am pretty sure if they did MMA they would be at higher risk of serious injury. 

Doing any kind of sport puts a male at
risk of testicular injury
This is what I would say to all my critics. If you have serious concerns about men’s ‘testicular health and safety’, advocate for mandatory cups not only in MMA fights but also in other sports such as soccer. Occasionally we do a mixed match between our female and the male soccer team, and I could never understand that strange carelessness when it comes to wearing cups. It is so tiring to deal all the time with a male player writhing on the playground in horrible pain. And it is also so heart-wrenching to see those young men anxiously protecting their genitals when making a wall during the free kicks. So who is a sadist here me or the coaches of the male team?

To be continued...

72 comments:

  1. 'Importantly, they also signed a waiver.'

    LOL, No surprise here. Nothing like being able to protect your own interests and legal liability if one of the training dummies - sorry, darling attackers, who were compensated handsomely with 'pocket money' was to be seriously and/or permanently injured. There's a certain comfort knowing that no matter what, you won't have to face the music in a legal proceeding.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. It is a normal practice to sign such a waiver. You should know better Evan, you come from a 'Nord Amerikan' country where you have to 'protect own interests and legal liability' all the time.

      Delete
    2. Hmmm.what happened to your earlier claim that you never use the legal system in Bananaland, but everyone just happily agrees with one another?

      It must have been like she won the lottery, being able to design the course as she pleased be protected from legal liability, so she could do anything to those two guys without fear of any consequences. What a banana republic ypu live in indeed!

      Delete
    3. We do use a legal system in our Bananaland but do not solely rely on it. Inter-personal relationships, trust and honor all of this makes a good well-organized society. We do not brandish weapons for every slight problem or quarrel like you are used to. Linda designed and organized the course for benefits of the female participants and to mitigate inevitable effects on of the male volunteers. It was her right to do it this way. The end of discussion Evan, period. You can organize your course the way you like.

      Delete
    4. 'Inter-personal relationships, trust and honor all of this makes a good well-organized society...'

      Oh, I see now. Please, for your viewing audience, could you please clarify for us which of those three values/traits you evoked when you were performing that fake testicular cancer check on your boyfriend - remember, the man you claim to love? I am sure your readers look to you for leadership in these areas, to be sure.

      We anxiously await your response...

      Delete
    5. 'To comfort them, I arranged a sperm count check at a fertility clinic where one of my friends works as a clinician. I also saw some anti-doping screening results so I can reassure everybody that their sperm count and the level of testosterone is perfectly normal for boys of their age.'

      This just reeks of unethical practice and privacy breeches. How is it that Linda would have access to this information- did she just call her friend and ask here for the results? Further, how could it be that Linda had access to the results of anti-doping screening results?

      You're inferring that all this very personal medical information was not only disclosed to Linda, but also shared with the female students? Is there anything your two training dummies were allowed to keep private? What a bitch Linda is!!!

      Delete
    6. Really? Please explain the type of honor and trust Linda displayed during the course.

      Kindly use in your explanations the time where she put chili on one of the guy's penis, slapped one of them in the testicles, and then pulled the shorts down on one of them, exposing his genitals to the students. I assume these are special applications and interpretations of trust and honor, unique to Linda... We await your insights...

      Delete
  2. 'I am pretty sure if they did MMA they would be at higher risk of serious injury.'

    What an idiotic comment this is. I am pretty sure if they did MMA they would be paid a good deal more than 'pocket money', be able to defend themselves against their opponents, a referee would be there to actually monitor the fight, plus real medical assistance was immediately available right on site, not some medical school dropout (Linda) or an orthopedic student (Susanne) that is hardly trained in or experienced with the types of injuries Bob and Peter would/could suffer.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Despite all of this injuries (including some serious testicular) happen, so what. Should we ban it all?

