Wednesday 9 December 2020

To crack two nuts

We immediately knew we are going to have some fun when Linda brought to our class a bag of walnuts. She gave each of us one and asked us to crack it using only our hands. We all tried hard, putting it in different positions, using different parts of our hands and even using both hands, neither of us managed to do so. Then she gave us second nut. “Try again now”, she said. We all got the idea. By confining both nuts in our palms and by pressing them together one or both cracked relatively easily.

Linda then continued her lesson: “The method I am going to teach you today is called the nutcracker because it uses the same principle. It can be applied when your attacker has a relatively small scrotum and when the GTP technique is not well applicable. Such a situation might for instance arise when he is still clothed but you have the possibility to slip your hand in his underwear. In this case the movement of your hand would be limited, and the pull part is risky or not possible at all as you would not have enough room for executing that. Like GTP, this is another very serious anti-rape technique and is intended to incapacitate your attacker to the point he passes out.”

Now she was pointing to her favorite detailed medical diagram of male reproductive system hanging on the wall: “Human testicles are like these walnuts. Testes are covered by a tough fibrous outer layer called tunica albuginea which protects the inside in a similar way as the walnut shell. The soft tissue of our hands cushions the hardiness of our bones, that is why you were not able to open a single walnut, but with both in a grip you could utilize the stiffness of the shells by pressing against each other”.

She then demonstrated the technique on two walnuts in a sock. “As always, at first you must establish a good secure grip by locking your forefinger and thumb around the top of the scrotum sack (A). Enclose both testicles with your palm and fingers and squeeze with all your might so the two testes are compressed against each other (B). The scrotal skin and the connective tissue are quite thin, so it does not act as an efficient cushion. Normally, you can initiate the move with one hand and to use the other for protection against any possible blows or even better you can use it to attack his eyes applying a single-handed eye gouge. As we discussed before for a man it is extremely difficult to counter two attacks aimed at two of his vital points at the same time. 

In case you have your other hand free use it to wrap it around the first one and squeeze both simultaneously to double the pressure (C). If you feel they cannot be compressed anymore, start to forcefully grind them against each other by pushing the base of your thumb against the opposite movement of your fingers. This should cause the tunica albuginea to tear, and the seminiferous tubules to get extruded”. She then did exactly what she was describing on the scrotum analogue and in no time we all could hear a cracking sound from the sock.

She added: “I know, it all sounds gross but don’t be squeamish, always follow through with full force and determination. It is a highly effective technique to eliminate you attacker. Testicular rupture generates shear unbearable pain and neurogenic shock so at this point he should be unconscious. However, always follow the 10 second rule. Maintain the hold and squeeze at least for 10 seconds from the point he passes out to be sure he is no threat to you anymore. At this point you can consider yourself free” She then took the cracked walnuts out from the sock and ate the kernel with a great satisfaction. We did the same with our nutty reward. While we were snacking, she asked us with some smirk on her face. “You already got quite familiar with Peter’s and Bob’s genitals so who has the most susceptible balls for this technique?” 

“Peter?!”, hastily but with some shyness in her voice replied Laura. I could see she suddenly blushed. We all giggled and looked towards the boys siting aside on a bench still recovering from the previous session. Peter cutely cringed and somehow instinctively crossed his legs. Linda continued: “You are right Laura. He has much smaller testicles than Bob, but still of a normal size for a healthy 19-year-old lad. If he was your attacker, you should be able to contain his whole scrotum in your girly hand”. Linda then raised her open hand in the air so we all could see and added: “Well, my hand is much larger than Laura’s so I could make a number on Bob’s testicles as well". We laughed again and now we looked at Bob who just lost all his pride to be better endowed than Peter.

Linda suddenly clapped her hands loudly, “OK girls, before using the actual living things, grab the model testicles or the rest of nuts and practice the move, I would like to see you all fully understand the principle and you are proficient in it enough before we enact some sex attack scenarios with the boys…”

107 comments:

  1. Another excellent article, Wendy. Once they're trapped, you actually only need to rub them together quite gently to get a serious reaction. So, it's a technique you can practice on a willing partner and become proficient with - with less risk of harm than, say, kicking. Great fun as well!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I can only imagine the long list of "willing partners" that would eagerly await having a woman do such a thing to their body -as if practicing kicking a "partner" in the testicles is acceptable- at least not to the vast majority of half the world's population.

      Delete
    2. Thank you so much for your comment. Yes only a gentle rubbing of testes can cause a quite dramatic reaction of a man. Bob could tell a story... :) I am thinking to convince my boyfriend I need to brush up my self defense skills.. :)

      Delete
    3. How do you know. Most men are concerned about their female partners safety and I would guess many of them would like to support their self defense training by offering their testicles... Bob and Peter have got some balls to do it for us. Well maybe you don't.. But that's fine.

      Delete
    4. I'm curious how much the allegedly willing participants Bob and Peter got paid for dong something that could have a lifelong impact on their sexual and reproductive health. From your earlier stories about the lie you told to your boyfriend in order to locate the structures of his testicles, I'm sure you can think up another one without too much trouble...

      Delete
    5. You should have revised your assertion that they "have got some balls to do it for us", to: "they have got some balls -for now, to do it for us". After all, it's only real men that willingly allow women to kick them in the testicles. For sure, every man knows that...

      Delete
    6. To be honest I do not know, they started as volunteers. As any other students with a lot of interests, living in a city with high living costs they would be for sure happy for any decent "easy money". They got some regular health check-ups and Linda told us their sperm count and testosterone levels are in norm. Also both are sexually active. I would estimate that racing in cyclocross most likely possesses a much higher risk of permanent damage to their male reproductive functions than our self defense course.