      Delete
    2. Yes, and the 'injuries happen' only to males, which makes them for you, Linda, the female Dean, and all the female students a good deal easier to accept, doesn't it? After all, if Bob or Peter of any of the other trained dummies suffered permanent injury, they could not seek compensation, nor could Linda or the university I presume be sued. Linda, you, the Dean, will all think nothing of it. The simmering man-hating qualities tend to manifest themselves eventually, no matter what, don't they Wendy?

      Delete
    3. Lets talk about your misogyny for a change, Evan.

      Delete
    4. I don't host a blog that spews hate towards ond gender, unlike you do, stupid. It's simply breathtaking how much you contradict yourself in a pathetic effort to justify your or Linda's position. The fact that you don't approve so many submitted posts almost says more about you than the lame and evasive responses to posts you do allow. Overall, you just suck as a decent human being, because you're not one.

      Delete
    5. Look Evan, you somehow self-impose moral superiority and self-righteousness, it is obvious you hate me, Linda, Susanne, the course, the Dean and I think you hate all women which are not lenient. All you care about is my relationship with my boyfriend and the testicular safety of Bob and Peter.
      I have an advice to you, open your own blog and discuss whatever you want (it is free and it takes only a few minutes). You can than post whatever comments you want or rather not, please show an example and approve all of them also those vulgar and spamming. I have been quite patient with you and I do care about you. I do not like when you write stupid comments very early in the morning when you are supposed to sleep (or to do other useful things).
      Maybe I am a sharp-tongue sadist but I always try to be decent in our communication and not to personally attack anybody. If you write a comment with a content, I approve it and respond. But this blog is not a forum for manifestation of your anger and hatred. Either you will behave or I will stop any discussion with you at all. Wendy

      Delete
    6. Lots to unpack here; where should I start?...-:).

      First of all, while I don't 'hate' you as such, I would not disagree with the claim that I dislike you a great deal indeed... I DO agree that you're a smart-tongued sadist - that is salient, and I can't say I am fond of your pal Linda either. Your statement that 'I hate all women which are not lenient' makes little sense without providing context, which you don't. You have made the comment on several previous occasions that you either like me and/or care about me. Neither of those opinions make much sense whatsoever, given my sole interaction with you is through this hateful blog.

      Your many posts allow anyone with decent critical-thinking skills to form an opinion of you - your values, beliefs, etc. To restate the obvious, you control 100% of which submitted posts you approve so they appear here, and which you not. Since we BOTH know which posts of mine you do not approve, but obviously none of your readers do, it is not a big intellectual leap to say that your claim of vulgarity, spamming, etc., etc. is one that is rarely subject to public view, since you censure so many posts. This is simply a matter of fact.

      I saw a post of yours on another page today, in response to a post from a man. In that post, you go on to claim that you are not promoting violence against men. Doubtless we will debate semantics here, but tell me if you think promoting a certain deception undertaken by a female on her boyfriend, under the guise of a testicular cancer-check, but with the real objective of locating his epididymis and pinching it to confirm the obvious (that is is a VERY sensitive area, and is VERY painful if pinched, etc.) could be construed as promoting violence by women towards men?

      Evan

      Delete
    7. Evan, Evan, lets cut it short. You submit vulgar and hateful comments, whether readers see it or now does not change the fact. I can like or dislike people I have never talk to in person or even I have not seen them. Look up what the word 'violence' means. Neither of the definitions you find on internet is apt to describe a slight pinch on the sensitive area of a man. Wendy

      Delete
    8. Each time you comment on that event with your boyfriend, you further minimize it, as if it was nothing at all. Typical of your numerous biases and how you justify everything you do.

      Your assertion that all comments you disallow are either spam or vulgar isn't very compelling since your determination of what those posts are isn't subject to public scrutiny, since no one but you sees them.

      Delete
    9. 'You submit vulgar and hateful comments, whether readers see it or now does not change the fact.'

      Whether posts I have submitted that you have not approved (there have been MANY) are vulgar or hateful depends on the perception of the individual, JUST as you continue to claim you don't hate men. Since nobody capable of objective thought will see those deleted posts, you're free to crow all you want - it matters not. You parrot a claim that cannot be considered by others since they will never have the opportunity...