      Delete
    7. So, your telling me that these two men got sperm counts and testosterone tests as part of their health checks related to the injuries they experienced in your self-defense course, and the results of these tests not only shared with Linda, but the students (you at least) were aware of the results of those tests?? And of course, you're aware that they are sexually active. Were they required to divulge that information as well as a condition of employment? What about their PSA test results or other blood work? Certainly that should be shared with the all-powerful Linda. What banana republic do you live in anyway?

      If you're kicking a naked man in the testicles with the intention of learning how hard you need to kick him, squeeze him, etc. to incapacitate him, then there's certainly a genuine risk of serious injury. Not that this would be a major concern for someone like you.

      Delete
    8. You tend to make a huge drama out of nothing. Linda asked them to take these tests as a part of their regular check-ups to have counter arguments exactly against these female-self-defense-training-assistants rights activists as you. They normally have a lot of check-ups, they are students of physical education and do sports semi-professionally.
      There is nothing shameful to learn that two healthy young men have normal sperm count and testosterone level. They were not ashamed to tell Linda, neither she to us. Also why should it be a "medical secret" that these two young men have girlfriends. Maybe you live in a more puritan country, so these things sounds strange to you. I would rather live in my banana country.

      Yes, indeed there is a genuine risk of serious injury, as well as during gymnastics or boxing. Should we ban all of these to be on safe side?

      Delete
    9. Oh I see now, your hero Linda asked these two late teen/ early 20's young men to see a physician to get blood work done for testosterone levels, plus get a sperm count test. And the rationale for her doing this was of course to 'counter' any naysayers that may read some blog or other pro-live practice on male genital self-defense website in the future?? Really? By the way, any physician with an actual medical degree would certainly question why a man of that age wanted such tests. Perhaps they just informed their physicians that they were being paid to get their testicles squeezed, pulled/kicked/etc. I'm sure that information wouldn't be of interest to the physician, not all at... Professional athletes - and I've known one or two over the years certainly don't get those types of tests as part of any regular health check-up.

      I do question why Linda felt compelled to share the results of such tests with the female students - rather personal, don't you think? You didn't say earlier that they had girlfriends - only that they were both sexually active. The latter may be presumptive, but it isn't really anyone's business, is it? I recall a post by you when asked about your sexual interests, and your response was quite indignant -that they were nobody's business, so how is it any of the students-or Linda's business whether your two self-defense "assistants" level of sexual activity was?

      Delete
    10. OMG, your interest in wellbeing of two healthy young men who gave full consent to serve as self defense training assistants is really touching. Instead of being happy they do not have any health issues, they earned some cash and we learned self defense in a proper way while having some fun you are nitpicking over details of some health checks and the scandalous public exposure of a top secret information that these two healthy young men have regular sex with their girlfriends. I do not know the details about how they took those health tests, the testosterone levels are regularly measured during anti-doping tests this might have not been a part of a regular health check. I do not know from which country are you from but in most European countries there is a universal health care and some tests you can simply take for free if you think you might need it or as a preventive action. I think they would not be the first and only young men in this world willing to test themselves on fertility issues. Again, sorry I do not know the details, I will soon have an interview with Linda and I can ask her about it.
      BTW, she wanted to know and they willingly told her about their sexual life They didn't have to. Should she or them be now ashamed?

      Maybe it will comfort you but you are not the first naysayer. I guess I will have more information after the interview.

      Delete
    11. Most men in their late teens/early 20's don't get themselves tested for "fertility issues" unless there is a compelling reason to get it done. Getting kicked in the groin as part of being an "assistant" in a women's self-defense class might do it, but it's hardly common as part of a general health check-up, in any country. You're grasping to defend your assertions, as is common.

      Delete
    12. So, it is more important how the sperm count was done or that they do not have any health issues related to their reproductive system?
      They were not harmed during our classes, period.
      BTW, if Linda did not tell us about their sexual life, we would anyway find out. You think, these things can be kept as an unbreakable secret in a female student community? :)

      Delete
    13. You miss the main premise of my post, as you often do. As I stated, IF those two young guys chose to get those tests at her 'suggestion'- now why I wonder would she have made that suggestion?, AND provided her with the results of the lab work, it isn't her right to share that information with others unless she has asked and been given permission. You struggle with assigning any rights to the other gender at all, don't you?

      Your ability or interest in finding out about the sex lives of these two young men is immaterial to the matter at hand. It's about their right to privacy -if they so choose to retain it. And all along women have presented themselves as being so righteous and honorable, when now I hear they are chatting to all their girlfriends, etc. about who they are screwing.

      To correct you yet again, they were not permanently harmed during your self-defense classes.., Or your claim about using ice regularly related to putting it in drinks...

      Delete
    14. Of course we were also afraid we might harm them. So this information was relevant for us as well. We are not that monstrous as you think. And we were like a sport team, team members we are entitled to some information about other team members. Have you been so upset also in cases, for instance, when they revealed a soccer player is not joining the match because he has a sprained ankle. Should they keep it also as a medical secret?

      And BTW, welcome to this world. Seems you just landed on Earth. One revealing information for you. Girls gossip! Hope you wont change your nice opinion on us.

      We saved their testosterone and sperm production. Is it not kind and considerate enough :)

      Delete
    15. Skanks are skanks, as they say. You are obviously incapable and/or unwilling of differentiating between common knowledge of injuries such as a sprained ankle an actual teammate in a real team may suffer, and very personal information relating to an individual. Rational, objective thought has never been one of your strong points, judging from this blog.

      So good of you to not permanently injure another person (or persons) during training of this sort. Given your proclivities, it's somewhat surprising you had the required self-restraint.

      Delete
    16. I heard numerous times that and that athlete had low or high testosterone. I read once about a cyclist who got ruptured testicle and was it in the news for everybody to read. Numerous celebrities reveal their sex life and frequencies of their intercourses. We are not that uptight here in Europe when it comes to human sexual health as you guys in Nord Amerika.

      Delete
    17. You say that the instructor lady asked the boys about there sex lives. How come she ask them of this? I do not understand here.

      Delete
    18. Hi, she wanted to be sure there is no harm to the boys in playing attackers and being hit in the testicles during the course. She wanted to assure us and any other critiques. Don't worry they are not that shy and secretive about their sex life. They like to brag about their 'successes' in this area a lot as other young men. Wendy

      Delete
  2. This method of squeezing has been used as a torture technique for thousands of years. A notorious exponent was the Ugandan dictator, Idi Amin. He learnt this move as a youth and he ruptured scores of men during his lifetime, mostly captives. In the nursery rhyme Mary, Mary, quite contrary (about the Tudor queen Bloody Mary) the "cockleshells" were devices that were applied to testicles and squeezed them until they ruptured.

    If you have ever seen a man with ruptured testicles you will never forget it. The agony can easily persist for several months. Linda's attitude towards it is interesting, would I be right is thinking she's actually done this to someone?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thank you so much for this historical inside. I can imagine it is a horrible experience for a man. I would only do it to a man with full force if I needed to avoid rape or murder. I am actually going to interview Linda soon, so we will find out if she has done it to someone.

      Delete
    2. I can almost sense the tension in you from anticipating a positive response from Linda to this question. Don't forget to include all the details please. Did he scream, groan, did she hold on for the mandated 10 seconds after he became unconscious? What about the eye gouge? Did she manage to blind him in just one eye or both?

      Your loyal followers can hardly wait to hear...

      Delete
    3. It's hard to believe you actually have a real boyfriend. Too bad for him that he doesn't know who you really are as a person; he'd dump you like a bad habit.

      Delete
    4. Well it seems, actually your are the only one here who is interested in these details from Linda. Weird.
      Believe or not my boyfriend loves me. We have a nice relationship. Why should he dump me? Because I learned some self defense or because I advocate for female self defense? Or that I kicked a male assistant in the testicles?

      Delete
    5. It's because you're an admitted liar who lied to someone you supposedly care about and caused harm to for your own selfish interest. Does he know he is with someone with sadistic tendencies? The real you is on this blog; I doubt he knows of its existence.

      Delete
    6. Are you again referring to that testicular cancer check?
      You seems so triggered by it. Come-on I checked his balls and at the same learned his anatomy. It was a win, win situation. But yeah, it was such a hideous thing from me to do... I guess your moral is pristine clean to judge other people..

      Delete
    7. You lied to your boyfriend, and admitted it. You 'checked his balls' as you put it under the guise of seeking to confirm if a particular technique had the desired effect. Your story around that event - that you, a woman, attended a presentation on male testicular cancer and used that to talk your boyfriend into letting you examine his testicles was complete bullshit. The entire motivation for that event was related to your self-defense interest. You're incapable of admitting the obvious.

      Delete
    8. Why don't you come completely clean with your boyfriend about your secret life online and other activities you've been involved in, and ask him what he thinks of you then?

      Delete
    9. Or perhaps you just don't have the pussy for it... :O)

      Delete
    10. I believe my pussy makes me braver than the balls of these anonymous knights of morality, guardians of the men's rights (and their testicles) and amateur Freudal psychoanalytics.

      Delete
    11. I suppose you show your girlfriend/wife everything what you do online including your smart superfluous comments on this blog. I believe secrets are good sometimes, but you can organize your relationship as you wish. Are you triggered so much about that testicular check because you fear it might happened to you as well? Do not worry, most women are not vicious as me. But I advice you, do those checks regularly and only by yourself, one never knows.. :) Sorry, I am misbehaving again, I should now expect a lot of angry comments...

      Delete
    12. NO here's a classic example of how you pivot, rather than respond to the statement/question posed. You appear to have adopted a relatively new word -'triggered' which you like to use whenever you get a response you don't like.

      It's obvious you believe secrets are good - you may not have your boyfriend if you didn't. I do agree with you (hard to believe, I know) that most women do not have your cruel nature. You aren't unique, but I doubt that you represent the vast majority of women in what you believe and promote.

      Do you believe that men should have no rights, crusader Wendy?

      Delete
    13. I'm curious as to why you seem to think you are any less anonymous than those who post here using that title? Wendy? really? You could be a Wendy, then again it's highly likely that you're not. Your posts on others sites -which are often less 'restrained' that those on this blog often have another alias; you want to remain anonymous and in the shadows on your own blog, and most everywhere else you post - that's obvious. No hypocrisy here, of course..

      Delete
    14. Wendy, some of these poster's comments really seem to trigger you. Have you thought of seeking some professional help for it? We are all really concerned for your mental health and well-being. We think you just need to develop better self-control.

      Delete
    15. Since discussing health seems to be popular of late on this blog, please remember to get your pap smears and mammograms regularly Wendy. You don't want to end up going full silicone if you don't have to...

      Delete
    16. I'll wager your boyfriend is getting a little on the side, Wendy - you know, just to kind of fill in the gaps between vanilla and real flavor.. :O)

      Delete
    17. No I think some of the commenters would need a deep psychoanalysis. I would advice them not to misuse their penises and their testicles would be fine. A woman blogging about female self defense! Of course a mental case, lock her up! I am lucky I do not live in 16th century, I would be declared a witch and burned. She said testicles! How does she dare!

      Delete
    18. """I'm curious as to why you seem to think you are any less anonymous than those who post here using that title? Wendy? ..."""
      Look I do not blame them for anonymity at all, I am anonymous as well. But the difference is I never act as a moral authority. In many instances I actually admitted wrongdoing. Last couple of days I responded to tens of their comments and now they accuse me I do not respond to their questions. They are just self-righteous little prats, who even do not bother to at least sign their intellectual creations with some fake aliases so I can distinguish who is who.