      Delete
    10. Yes Evan, perception of an individual is important. Things can be very subjective. The same logic can be applied to your own subjective perception of my alleged 'man hatred'.

      Delete
  3. 'She supported me in everything I do, and said to me, “I do not care if it is offensive or what your methods are, if it works, teach it! Linda, I need you to teach those girls proper self defense. If I had more time I would love to join and learn how to properly kick balls.'

    Well now, what a surprise. The new female Dean was more than supportive of Linda's course, and in her own words, did not care how offense or what Linda's methods were. Sounds like a woman with the same values as you Wendy- more than happy to sacrifice any male for the benefit of females.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Sure, as a female and a past victim the Dean understood better the importance of such a course, regardless of the methods. You are interested more in wellbeing of Bob and Peter, she is more interested in safety of female students. There is always a bias from both sides.

      Delete
  4. 'I told them this is just a small price to pay if they are dedicated to make their female fellows safe.'

    There is a certain and notable comfort when the price being paid for anything is paid by someone else. It's hardly rocket science to conclude that Linda's self-interest (with the backing of the female Dean) made it easy to conclude that anything the training dummies would experience was a 'small price to pay'...

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Everybody has to sacrifice something in order to achieve a goal. And Linda was not an exception, she had to deal with those anonymous reports for instance.

      Delete
    2. I think it's more like Linda was happy to sacrifice a man's health for her own benefit and that of the female students to reach her goal.. Somehow, its more comforting for many who wish to reach goals that primarily rely on the sacrifices made by others..

      Makes the 'sacrifice' she made just a little easier to endure, don't you think?

      Delete
    3. Poor Linda.. She had to deal with complaints from people that actually had the temerity to disagree with what how she ran her course. Poor thing. But, a new female dean arrived in the nick of time to save her the inconvenience of having to justify or explain what she did and how she treated males. So fortunate for her. After all, she should be able to do anything she wants to males - at least she and the female dean think so (and obviously you of course)..

      Delete
  5. 'By the way she would be a perfect andrologist as well.'

    LOL. Of course, Susanne's orthopedic education provided her with the perfect background to be a specialist in male health. I know a few orthopaedic surgeons of long experience who would never, ever make this claim. Good try, but yet another false claim....

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. No Evan you got it wrong again. She would be a great andrologist because she could be very attentive and empathetic to male patients. These are very important qualities for such a sensitive and touchy specialization. The theoretical knowledge of it can be always learned and gained during practice but these personal characteristics need to be born with.

      Delete
    2. What the field of andrology definitely does not need is any sadists in it. So, to avoid medical malpractice lawsuits, and possible incarceration, do yourself and society a favor and don't leave your office job for a change in occupations... You wouldn't pass the empathy test anyway!

      Delete
    3. Don't worry Evan, I, Susanne, or Linda wont be your andrologist. You can sleep well. :)

      Delete
  6. LOL. I can tell you from personal experience that soldiers wounded on the battlefield much prefer to be treated by a competent medic that can deal with the medical aspects of their injuries rather than someone who simply says the equivalent of 'thers, there, I know if hurts but I'll hold your hand and you'll get better'...

    Susanne was also a student who like you and others caused your training dummies serious pain, why the hell would they or should they trust her and think that she would actually give them any aid at all???

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Causing pain on one occasion does not exclude easing pain on the other. Trust is important Evan.

      Delete
  7. The capacity to be empathetic is certainly an important quality for medical professionals, as it is for most everyone else on the planet. However, it is also useful to possess the required qualifications. Andrologists are always urologists first, which in turn requires an undergraduate degree plus graduating from medical school, which typically is a four year program. Then, add a five year residency on top of that. Your claim that the 'theoretical knowledge' can 'always be learned hold true ONLY if the individual does as is described above... You can't become a medical professional of any sort by using Google...