      Delete
    19. """I'll wager your boyfriend is getting a little on the side, Wendy - you know, just to kind of fill in the gaps between vanilla and real flavor.. :O)"""
      Not at all, my boyfriend tastes like a mildly salty thick cream.

      Delete
    20. Garbage. You inherently assume 'moral authority' - your own morality, by virtue of what you advocate for. Your 'responses' as you call them are highly selective, and more often than not do not actually address the issue presented to you. What you decidedly don't like is a man taking you on as to what you say and promote. Period. You actually think that women should have near to no boundaries placed upon them when it comes to self-defense. This is apparent. You make some ridiculous categorical proclamations about what a woman has a right to do - an example is regarding groping. Is it acceptable for a man to grope a woman? NO. Now that the obvious is established, one might consider the nature and details of the individual act itself in deciding what an acceptable response might be. But, according to your response to one of the posts on this EXACT question, your said that the woman has a 'right' to kick the man in the testicles. The reasons you encourage that particular response (teach him a lesson, etc., etc., etc.) are all through this blog and require no further explanation. When presented with a dissenting opinion, you default to one of the standard strategies in your response, which more often than not simply pivots from the points presented.

      One of your many contradictions is represented right here, with your comments regarding anonymity. Obviously, you are not likely to be 'Wendy L.', and it is literally impossible for anyone reading this blog to determine the veracity of your various claims. For all I know Linda is a figment of your imagination, as is Peter, Bob, and the self-defense classes which you often make reference to. In the world of the internet, truth, falsehoods, and fantasy all get mixed together; up becomes down, and the earth is flat, as everyone 'in the know' has always know for certain.

      Why it would matter to another anonymous blogger which post was made by which anonymous poster is beyond me. It should be the substance of the post you turn your mind to.

      I would be dishonest if I said that at times I would not be averse to actually emailing the real you, so we could have a legitimate, authentic, respectful discussion about some of the very real and substantive issues and concerns you raise on this blog. You are a passionate woman that feels, very, very strongly about women not being assaulted and having the right to be and feel safe, and teaching them what they may have to do if push comes to shove. I may often disagree with you, but I have no lack of clarity whatsoever as to your commitment.

      Delete
    21. And to you response you just posted about 'what you boyfriend tastes like', I would never ask you such a question Wendy. The details of your sex life are private.

      Delete
    22. """Do you believe that men should have no rights, crusader Wendy?"""
      I wanted to write that I believe in only one universal men's right to be kicked in the testicles. But than I realized you can get triggered by it, so I didn't. I am not such a monster.

      Delete
    23. You should aspire to come up with something other than trigger Wendy, it's getting a little over-used...

      Had you said that, I regret to say that I would have believed you.

      Delete
    24. You would be, however, absolutely wrong. Because, I actually also believe in men's rights, their testicles to be squeezed, pulled and kneed as well :-)

      Delete
    25. It's hard to know which persona is the real you at times Wendy, I have to say. You flip-flop back and forth so often. I think anyone reading your blog would certainly agree that you support inflicting maximum pain on men whenever the situation is justified - to you. You take great joy in this, and it's part of your psychological make-up as an individual. I do believe that you believe as you have said here, for sure. No limits, no restraint, no boundaries.

      Delete
    26. I also believe that women who assault men have the right to experience a full-force cunt-punt, followed up by a vivid demonstration of the upper-body strength that most men possess. Forcefully done, a good c-p will fracture the woman's pelvis, immediately impacting her mobility, at which time as more leisurely educational pummeling may commence :)

      Delete
    27. Just an an alternative to all this vitriol and hateful banter, have you ever considered posting something that actually sets out in clear terms what your serious beliefs are? That way, both the male posters and you can save a lot of energy and time debating what one group thinks you believe, and you don't have to bother trying to correct them?

      Troy

      Delete
    28. """It's hard to know which persona is the real you at times Wendy, I have to say. You flip-flop back and forth so often..."""

      Isn't it that we all have a little Angel and a little Devil sitting on both sides of our shoulders whispering opposing things to our ears? Most commenters here are good men, including you, and I would not harm them (you) in any way. Maybe I am not a regular woman and maybe I do have some sadistic tendencies. Fine. You male commenters are rather triggered or upset or distressed or disturbed (so many nice English synonyms :) that I do not fall in this regular box of typical lenient, gentle, decent women abstained for even using the word testicles, not speaking about using this male vulnerability for self defense. There is so much injustice in this world but you pick a unrightfully executed groin kick to school me about men's rights, morality etc. but you show little or clearly pretended interest whether a woman would be able to defend herself from a rape. You know that unrightfully executed groin kick...

      Delete
    29. Troy, that's a good idea. Finally a constructive comment. I will think about a post addressing this.

      Delete
    30. Wendy, in ALL seriousness (really, truly) you are free to discuss testicles as much and as long as you wish. Really. I DO NOT fault you IN ANY WAY for suggesting to a woman that is being assaulted for real of using the accessibility and vulnerability of a man's testicles against the attacker. Can we PLEASE agree on that, please?? What I take issue with your apparent lack of understanding of a basic principle, that the actions taken in self-defense must be appropriate in the circumstances. That is it. I agree, AGREE, that women have the right to know how to defend themselves, INCLUDING the techniques you describe here. That doesn't mean that as a man I don't cringe at the absolute horror of the pain and long term impact of those techniques, BUT that does NOT mean that I don't ever contemplate that such horrific and desperate acts would not be justified AND necessary. Can we ALSO agree on this?

      I have no idea on what basis you have concluded that I thought women were expected to submit to rape of other sexual assault and do nothing. I have NEVER thought that, ok??

      Delete
    31. I should have added that I learned something about my own anatomy because of you too :o)

      Delete
    32. Finally, you should have - had you been really attentive to the tone of all these posts been able to recognize who I am...

      Think back Wendy....

      Delete
    33. I admit that the tone of many were intentionally changed, for reasons I'm not (quite) yet ready to divulge...

      Delete
    34. """Finally, you should have - had you been really attentive to the tone of all these posts been able to recognize who I am...

      Think back Wendy...."""

      Of course you are the man wrongfully kicked in the testicles at the University.

      Delete
    35. I've meant NO ill will towards you whatsoever Wendy - NONE at all. All I am trying to do- with the greatest respect to you, is present you with other perspectives that you may wish to reflect upon. You are a passionate woman that has taken up an important issue worthy of keeping alive and part of the conversation in society regarding how men treat women. There is NO dispute about this.

      What you don't know - and could not, because I didn't tell you, is that that woman that day was more 'successful' in her actions toward me than she could have known. I suffered what you often advocate for in the most extreme sexual assaults against a women as an outcome of your most severe self-defense techniques. I will let you determine for yourself what I refer to here-it should not be difficult.

      Delete
    36. And I can personally attest to the level of pain associated with such a strike, so all your claims regarding this are 100% correct. It would have likely been even more prominent had I not had other health impacts to experience that took precedence over it.

      Delete
    37. I just have a question. Most commenters here are Canadians. Is there a reason for that? I would really appreciate the answer. You can keep your anonymity. I am just curious.

      Delete
    38. I don't know. The US and Canada are very close in many things, but their values are not the same. They have health care for all, the US has health care for some, and cares not at all for many. Europe is very different, as you know far more than me. They seem to care about everyone there.

      I think that you have touched nerves with your blog because of the much increased prominence of women's rights and the sexual abuse they have experienced at the hands of men, that has been more in the public mind since Trump was elected. The manner in which he treated women has gotten a lot of attention here, and I think that many, many men - of all age groups, have been forced (or upon personal reflection) to reconsider how they view and treat women. I am in NO WAY defending the ways of old, but simply acknowledging that looking within at oneself is arguably one of the most difficult things to do, and when one's values are threatened, it can be expected that there will be anger and pushback. Things are changing Wendy, albeit much slower than many women would like. Enthusiastic consent for sex is very much out there in the colleges and universities, and many, many men have been forced to rethink their values and beliefs at they apply to women. That is all a good thing. With regret I will say that there is going to be a need for your blog for some time yet, and my - or other men's discomfort with some of the details of the content are not justification for not talking about them. I say that with both candor and discomfort.

      Delete
    39. I wish you a peaceful and joyous Christmas season Wendy. I hope you and yours remain very well in these difficult and unprecedented times. I also hope to see a decreasing need for blogs like this, and would expect that you and many other women would relish a world where the skills you describe herein are no longer needed.

      Delete
    40. I also think- my previously voiced comments notwithstanding, is that your boyfriend is very fortunate to have a woman with such strong convictions in his life. I hope he behaves himself too - for his own sake...

      Delete
    41. I wish you a peaceful and joyous Christmas season Wendy.
      The same to you. Have a nice Christmas holidays and lets hope for better year 2021. So far he behaves... If not... Ohh no.. rather not again :)

      Delete
    42. """I don't know. The US and Canada are very close in many things,..."""
      Thank you for your post and explanation. Indeed Canada and the EU are more similar in comparison with the USA. I do regret there are these gender wars. I am a feminist but not the kind of the third or fourth wave. However, I do nothing this is the reason why 80-90% of commenters are apparently Canadians based on traffic data.

      Delete
  3. Hi Wendy. I would like to congratulate you again. It is always a pleasure to be able to read your updates. The quality of your language, the technical and precise way in which you explain yourself, and the added images, make all of this a most rewarding experience. Stimulating in every way.

    My sincere congratulations.

    As for the update: formidable. It is a maneuver that I have never experienced; but that I can testify that it would be really effective.
    I liked the idea of ​​using the other free hand to disable the attacker's response, or to attack his eyes, or even add a second attack front to his scrotum.
    In the same way, the idea of ​​sticking the fingers in, or of using the physiognomy of the gonads to attack each other, has seemed very intelligent and practical to me.
    He couldn't think of an effective method to avoid such an attack, or pain. Being completely disabled with the maneuver.
    Also, I think the penis would be useless this time as a defense. In the sense that it would not prevent the scrotum from being grasped and compressed. Being a smaller scrotum more beneficial for the defender to be able to grasp and press both gonads.

    Really, as an attacker, I would not know how to defend myself against such a quick maneuver.

    What would happen in case of a larger scrotum or gonads? Could only one of the gonads hold on? Or even attack from below with your free hand as a punch?

    Eager to continue reading you. A real pleasure.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thank you so much Vil. I try to convey the techniques I learned to the readers in a most accessible way. I also wants to provide some glimpses on our self defense classes (these were not ordinary for sure) and how we trained and practice these moves.

      Yes, once you establish a good grip, he cannot do much a you can just follow through till his complete incapacitation.

      Of course we learned what to do if his testicles are too big for this technique. I will definitely describe these other techniques later in the following posts. Have a nice day Vil.

      Delete
  4. I see that you screen all posts before they appear on your blog, and allow only those that agree with your view. You have a lot of company, since the vast majority of female-led self-defense websites and blogs do exactly that. It appears that women don't welcome dissenting views, but it give them solace to think theirs is the only one that matters it seems.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. No, I do not moderate the comments. Have a look at some of the previous posts and I had quite some disagreement with some of the commenters. And that's fine a I always welcome a constructive discussion. So far I deleted only one comment which was just offensive.