    Linda claims that if 'there was a problem' either she or Susanne 'took care of them'. Linda dropped out of medical school and Susanne worked in a private orthopaedic clinic, which suggest to me she was a physiotherapist of similar, and certainly not a M.D. Even so, neither had the education or qualifications to assess the types of genital injuries you and your students inflicted on the training dummies, sorry, darling attackers.

    Last comments - empathy and being attentive are learned traits, you are not born being empathetic or attentive by default, and it's ridiculous to suggest you are.

    I also find it ridiculous that if Bob or Peter at any time suffered a swollen scrotum from one of your many techniques they had to suffer through, based on what I have said above, neither Linda nor Susanne were qualified to determine if proper medical attention should have been sought. Linda claims that 'none (of the injuries sustained, including a swollen scrotum) required medical attention'. It's more than a stretch to believe that she felt any genuine concern for either of them when these injuries were sustained, and out of self-interest alone managed to convince them that they did not need to see a medical professional. Of course, knowing that they signed a waiver against taking action against the various individuals, etc. likely made her decision a little easier to make, didn't it?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I do not know how to react to your conjectures Evan. You don't need to be an urologist with 20 years of experience to asses if a testicular injury is mild, treatable without a medical assistance or not. This is not a brain surgery. I also think Susanne would be a great andrologist. I read once an interview with a female andrologist (it is relatively rare but there are a few!) it was a very interesting reading.

      Delete
  8. 'And it is also so heart-wrenching to see those young men anxiously protecting their genitals when making a wall during the free kicks.'

    LOL. Looks as if Linda took a page from your book Wendy, and is trying to rebrand herself as someone who actually cares about the well-being of males... Good try, no trophy though...

    ReplyDelete
  9. 'Luckily, neither of those have required any medical assistance.'

    Here you have it folks- a conclusive and trustworthy diagnosis from a medical school drop out, with occasional assistance from a physiotherapist.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. OK, next time, if the dean agrees, Linda can hire a full time professor of traumatology from some prestigious university for the course just to put your mind at ease Evan :)

      Delete
    2. LOL. You're certainly a smart-mouthed little fishwife, aren't you Wendy..in addition to being a liar and man-hater..:-)

      Delete
    3. Evan, maybe you should read from time to time your comments to find out who is actually a smart-mouthed fishwife on this blog.

      Delete
  10. Smart, yes..fishwife..ah..not possible by definition...-:)

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. OK, you are right 'smart-ass' fits much better for you.

      Delete
  11. Nice read!
    I am amazed of how Linda really digging deep into this subject, I feel like there are so much hidden information regarding male vulnerability and their testicles, I think Linda is on the right way to make this subject as a science, which I believe it should, Also, it will be a huge step if Linda could work on making that course a mandatory class, that way she could make sure that there will be male assistant without the need for volunteers.
    And regarding the volunteers, kudo to them, they are very brave and smart, they should know that we women really appreciate that. It is very important to let them know that their actions could save life and we should even encourage more men to understand that women's safety is a big issue around the world, and even though you might feel some pain when you get hit in the testicles, the purpose is way more important, and as Linda mentioned, men get hit in the testicles almost in all sports, so why don't you make it for a good purpose.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thank you for your comment. You are absolutely right, Linda is at the top of her field and it would be great if these courses are mandatory. However, she would need to train teachers first as she would not manage everything on her own. We should be really grateful to Bob and Peter and all volunteers for they help in improving our safety, they support a good cause. In the next instalment of the interview we will learn more about Linda's philosophy and key principles in teaching female self defense. It will be a very interesting read. Best Wishes. Wendy

      Delete
  12. '....And even though you might feel some pain when you get hit in the testicles, the purpose is way more important..'

    Of course, as is consistent with the theme of this blog and the female posters, when the benefit is received by one group (women) at the expense of another (men), it is always easy for the group benefiting to justify the cost incurred by the group paying. Hardly a surprise...