      Delete
  5. Wendy, it must have felt very empowering for you and the other female students when laughing at the jokes Linda was making at the expense of the men who apparently offered their genitals up for physical abuse by yourself and the others. It must have been good fun to grip the scrotums of these nude young men and then - following Linda's instructions, give them a good squeeze. How did you gauge the pressure you used - or did it really matter? After all, if it benefitted women, it matters not whom else was harmed, especially if they were males. Great work Wendy!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thank you for your comment. You are absolutely right. Only later I realized Linda did these joking on purpose as some form of mental empowerment which is essential part of a good female self defense training. It also helped a lot to break some ice. Having the opportunity to train on nude fit young men was both fun and rewarding but also it came with a lot of responsibility. We "got in touch" with Bob's and Peter's testicles and also got instructed by Linda how not to harm them permanently. Both are fine male specimens and it would be such a pity to remove them from the human genetic pool because of our self defense training. I will elaborate on this in some of my following posts. Have a nice day.

      Delete
    2. The tone with which you refer to men in general - and towards the two individuals that for reasons known only to themselves offer their genitals up for the self-defense and personal entertainment of women says a lot about you. "such a pity to remove them from the human genetic gene pool"?? Who exactly do you think you are? It's difficult to accept that someone like your heroine Linda would genuinely care for the well-being of these two allegedly paid "workers" beyond keeping herself out of legal trouble should one of the students cause serious/permanent injury to them. Doubtless you see yourself as some sort of amateur urologist, given your penchant for studying male sexual physiology, however I rather doubt anyone present during these training sessions would be qualified to assess the severity of harm inflicted on either of these men. There's certainly ample room to cause severe pain/agony before crossing the threshold into permanent injury, and again, I doubt anyone present would offer anything beyond ice in response to inflicting such injuries. You're a hateful individual, who seemingly has no, or very fluid boundaries as to what you find justified and justifiable towards the opposite gender.

      Further, it's ridiculous to think that having knowledge of the sensitivity of male genitalia, it would actually be necessary to actually squeeze a man's testicles together, just to confirm the obvious. The rationale you put forward is analogous to someone over here feeling the need to fire their 9mm handgun at someone, just to confirm that yes in fact, it not only hurts a great deal getting shot, but can incapacitate someone. What is a pity is that the training sessions as they were carried out were actually legal in your country.

      Delete
    3. Calm down, calm down boy. Your tone you are using towards me is also not very appropriate. I love men and and I respect good and decent men. However, I do hate rapists and I want to provide women with all the necessary information so they can effectively fight back. It is quite possible it makes some men to feel uneasy. I am sorry for that, but I wont sugar-coat anything on this blog because of it.

      In several places, I praised Bob and Peter for their bravery that they offered themselves to help us to efficiently train also the most serious techniques. They are both very nice (and cute) guys I like them a lot. I also wrote we were responsible and that even our self defense training would not justify harming them permanently in any way. So I do not know how you came to the conclusion that I am a hateful person towards the opposite gender.

      I am sorry if I offended you by the "genetic pool" comment, maybe I do use inappropriate or offensive language sometimes. But are you also triggered so much when men use such remarks towards women?

      I can assure you, Linda did care about Bob's and Pete's wellbeing, didn't you read that she paid them well :) Oh sorry, I am just misbehaving again:) Now seriously, although she is not a certified medical doctor she has some strong medical background, so she could assess what is overboard and what is not. And don't worry, for sure she can provide first aid for all sorts of injuries and on different organs if necessary. Luckily, this never happened.

      Yes, I am quite interested in male sexual physiology and not only because of self defense :)

      To your last comment: Would you like to have a surgery done by a surgeon who has never done or assisted to of this kind and was just told the procedure. Would you feel safe knowing that policemen are given guns without any training and being just told the use of it is obvious haven't you watched the movies, you know you just pull the trigger. In both instances it might somehow worked out by it would also call for some troubles.
      The same is true for a type of female self defense training relying on: just take my word for it, you don't have to try that.

      Delete
    4. You're telling me that these two men would present themselves nude to Linda, and she would examine/palpate their genitals and make a pronouncement regarding whether they had suffered any injuries, and if so, how severe? That is just so damn creepy, I have to say.

      Your response to my comments regarding the need to practice to confirm what is an obvious outcome miss the mark completely. Since it appears this needs to be spelled out for you again, someone like you who takes so much perverse pleasure in studying male anatomy will know that squeezing a man's testicles hard or rubbing them together in a grip will be very, very painful. The desire to practice doing this on a willing individual - however willing they appear to be is simply not justified. It suggest a perverse, almost vicious desire to inflict pain or at the very least, confirm what is obvious.

      Delete
    5. Well, maybe it is creepy for you. For some men it is apparently not the end of the world to have their balls checked by a nice 33-years-old female medical personnel.

      I think we are not on the same page. No, we did not squeeze Bob's and Peter's testicles out of some perverse pleasure. We trained to be confident and absolutely prepared when we need to apply these serious techniques in real life. We trained different scenarios, just that we know to address them... would I be able to grab his scrotum from this and this position... would I be able to establish a proper grip... what is going to happen if I squeeze his testicles now (little of course).. could I use it to get him off of me...etc. So it was not just about proving that squeezing testicles hurts. Proper practice makes perfect.

      Delete
    6. An earlier post of yours stated that ice was used often - for obvious reasons I presume. You assert that it's some sort of thrill for a young man who presumably just got his testicles kicked/squeezed/etc. hard enough that he felt pain, to have his genitals examined by an unqualified/unlicensed 33 year old "nice" woman. Perhaps it's the "nice" that would make that experience worthwhile, and in some way compensate these two young men for being checked by someone with no formal credentials to do so. To answer the obvious, not, it's safe to say that we are not on the same page.

      In another post, you write that Linda recommends (and I therefore presume that you heartily agree) that a woman should hold on to and keep squeezing a man's testicles for 10 seconds AFTER he is unconscious, before running away. I believe there was also a comment by either her or you about taking the opportunity to execute an eye gouge - I presume with the intent to blind him. You - and your hero Linda both show your zeal for completely unnecessary and unjustified mutilation of another person. It isn't necessary to extract yourself from the threat, which clearly has been rendered incapable of doing anything more. It is 100% for vicious retribution. I doubt there are ANY circumstances where you would recommend serious consequences against a woman for doing anything like you actively promote against men; your defense of that woman in that university incident illustrates how you see the world. Your lasts comment above - "so it was not JUST about proving that squeezing testicles hurts". But it certainly was about that in part, was it not?

      I suspect that you would relish the opportunity to apply some (or all) of the techniques you discuss on your blog in real life. I have no doubt that you would do everything you could without constraint or regret, including taking the life of the man, regardless of whether it was in fact necessary for you to consume the entire menu of your special techniques.

      Delete
    7. PIVOT: "I am sorry if I offended you by the "genetic pool" comment, maybe I do use inappropriate or offensive language sometimes. But are you also triggered so much when men use such remarks towards women?"

      Here's a classic technique of yours. To be clear, it is YOU that is making the disparaging comment here -and making it towards two young men that you allegedly "like a lot". You avoid responsibility for what you say by posing a sort of reciprocal version of that question. There is no evidence I have heard any such statements and acted on them or not, and it is irrelevant to the matter at hand. What IS known here is just what is stated above - that you were very cavalier in your comments towards the two guys you claim to have liked a lot, and supposedly praised for getting kicked, etc. in the balls to benefit your class.

      Why don't you try being responsible for what you say for a change?

      Delete
    8. Wendy quote: "I can assure you, Linda did care about Bob's and Pete's wellbeing, didn't you read that she paid them well?"

      So your definition of care extended to the two guys in your class is defined by what they are paid, that's it?

      Ok, how about 30 Euros an hour to be the 'assistant' in a men's self-defense class. In case you weren't sure, you'll be the designated recipient of multiple strikes to the trachea. Don't worry, we have band-aids, ice and soothing words for you afterwards :).

      Delete
    9. """Here's a classic technique of yours....""" Uff, well at least this time we are just arguing about my verbal argumentation technique not any physical one :) OK, I deeply regret and I would like to take back that belittling comment I made earlier about Peter's and Bob's procreation. Here, I would like to publicly apology for that. Next time I will act more professionally as one would expect for an influencer female self defense blogger. Satisfied?

      Delete
    10. """So your definition of care extended to the two guys in your class is defined by what they are paid, that's it?""" How much more care they should have received? A private lounge with certified ball masseuses? Free catering and limousine? Larger ice packs?
      They volunteered first. I think the ad had the headline, Do you have balls to help me with my female self defense classes? But I can ask Linda how exactly she found them and convinced them.

      Delete
    11. Well Wendy, it certainly seems that you prefer your blog to be almost exclusively a soapbox for you to make your various proclamations about what women should do, and how to do it when it comes to your interpretation of what appropriate self-defense is for women. Your responses here are rather idiotic. Most rational individuals would not interpret 'care' as meaning payment for services rendered. That's merely fulfilment of an employment contract/relationship, nothing more.

      It appears they volunteered for this, at least at first. That is up to them, as has been discussed to death. What I was trying to convey to you - obviously unsuccessfully, is that the nature of what they were involved in may have had significant and lifelong consequences for them. This notion that you or the other women did not 'use full force' when practicing your various techniques doesn't mean much, since you could not know if the threshold for serious/permanent injury was met when you executed your techniques. Fortunately, neither young man appears to have been permanently injured - that is in part a matter of luck. I wonder what would have happened - or may happen in the future in one of Linda's similar classes if one of them guys IS seriously injured, requires real medical care and possibly suffers permanent injuries? Does Linda send a 'get well soon' or 'my sympathies' card to the late teen's/early 20 year old, reminding them of the risks they voluntarily accepted?

      Delete
    12. Por favor dime por qué eres tan puta?

      Delete
    13. I appreciate, that you as American know Spanish so well but I am not a bitch and I like you Evan despite you have some really, really serious issues.

      Delete
    14. Hi there,
      Many of your own posts assert certain things - many of which are just your own opinions, which are fine. With that in mind, isn't whomever posted this comment (I do not speak Spanish - is that what this is?) also expressing their opinion? It is rather clear that you place a good deal more weight in your own opinions over those of anyone else...

      Delete
    15. You really need to take a look in the mirror when you say this: 'It is rather clear that you place a good deal more weight in your own opinions over those of anyone else...'

      Delete
    16. I doubt you have the personal insight or self-awareness to see the hilarity and hypocrisy in many of your own posts...

      You have a lot in common with our former President who among other things was and still is, a serial liar.

      Delete
  6. um.... why were Bob and Peter naked?
    in reality, a hypothetical aggressor is usually dressed

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Oh no, they were not naked all the time. We were not that lucky :)
      We trained different attack scenarios and they wore mainly casual clothes for the realism. Sometimes they wore just a normal training outfit, T-shirt and sweatpants. But during a sex attack a rapist is not clothed all the time. And we trained for these worst case scenarios but also date rape situations etc. This nutcracker technique is rather intended for nude testicles when an attacker exposes himself.
      Well, sometimes boys also got undressed so we can understand the mechanics of some techniques (e.g. the scoop kick) and to be able to train our precision in targeting.
      We also learned some effective techniques for situations when testicles are not yet fully exposed and I will cover that in one of my future posts.

      Delete
    2. ah, I understand :-)

      Delete
    3. Hello. My sister reads your blog and she says you almost always avoid actually answering questions or responding to things men say in response to your posts. Why is that? She said that those guys do make some valid points and criticisms, but you usually just ignore them. She works in remote areas for weeks at a time, or she would have put this message on herself.