    ReplyDelete
  13. Capitalism -at least at times provides for a value exchange -one party gives up something they value (money) in exchange for the receiving goods and/or services that they-at least in theory, find are worth the monetary cost (at least initially). What you promote and defend here can hardly be evaluated using the same principles.

    ReplyDelete
  14. Boo!

    It's the man you love to hate most, wishing you (in all seriousness) a very, very merry Christmas and a Happy New Year! I commit to NOT submitting ANY new posts at all until January 1st, 2022, to give you a well-earned reprieve from my submissions...

    All the best to you and yours Wendy! I DO admire and respect the passion and commitment you've made to women's self-defense (yes, really).

    P.S. Please don't tell anyone I said this - it might compromise my reputation on your blog... :-)

    Happy Christmas Wendy!!

    - Evan

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Dear Evan, you just surprised me with this comment. You can be very nice (sometimes:). In turn I do admire your persistence in fighting for men's rights. Enjoy your well-deserved white snowy holiday (I guess you never miss that in Canada, don't you? :). See you (or rather read you) in January :). The woman you hate you the most wishes you a very Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year 2022! Don't worry your reputation on this blog is absolutely unshakeable :) Best wishes, Wendy

      Delete
  15. I agree with Linda's point regarding mandatory groin cups in sports, if men are really concerned about the safety of their balls they should wear cups instead of whining every time they get hit in the balls. or to be specific I think it should be the opposite, I think in martial art sports, cups should not be allowed, because the goal here is to beat the opponent physically, where other sports like soccer, tennis, basketball...., cups should be mandatory, because the winning is decided by goals and points and skills.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thank you for your comment. You made a good point. Guys are very sensitive when it comes to their little vulnerability but when they actually can do something about it they become totally negligent. Then, instead of being that invincible machos they end up on the ground whining pathetically. When it comes to martial arts, in ancient Greece basically everything was allowed. If you fight you fight to subdue your opponent. Not only testicles can be seriously injured during a match so why to specifically protect these? Quite provocative thoughts :) Wendy

      Delete
    2. These are men's sports and we set whatever rules we find suitable, no one asked for your advice, you should stick to your sports like ballet and you could talk about the rules you want.

      Delete
    3. No need to be upset. Of course set any rules you want. But when it comes to testicles it is not solely men's issue. It concerns the reproduction of human race, so we should be allowed to take part in this discussion :)

      Delete
    4. I have 3 points that I need to explain here:
      first, as Wendy said, when it comes to testicles, we absolutely have the right to talk about them and discuss their issue because balls are important to reproduce the human race, also we have boyfriends and brothers and we care about their wellbeing.
      Second, all sports are promoted toward both men and women, we all watch sports, and from sport's fan view when a player get hit in the testicles that slow the game down, fans pay to watch players compete, fans are not paying to watch players rolling on the floor grabbing their balls and crying from the lightest hit in the balls!
      Finally, from self defense point of view, I think that is a great example of how vulnerable testicles are, it shows that even the top of the world athletes that have been working-out their entire life, a little hit to their testicles would brig them down in a lot of pain.This really emphasize that testicles should be the first target in self defense.

      Sarah

      Delete
    5. Dear Sarah, thanks a lot for your comment and these 3 important points, I absolutely agree with you, I could not write it better. I think I will cover these points as separate posts in the future. Have a nice day. Wendy

      Delete
    6. it would be great. Thanks Wendy

      Delete
  16. Would you be able to do a recorded interview with Linda?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks for this suggestion, but unfortunately I cannot do it. At least not for now. I already face backlash from the commenters on this blog for writing about the Linda's self defense course. I have to keep her privacy and she is already quite busy with other things. Finally, as you maybe noticed, we both are non-native English speakers. I did the interview in our language and then I translate the pieces. But never say never. So maybe in the future, we will see. Have a nice day, Wendy