      Thanks,
      Evelyn

      Delete
    4. Dear Evelyn, Thank you for your post. I got tens of comments last days and I did my best to answer all of them. I allowed anonymous comments and no moderation. I like to have a constructive discussion and I am not afraid if somebody disagree with me. People ask, people comment and I try to answer according my feelings and my stand. There might be a strong disagreement with some of the commenters but that's life, it does not mean I do not answer the questions or do not respond. If you have any specific question or things to discuss I happy to respond. Have a nice day. Wendy

      Delete
  7. Is there any particular reason why you don't talk about possibly stabbing him while he is unconscious after you crush his testicles? Seems to me her would deserve this as well, in addition to being possibly blinded from the eye gouge. If ever asked by the police, we could just say we were afraid for our life and out of desperation stabbed him with a pen or whatever. Don't you agree?

    ReplyDelete
  8. Hi Wendy,
    Isn't there a technique you can explain to use that we can use to just tear his balls right off rather than just crush them? Wouldn't this cause him more pain and be a better reminder for him in the future if he survives it?

    Just asking, thanks.

    ReplyDelete
  9. 'I believe secrets are good sometimes, but you can organize your relationship as you wish.'

    The more abhorrent the beliefs and behavior, the more likely one would like to keep secrets. It is really too bad that we cannot (yet) identify you and then your boyfriend, to inform him of the true nature of the woman he is involved with. We are working on it...

    Eric S.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Dear Eric, I am also working on identifying your group. I have all the abusive comments archived don't worry. You are nothing else just some bunch of cowards hiding behind anonymous comments. I explained you several times what is this blog about, you idiots are simply true idiots. I warn you stop all of your activities towards me or you will regret it. You have a chance to contact me via the form https://femaleselfdefense.sport.blog/. If you do not do it I have a legal proof you are just bulling me, with all the legal consequences.

      Delete
    2. P.S. I think your current and future girlfriends/wives will be also very interested in your activities on this blog. You know your bravery can backfire sometimes. So please find another hobby and everything will be fine.

      Delete
  10. Self defense for women
    https://braineggs.wordpress.com/2016/01/08/nutbusts-and-what-you-can-do-to-protect-yourself-from-it/

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hi, thanks for the link. It contains quite some interesting information and it largely concurs with what I have been saying on this blog. Wendy

      Delete
  11. Today I Learned A Testicle Squeeze Can Kill A Man And Now I’m Afraid To Sit Down
    https://brobible.com/culture/article/testicle-squeeze-deadly/

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hi, indeed squeezing testicles can lead to death due to a neurological shock. There are instances women killed a man by hard squeezing. I have not heard about a case of a man dying after he sat on his testicles though. Just be careful and don't feel embarrassed to adjust the package to a safe position before going to sit. Regards, Wendy

      Delete
    2. Wendy, what is the best technique to use when squeezing his balls to cause enough shock that he dies?

      Delete
    3. Well, I described already quite some serious techniques here to attack the testicles and some can lead to death. However, the purpose is never to kill him but to subdue him/incapacitate him to the extent that you can safely escape. The above-mentioned technique resembling cracking two walnuts nuts is very effective in accomplishing it, trust me, Wendy

      Delete
    4. Did you do that hard to the two mens helping with course. It would cause them much pains and serious dangers.

      Delete
    5. Hi, thanks for the question. We indeed tested the technique on Bob and Peter to learn it on real testicles and to see its effectiveness (it was :) but we did it mildly without causing the testicles to crack. It was still an unnerving experience though. Regards, Wendy

      Delete
  12. Hi Wendy, I've seen it mentioned a few times that in certain classes Bob and Peter performed their duties naked, but I can't find any posts that talk about this. Can you point me to the post(s) where this is discussed, or write a new article describing the classes where the boys were naked?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hi, yes indeed there were sessions where they had to expose their genitals, this was intended to learn male anatomy and to react when such a situation arouses during a sex attack. I have not written much about those sessions, it is obvious some readers are very upset that these activities took place during the course, but I would definitely write more later. You can read about one of the 'anatomy lessons' in this post about testicle size: https://lastresortselfdefense.blogspot.com/2021/11/does-size-matter.html
      Regards, Wendy

      Delete
  13. Why would someone as hateful as you are care what anyone but Linda thinks about what you say or promote or discuss on this blog? Peter and Bob were there to get their testicles struck, etc, and for you and the others to see the effects of the techniques and how the guy’s physiologically reacted to the pain. They signed a paper giving us their rights, so they were pretty much disposable training aids at that point.

    You seem to try to be half monk and half hit woman at the same time, when it’s obvious what you want is to just destroy the male, training helper or otherwise. So go ahead and tell us about all the times you and the others struck, kicked, squeezed their testicles hard and sent them to their knees convulsing or puking or shaking or whatever. Nobody cares about them, and you know it.

    ReplyDelete
  14. Wendy.. this is one of the good article i read from you.. Thanks for the explanation, but. I had read from others article, they say it is better to crush one organ first, the attacker will fall unconscious then proceed to crush the last one. this is all because most women hand are smaller and have limited strength to crush both simultaneosly. sorry my english not well hope you understand..^^

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hi, yes you are right, sometimes it is better to focus on one testicle, to apply a tight lock, and then destroy it. This should be possible even for a weak woman and an untrained hand. Sounds horrible but this is defense from a horrible crime. However, crushing one testicle and causing unconsciousness should be enough to get away. In some very grave serious situations, it might be done when a woman must be sure he is out, e.g. to get out from a locked room. Regards, Wendy

      Delete
    2. Thanks Wendy 😊, the previous question is my boyfriend. ya he tell me it is very important move if i have to crush both organs, but the attacker will be castrate if i do so, no more testosterone, no more sex drive and the attacker will loss ability to pregnant a women in future.. for my hand is small i will have to crush one organ first then proceed to crush the last one if im in the situation that i force to use it. waiting for your new post might be include some thumb pressure into the middle of the ball and thumb nail push and penetrate into the organ to initiate rupture.

      Delete