      Delete
  17. "And it is also so heart-wrenching to see those young men anxiously protecting their genitals when making a wall during the free kicks"

    I always find it interesting how soccer players all act tough and macho but as soon as they try to make a wall they turn into a cute boys and their only concern is to protect their testicles!!
    Also I find it a great example to debunk the myth that says "testicles don't hurt that much", well, if they don't hurt that much why don't soccer players cover their faces?! at least by one hand!!
    that just shows to the whole world how vulnerable testicles are. especially as we know that soccer is the most popular sport in the world.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Good point! You are right, that would be a good counter argument for those who all the time perpetuate the myth that the testicles are not that sensitive and not such a good target for self defense. Well sometimes I feel those top professional soccer players do not have anything in their head so that's why they do not bother to protect it :) I believe their testicles are much more useful for them so they rather anxiously protect those:) Thanks for your comment. Wendy

      Delete
  18. why did Linda make them drop their pants?! what is the point of doing that in her office?
    that is so ridiculous

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hi, I understand it all sounds ridiculous, and I am sorry if this upsets you but Bob and Peter got hired (at first they volunteered) to play attackers for our self defense course with all it takes, which also involved Linda teaching us techniques applicable to exposed attackers e.g. during a rape attempt. So Linda wanted to probe those two guys first if they are truly ready to take on this important duty. She also wanted to check their genitals whether suitable for the intended purpose. Don't worry they already dropped their pants in front of a woman before :) There is nothing to be ashamed of, they are both well developed. So again maybe it sounds weird and too 'unconventional' but that's how things should (but almost never) be done. Wendy

      Delete
    2. It seems rather unlikely they would have ‘dropped their pants’ in front of a woman who is a university instructor in her office at her request before that, doesn’t it stupid?

      Delete
    3. Why do you think so? They are not that shy, and Linda can be quite persuasive and authoritarian. I guess it came as a surprise at first and sounded like a weird request but they took the opportunity to show off as typical cocky lads (but honestly their male equipment is not that exceptional :) Wendy

      Delete
  19. What's this accident that caused the 2 other volunteers to leave? Nobody lost a nut or anything, right?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hi, you can read about it in part 1 of the interview. Luckily there was no permanent damage just a severe contusion in Mike's testicle. However, it still required a short hospitalization. There was still a real risk of losing that testicle so quite a scary situation. So understandably it raised some concerns about Linda's research and her self defense classes. I think it is good it continues. Wendy

      Delete
    2. I appreciate the response. I agree that Linda does important work. I do hope that she became more careful afterwards. Any serious injury may be unavoidable, but they should still be avoided.

      Delete
    3. Sorry, that last sentence was clunky. I mean that I accept the danger is part of it, but it should be minimized when possible.

      Delete
    4. Hi Jay, thank you. Clearly, if she wants to continue her research and the course she can't mass produce eunuch ;) Sorry, it was just an attempt at dark humor. The purpose of her research is not the testicular injuries of her assistants, so she is surely more careful. Regards, Wendy

      Delete
    5. Thank you for your response. I like dark humor, even if that doesn't come across in my comments. I'm glad that she is more careful with the balls at her disposal.

      Delete
  20. YOU said: 'Last but not least, they were informed and agreed to help with the class with all it takes.' Is that a fact? What exactly did 'informed' mean, let alone 'all it takes' ? You have already on more than one occasion stated that Linda DID NOT describe in any detail exactly what they would experience during the course, and it is obvious that they were NOT provided with any independent resource prior to signing that waiver to clearly understand what they were risking. That clearly suggests that she was intentionally deceptive in her communications with Bob and Peter - you have acknowledged this yourself in your own posts. Small wonder your universities rate so poorly when they hire faculty with the ethics that Linda displayed...

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. They were informed they will help with comprehensive realistic self defense classes for college female students, not a garden party. What should they have expected? They are adults and they signed the waiver. And no Linda did not provide them with a detailed 'script' of each of the classes. Wendy

      Delete